-
05-05-10, 07:58 PM #19661Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
Not only did I not break an SB.com rule (as per an admin ruling on the thread) but they have agreed that your comments that I've copied over there are nothing more than fanboy wankism posted by a delusional idiot, and that I shouldn't take them seriously.
So, yeah, stuff it.
And who the fuck was talking about the Imperium fighting in the Warp? I'm talking about the Federation fighting while at Warp... reading comprehension ftw girlie...
Finally - you are a sad, sad little girl for resorting to such utter bullshit and personal attacks... plus, your "quotes" are little more than opinions
EDIT - oh, and for the record - EU =/= canon. It is supplementary canon. It fills in the gaps, yes, nothing more. The movies refute your crazy ass firepower theories time and again (the fact that AT-AT's have zero effect on the GROUND, TIE's have zero effect on asteroids, and blasters have ZERO effect on Leia's shirt) show that far too well. End o story.
-
05-05-10, 08:10 PM #19662Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Two words: The proofNot only did I not break an SB.com rule (as per an admin ruling on the thread) but they have agreed that your comments that I've copied over there are nothing more than fanboy wankism posted by a delusional idiot, and that I shouldn't take them seriously.
You DID break a rule, the "Other boards do not concern us rule, and it may be punished in a permanent ban" rule. The two words come to the wankism. If you told them that you think Federation of Dumbasses stands a chance against the Imperium, or the Borg stands a chance against the Necrons then they will state you are also an idiot, but they can't state I'm an idiot, because you would be banned, and there would be a THREAD. Hell, your microscopic brain thought I was deathmarine, even though a graphologist wouldn't need to be required to tell the difference between our posts.
I said the Federation stupid. The Imperium won't go ST Warp, so the Warp CAN'T be used against them.And who the fuck was talking about the Imperium fighting in the Warp? I'm talking about the Federation fighting while at Warp... reading comprehension ftw girlie...
Yeah, because you're such a wanking moron, that it's impossible not to. And my quotes are TRUTH, you're just a Trek wanker who believes Borg are a superpower.Finally - you are a sad, sad little girl for resorting to such utter bullshit and personal attacks... plus, your "quotes" are little more than opinions
AT-AT's blew up a 1km wide and tall generator in one shot, kilotons xD! That means they're Starfleet capable! I think they're stronger even, because the clouds in "Die is Cast" were high kiloton to low megaton, WHICH means 20 ships can barely produce a megaton. Ignoring the blasts destroying large parts of a wall againEDIT - oh, and for the record - EU =/= canon. It is supplementary canon. It fills in the gaps, yes, nothing more. The movies refute your crazy ass firepower theories time and again (the fact that AT-AT's have zero effect on the GROUND, TIE's have zero effect on asteroids, and blasters have ZERO effect on Leia's shirt) show that far too well. End o story.
-
05-05-10, 09:56 PM #19663Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
No, AT-AT's created a chain reaction in the energy matrix of said generator, causing it to self destruct. Their own blasters had ZERO effect against SNOW, not even melting SNOW. NOT. MELTING. SNOW. Need I say it again?
And again - The Die is Cast is a random, out of range sample, and thus can be discarded as it flies in the face of NUMEROUS other samples. It's simple statistics. Quite elementary my dear idiot.
And yes, I have taken to insulting you because
A) you seem fond of them
B) you seem only capable of responding to a statement if I insult you in the same breath
C) at this point it's clear you have the debating skills of a decaying whale carcass and as such I find it more entertaining to simply banter against you
-
05-05-10, 10:12 PM #19664Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
As for people calling you out:
jimthegrayy - pretty sure he was embellishing but we do here the ridiculous tera tonnage fire power fairly often
ProphetofWisdom - No, you clearly have the Star Wars Galactic Empire mixed up with the Invader Zim Irken Empire: One is out to conquer the galaxy... and the other one is out to conquer every last speck of dust in the entire universe!
