-
04-13-10, 04:23 PM #18941
-
04-13-10, 04:58 PM #18942Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
-
04-13-10, 04:59 PM #18943Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
I'll do it again...
-
04-13-10, 05:01 PM #18944
Hey guys...someone is off his meds. I KNOW I'm not the only one who thinks he's phychologically unstable...
-
04-13-10, 05:18 PM #18945Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
You're an idiot for ignoring EU being canon. Never sniff wank glue, it's worse than super glue.
-
04-13-10, 05:23 PM #18946
-
04-13-10, 06:14 PM #18947Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
Same idea behind the Star Trek Phase Cloak - they are in between dimensions/universes/realities/whateveryouwanttocallthem. In the end, they're not affected by things in realspace, nor are they detectable via EM, Visible, Gravimetric, Magnometric, or any other known sensor system.
-
04-13-10, 06:17 PM #18948Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
A) Data is FULLY functional... to the point that he has had sex. Don't think any of your HRD's can claim that.
B) Not one source there is high cannon. However, in the movies, it is stated that R2D2 is one of the most advanced astro droids seen (as far as a personality) and that C3P0 is a highly advanced protocol droid. If they are what the movies consider advanced... good grief charlie brown.
-
04-13-10, 06:18 PM #18949Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
04-13-10, 06:19 PM #18950Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
Of course the Tommy Gun fucked the borg:
A) They didn't have shields designed to protect from Kinetic Energy weapons (why would they... Projectile Weapons are all but obsolete)
B) They didn't have any time to adapt
C) those bullets weren't even REAL - they were holographic, though with the safeties disengaged
So, STFU noob.
-
04-13-10, 06:20 PM #18951Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
Yes, fanboy is sad... at least, you seem very sad to me. Sad, pathetic, and grasping at straws (and strawman, appeal to ignorance, and other basic fallacies that anyone with even the most remote semblance of logic could tell was bullshit)
Sadly for you, where the EU contradicts the Movies, the movies win. And according to Lucas himself, SW ends with the final movie. ENDS. END OF STORY.
He said it, thus it is so.
-
04-13-10, 06:21 PM #18952Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
04-13-10, 06:22 PM #18953Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
04-13-10, 06:29 PM #18954Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
Actually, Trek does have a lot of realistic science... hell, even their propulsion system is theoretically possible (Albecurie Drive for one)... PHASERs originally stood for PHoton mASER, since when ST was first conceived, Lasers were rather low power and not well known. However, they changed it to the backronym PHASed Energy Rectification after the third season of TOS. Photon Masers are quite common...
Deuterium = Real
Anti-Matter = Real
Warp Drive = Possible
M/AM Reactor = Possible
Mass Lightening Field = Possible
EM Force Shields = Real
Gravimetric/Magnometric sensors = Real
Transporters = Possible
Cloaking Devices = Possible
Tritanium Alloy = Real (though not yet able to be made)
Crystalline Life Form = Real (silicone life form IRL)
the list goes on...
In fact, the few things from Trek that are NOT possible:
Dilithium Crystals - don't exist (as far as we know)
Subspace Coms/Sensors - don't exist (with current tech)
However, look at SW:
Hyperspace - Impossible
Hypermatter - Impossible
SuperLasers - Impossible
Neutronium - Doesn't Exist
The Force - Do I need to say it?
Ion Drives (they way they are depicted in SW) - Impossible
Ray/particle Shields - Impractical
and the list goes on... in fact, the few things in SW that are possible include Protocol Droids, AI, and the government systems... lol... not very promising.
-
04-13-10, 06:31 PM #18955Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
And your point with ANY of this is what? Oooh, Lucas has the ability to use outside sources (without crediting them no less)... Good for him. However, that doesn't make the rest of EU high cannon.
This is a common fallacy when debating - it's called IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE fallacy.
-
04-13-10, 06:31 PM #18956Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
04-13-10, 06:32 PM #18957Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
04-13-10, 06:34 PM #18958
-
04-13-10, 06:38 PM #18959Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Watch thisHowever, look at SW:
Hyperspace - Multiverse
Hypermatter -Multiverse
SuperLasers - Who says?
Neutronium - Who says?
The Force - Not science
Ion Drives Multiverse
Ray/particle Shields - How so?
-
04-13-10, 06:39 PM #18960Banned
- Posts
- 1,616
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0


Reply With Quote
care to explain your "DUR BORG KAN ADAPT TOO ANYTING CUZ THEY ADAPT!" wank?


Bookmarks