How do you define atheism?

I'm taking this argument over from a different thread to see how people here interpret the definition of the term atheism.

My argument is that the definition of the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is a misconception.

My argument is that the proper definition of the term "atheism" describes those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".

Theism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods exist".
Atheism: Those who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist".

My argument is that these are the proper standards that people in all areas of academics and otherwise use for the the term "atheism".


However, I noticed that many people online believe that the definition for the term "atheism" as presented by the infedel website is the proper standard use for the term.


They argue that all who do not believe that gods exist (including those that do not accept the proposition that "gods do not exist") fall under atheism. I argue that this is a misconception for the use of the term "atheism".

I argue that the proper definition for the term "atheism" describes only those that hold true the proposition that gods do not exist. None of the others fall under atheism. Not agnostics. Not anybody. Atheism is and only is meant to desceibe those who accept that there are no gods.

What about those that do not believe there are are gods, but don't necessarily believe there are no gods?
According to the proper definition of atheism, they are not atheists.
The infedels website defines them as atheists. My argument is that the infedels website incorrectly presents the definition of the term "atheism".

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

belief in lack of evidence of truth

it is not about Gods...it is about us.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

ook :bugeye:

 

I'd like to see peoples opinion or anybody to chalenge mine.

 

Anybody that does not believe in any God is an atheist.

 

:thumbsup:

 

This is a misconception of the term atheism.
Only those who believe there is no God is an atheist.

 

Not so.

Weak atheist: does not believe in any God.
Strong atheist: actively denies the existence of any God.

You definition is closer to 'strong atheist' while mine encompasses both.

Also, my definition includes agnostics. As they cannot take any stance they also do not believe in God.

 

Not necessarily, there are agnostic theists.

 

Yeah, never understood that term. To me, that's bullshit.
How can you not take any stance and still believe in God ? :shrug:

 

Because you're using the incorrect definition for agnosticism, it doesn't mean you don't take a stance when it comes to belief or disbelief in gods. Agnosticism simply means that one believes that the existence of gods is unknowable/unverifiable.

 

Don't all theist hold that position ? I think the bible says that God is unknowable ?

 

Some don't. Some claim that the existence of god can be proven.

 

lol ok..
I think agnosticism is a questionable position.

 

I think agnosticism is the only rational position. I'm an agnostic atheist.


From dictionary.com, bolded emphasis is mine:

ag·nos·ti·cism (āg-nŏs'tĭ-sĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. The doctrine that certainty about first principles or absolute truth is unattainable and that only perceptual phenomena are objects of exact knowledge.
2. The belief that there can be no proof either that God exists or that God does not exist.

 

Yeah, but come on.. that holds true for anything that doesn't exist.

So you are also agnostic about purple unicorns ?

 

Heh, I'm only agnostic about invisible incorporeal purple unicorns. Regular old purple unicorns, not so much.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

lol ok.
So you won't say they don't exist ?

 

I don't believe they exist, but how in the world would I verify the non-existence of an incorporeal invisible being?