1. Multi-petaton would be the Maim Bot. Which is an Irken ground unit.
2. 2.2 million Petatons MIGHT just count as a low end Irken civilian weapon for a ship in the sub-kilometer range or at most a 1.6 kilometer I would say.This made in regards to a statement you posted there... yes, he is out and out calling you DERANGED.Rama - Whilst his ramblings are deranged...
grdja - No one ever claimed that. TIEs and X-Wings just shoot mid range kiloton blasters.consequences - Give us some more quotes. PM someone here a link to the site in question in case the mods get tetchy about 'the affairs of other boards' policy. Convince the individual in question to register here so that he can be properly vilified, or on SD.net so that the intensity of the flames will cause his computer to vaporize.l33telboi - So, assuming Saxton's work is accurate (which I'm sure you know is pretty widely disputed), the methodology used to derive the power of a turbolaser is the following:
1. Calculate the kinetic energy of the asteroid.
2. Forget about the kinetic energy we just calculated.
3. Calculate the momentum the asteroid had.
4. Assume that a motherfucking beam of energy has to have the same momentum as the rock in order to achieve the same effects.
5. Assume the motherfucking turbolasers are massless.
6. Derive energy required to destroy the ship based on playing around with momentum and kinetic energy formulas?
Do you have any fucking idea just how batshit insane that is? Do you understand that using this methodology we could also deduce that blaster rifles have yield above the kiloton range?You have seen the posts yourself... I simply put them here for all to see... your shame is great, and your pathetic excuse for "debating" cannot be allowed to go on...Madd Luddite -
As for teraton fighter blasters, you're confusing teraton with terajoule, which is given by ICS. Frankly, terajoules (about 1/4 kilotons) are still too high for fighter blasters, but some novels say kilojoules, which if you look at an X-Wing strafe the Death Star's surface is nonsense.
God how I wish Highlander were real... I'd simply cut off your head and be done with ya.
-
05-05-10, 10:16 PM #19665
Who cares? The mods obviously didn't think it was enough of a transgression given that he wasn't punished.
No, they'd mock you for being a presumptious asshole who relies upon Ad Hominem in order to conduct your arguments rather than substantial arguments.The two words come to the wankism. If you told them that you think Federation of Dumbasses stands a chance against the Imperium, or the Borg stands a chance against the Necrons then they will state you are also an idiot, but they can't state I'm an idiot, because you would be banned, and there would be a THREAD. Hell, your microscopic brain thought I was deathmarine, even though a graphologist wouldn't need to be required to tell the difference between our posts.
Says the man who can't write a proper sentence in English.I said the Federation stupid.
Um...what?The Imperium won't go ST Warp, so the Warp CAN'T be used against them.
The Borg are a superpower. They've already proven the have the equal to time corridors and we know they're capable of moving across the galaxy via a transwarp network (of which, they have three--well, two now).Yeah, because you're such a wanking moron, that it's impossible not to. And my quotes are TRUTH, you're just a Trek wanker who believes Borg are a superpower.
Yes, because obviously hitting a large generatior capable of keeping a small fleet of powerful warships at bay in no way added to the entire structure being devistated.AT-AT's blew up a 1km wide and tall generator in one shot, kilotons xD!
Despite the fact that the old NX class could put large craters into asteroids with its phase cannons?That means they're Starfleet capable!
Your masturbation is simply astonishing to watch. You're worse the TW Scott. Now I'm going to have go back and personally deball you and your argument for such stupidity.I think they're stronger even, because the clouds in "Die is Cast" were high kiloton to low megaton, WHICH means 20 ships can barely produce a megaton. Ignoring the blasts destroying large parts of a wall again
First off, I find it highly unlikely that the fleet was only deploying low kt-mt level weaponry, simply from the fact that they expected to destroy the entire planet to the point that only the core remained. This is the most brutal thing we've ever heard of in either SW or ST, with small fleets tearing apart crust and mantle. It would put the Trek yields in the absurd levels honestly.
Of course, the problem is that they were clearly using technobabble weapons, given both that they can't effortlessly vaporize moons in single shots and by the visuals themselves. I've heard of numerous theories as to what this was, some disregarding the visuals (like I do) in this case and simply going with them using high level torpedoes that they wouldn't otherwise use (ie, illegal or simply too expensive).
I also find it rather amusing given that Tomorrow is Yesterday, we're told that a crippled Constitution class starship without shielding and slowly trying to escape atmosphere, could be devistated by a low kt nuclear warhead. Keep in mind, that a nuclear weapon detonated in atmosphere is going to be much more powerful than if it were in space. Yes, even one hundreds of times more powerful. And this is a ship that's over a hundred years out of date by Federation standards in the modern 24th century, where they take photon torpedoes calculated in the double digit megatons to triple digit megatons to the hull and survive.
Or of course, we could also point out that the Voyager hit that ice planet to an equal of a low kiloton explosion without so much more than taking damage to one of its nacelles. Even more interesting though, is how you wank to SW firepower, yet we see that a Venator suffers massive damage from what amounts to no more than a few hundred kilotons of KE impact in this last season of the Clone Wars. Care to explain?
-
05-05-10, 10:36 PM #19666Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
BTW - Et all:
Some of Riceroni's other threads:
Daleks are stronger than the Christian God Yaweh
Urban Dictionary Definition for Ricrery - And no, as much as I'd like to take credit, I did NOT write that.
Some info on a Ricrery courtesy of Electric Ferret forums
ricrery
Been Around the Block
16 years old
Male
Rancho Cucamonga
Born June-13-1993
Discussion between Ricrery, Perion (so that's the moron you keep mentioning) and others... they claim Stormtroopers "miss their targets on purpose"... heh...
-
05-05-10, 10:42 PM #19667Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
I KNOW who wrote it. And guess what, he's ON MY FRIENDS LIST.And no, as much as I'd like to take credit, I did NOT write that.
-
05-05-10, 10:48 PM #19668Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
-
05-05-10, 10:48 PM #19669Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
*chuckles* seems I struck a nerve class... watch out, Riceroni may start throwing his poo around next!
-
05-05-10, 10:57 PM #19670Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
-
05-05-10, 10:59 PM #19671Almighty Tallest
- Posts
- 297
-
05-05-10, 10:59 PM #19672Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Hooray for changing opinions!
Originally Posted by Ricrery
-
05-05-10, 11:00 PM #19673Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
-
05-05-10, 11:00 PM #19674Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
-
05-05-10, 11:01 PM #19675Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
-
05-05-10, 11:02 PM #19676Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,045
What proof... I saw plenty of opinions, that's for sure
I mean, think about it - we're comparing something that will NEVER exist (SW) vs something that wont' exist for a LONG LONG time, if ever (ST). Two fictional worlds... there can NEVER be any real proof if you want to be technical about it!
-
05-05-10, 11:03 PM #19677Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
-
05-05-10, 11:07 PM #19678
-
05-05-10, 11:08 PM #19679Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Stormtroopers are very good shots when the mission calls for it, and their weapons are extremely powerful when on high settings, capable of dealing far more damage to things like rocks and heavy metals than what Phasers are capable of, besides, in war it’s best to incapacitate the target rather than kill them outright.
also the empire have more variety in weapons, they have sustained fire weapons, effective Mortars, and combat vehicles.
the Federation don’t have any of those things.the Empire also make liberal use of Grenades that are far more effective than any federation counterpart, creating a blast easily the size of a house and with 3 of them capable of destroying a landing platform designed for light freighters!
one such grenade can (and has been shown to) easily take out an entire squad of enemy infantry.
Klingon Mortars can’t even knock down a Doctor and a Civilian unless it lands a foot away from one of them, and even then only causes burns on the skin.This is greater than every post you've ever made.not really, in Nemesis they were missing at spitting distance and their ship’s accuracy isn’t much better in DS9 battles.
Oh, the delusional fool... I bet you wear Starfleet pajamas, have your own holodeck, and your children are named Worf and Seven of Nine. XD.I mean, think about it - we're comparing something that will NEVER exist (SW) vs something that wont' exist for a LONG LONG time, if ever (ST). Two fictional worlds... there can NEVER be any real proof if you want to be technical about it!
-
05-05-10, 11:11 PM #19680Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Screen evidence doesn't show the Defiant glassing a planet in under 15 minutes, but screen evidence does show a fleet only creating dust clouds over a planet that last for a short while, and that is backed up by the Cardassian guy stating it would take one hour to destroy the core, and five more to destroy the mantle. It's in the same episode, and nothing denies that statement, heck, the bombardment volley encourages that statement.I have not "wanked" anything - everything I have said has been backed by on screen evidence, where as most of what you claim goes AGAINST on screen evidence... generally, when evidence supports something, it is not considered wanking...
Because you won't listen.Shame you can't do the same here and provide facts instead of personal attacks...
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks