-
03-10-10, 08:20 PM #17681
I thought you were Christian, remember the ten commandments in Deuteronomy 5:
Number 3: ( from the King James version ) Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
Number 9: Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy
neighbour. ( Your neighbour doesn't mean your next door neighbour, it also includes all human beings )
The Lord Jesus Christ teaches us to be humble and bless the humble, therefore we must be humble.
Blessed are the meek,
for they shall possess the earth.
Blessed are the pure of heart,
for they shall see God.
Do not forget the beatitudes.
We will be immortal AFTER the final judgment, before then we are humans. Saying you are beyond human is disrespectful to god, because in the bible it says we are created in the image of god.
This is not just a reply for that one its also for the your reply for my previous comment. I am a devoted Mormon, two can play at that game.
-
03-11-10, 02:43 AM #17682Registered Member
- Posts
- 2
Star Trek takes its science far too seriously... which would be fine if it was any good but it's as scientifically accurate as Dan Brown. As soon as they tried to fire up their engines in anger, bits would fall off.
the force ftw.
-
03-11-10, 10:21 AM #17683
Excuse me??!?! So now you threatening me too????!
what apology?? YOU are the one who started this whole mess, by insulting and attacking my idea by telling me it's deluded nonsense!!!!!!!! I was having a civilized discussion about Vader, the Prophets and souls, and after, you popped in out of nowhere and told me I'm flooding the forum with bullshit!! and that you'd "call me on it". If anything YOU should be the one to apologize to me!
Why are you deliberately changing what I said? Again you are making me repeat myself. Yes you changed my syntax by cutting off certain sentences midsentence thereby changing the meaning of what I said. And thereby showing those sentences with modified syntax, out of context!!
See?? and then you want ME to apologize??? This sentence is evidence that you are continually perpetuating something without cause!! Simply to satisfy your boredom with rediculous arguments!!
It's not your place to call me on my nonsense when I never insulted you or the others with the idea that I presented. That is your ego talking. Also, because it's NOT your call as to what ideas someone presents, you have violated my civil rights.
Oh wow...you pretend to maintain this site, and yet you forget that the edits have time posts.....you really are a piece of work, you know that?
Again you were the one that started this whole "unsupported claims" business instead of leaving us alone with our innocent discussion of souls in SW/STLast edited by Apocalypse2001; 03-11-10 at 10:22 AM. Reason: spelling
-
03-11-10, 10:25 AM #17684
-
03-11-10, 10:44 AM #17685
as Dywyddyr: here the page where you started telling me this crap (i.e. you are resposible for perpetuating a stupid argument, and wasting everybodies time):
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=7435&page=880
-
03-11-10, 10:46 AM #17686Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 38
Star wars would must definitely win
-
03-11-10, 11:19 AM #17687
I'm pointing out that calling someone a liar with no reason to do so is a bannable offence.
You accused me of lying. I'm still waiting for you to either show I did or apologise.what apology?? YOU are the one who started this whole mess, by insulting and attacking my idea by telling me it's deluded nonsense!!!!!!!!
You posted bullshit, I pointed out that it's bullshit.I was having a civilized discussion about Vader, the Prophets and souls, and after, you popped in out of nowhere and told me I'm flooding the forum with bullshit!! and that you'd "call me on it". If anything YOU should be the one to apologize to me!
Wrong again: syntax is the structure, which I did not alter. I quoted your words and didn't alter the structure or the context.Why are you deliberately changing what I said? Again you are making me repeat myself. Yes you changed my syntax by cutting off certain sentences midsentence thereby changing the meaning of what I said. And thereby showing those sentences with modified syntax, out of context!!
You made erroneous statements as if they were fact, you made erroneous accusations.See?? and then you want ME to apologize??? This sentence is evidence that you are continually perpetuating something without cause!! Simply to satisfy your boredom with rediculous arguments!!
It's a public forum: posters spouting bullshit will get called on it. Civil rights? What civil rights do you think you have on an internet forum?It's not your place to call me on my nonsense when I never insulted you or the others with the idea that I presented. That is your ego talking. Also, because it's NOT your call as to what ideas someone presents, you have violated my civil rights.
Oh yeah, the "right" to make false accusations of lying and spout bullshit while ignoring that it has been shown to be bullshit.
And your point would be? I'm fully aware that edits have times on them: and I'm STILL waiting for you to either apologise or show where I lied.Oh wow...you pretend to maintain this site, and yet you forget that the edits have time posts.....you really are a piece of work, you know that?
If you'd bothered actually reading my first post in reply to you I called you bullshit that has nothing at all to do with SW or ST - in other words YOU went off-topic with nonsensical claims.Again you were the one that started this whole "unsupported claims" business instead of leaving us alone with our innocent discussion of souls in SW/ST
-
03-11-10, 11:52 AM #17688
So you wanted prove of your behavior, here it is:
You attack someones ideas by attacking THEM for no reason.
This, is an insult. Since you are unwilling to learn from me, and for your ignorance, I direct you to the library of Alexandria in Egypt.
Again for your stubborness and ignorance, I direct you to a library.
This is ANOTHER insult. You attack me, instead of discussing, like a civilized person, about my initial idea. But since you like insults instead of understanding, AGAIN I direct you to the Library of Alexandria in Egypt. And to the Apocryphal Gospels.
Debates are not attacking the PERSON, but providing knowledge with knowledge. Something which you have NOT done.
By editing seprate sentences and separating them from the explanation, you are being fascist and are controlling my language.
It was not an observation because you continuously made insults
This, is called fascism. YOU blew it out of porposion instead of providing your own knowledge to refute what I said. BUT YOU HAVE NOT!
This was the lie.........
.........and this is what you actually said. So you are going to tell me I'm making false accusations??? I don't think so.
No you don't. You take individual sentences out of context, without including the explantations. Therefore you are censoring.
AGAIN!! ANOTHER insult, without provided your own knowledge. And you STILL have not provided anything to refute my point.
So there you have it. As you can see, my accusations are not lies, delusional, OR false.
next topic please.
-
03-11-10, 01:00 PM #17689
No, I wanted proof of the lies you claimed I told.
So you don't think claiming not to be human is deluded?You attack someones ideas by attacking THEM for no reason.
That insult came after yours...This, is an insult.
YOU claimed that YOU could demonstrate your points, if you're now claiming that I can get the information from books please indicate which ones.Since you are unwilling to learn from me, and for your ignorance, I direct you to the library of Alexandria in Egypt.
Again for your stubborness and ignorance, I direct you to a library.
I refer you to my comment above on not being human.This is ANOTHER insult. You attack me, instead of discussing, like a civilized person, about my initial idea.
Why?But since you like insults instead of understanding, AGAIN I direct you to the Library of Alexandria in Egypt. And to the Apocryphal Gospels.
Wrong again: YOU made the initial nonsensical claim and so far you have provided nothing to substantiate those claims.Debates are not attacking the PERSON, but providing knowledge with knowledge. Something which you have NOT done.
Wrong. I quote your words as they were written.By editing seprate sentences and separating them from the explanation, you are being fascist and are controlling my language.
I refer you to the forums rules, specifically:This, is called fascism. YOU blew it out of porposion instead of providing your own knowledge to refute what I said. BUT YOU HAVE NOT!
You have provided no knowledge, merely nonsensical opinion with no supporting evidence (and in fact an opinion which contradicts what is currently known). When (if at all) are YOU going to provide any support for those opinions?C. Stating Opinions
If you have an opinion, back it up with evidence, a valid argument and even links and references if possible.
I see: so now you've changed your mind on what my "lie" was about. Your original claim was that I lied about my comment on foul language.This was the lie.........
Post 17679.
Originally Posted by Apocalypse
You have made numerous false accusations..........and this is what you actually said. So you are going to tell me I'm making false accusations??? I don't think so.
One more time: give an example of where I have altered the wording (you claimed I changed the syntax) or even the meaning.No you don't. You take individual sentences out of context, without including the explantations. Therefore you are censoring.
So you consider that calling arrant nonsense arrant nonsense is an insult?AGAIN!! ANOTHER insult, without provided your own knowledge. And you STILL have not provided anything to refute my point.
I haven't provided anything to "refute your point" since you haven't provided anything other than deluded misinformed opinion.
Actually I have just shown that you can't even keep your false accusations straight, in other words you're even less honest than I had originally taken you for.So there you have it. As you can see, my accusations are not lies, delusional, OR false.
-
03-11-10, 01:22 PM #17690
you ask for support and I have already offered it to you at least 3 times. Since you are unwilling to learn in person (yes that is "providing...") I directed you to libraries including the one in Alexandria. So you can understand SOMETHING.....
And I won't answer your other questions since you are unwilling to search for the information yourself. Someone who is unwilling to take up, said person, on their CONTINUOUS offers, they must search for the knowledge himself. End of story.
And I'm sorry you are sooooo unwilling to learn.Last edited by Apocalypse2001; 03-11-10 at 01:25 PM. Reason: added one word
-
03-11-10, 01:33 PM #17691
No you haven't.
Unless you count "come to meet me and I'll show you" as support.
And when I get to the library which books should I read?Since you are unwilling to learn in person (yes that is "providing...") I directed you to libraries including the one in Alexandria. So you can understand SOMETHING.....
Wrong again: there is no information to look up because you're spouting nonsense.And I won't answer your other questions since you are unwilling to search for the information yourself. Someone who is unwilling to take up, said person, on their CONTINUOUS offers, they must search for the knowledge himself. End of story.
And I'm sorry you are sooooo unwilling to learn.
I note you failed completely to address any of my other points (e.g. the apology OR the proof that I lied).
You're a deluded dishonest troll.
-
03-11-10, 01:45 PM #17692Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
hi again!
is this think solved???or not?
-
03-11-10, 01:46 PM #17693Banned
- Posts
- 2,425
I cant belive 42 people voted for Spaceballs.
-
03-11-10, 01:53 PM #17694
well duh. if someone tell you they can teach you in person and the other person does not want to, that's their problem.
umm...as much as you can....
I've already been there and have read about 1809 books, scrolls, microfiche etc.
yes there is. Only if you have blinders on, like a horse, will you think that there is nothing to read.
why apologize since you continue to name call? (note: I've already stopped with MY tantrum like behavior, unlike you)
my my my....continuing to throw insults that display tantrums, huh? OH WAIT! maybe you are going to say that's a lie too?
I'm sorry for whatever you think I should have apologized for. Which still seems nonexistent.
-
03-11-10, 02:46 PM #17695
Wrong: it just confirms that you're bullshitting.
1809 books?umm...as much as you can....
I've already been there and have read about 1809 books, scrolls, microfiche etc.
I own more than three times that number.
Wrong.yes there is. Only if you have blinders on, like a horse, will you think that there is nothing to read.
So you're not going to apologise for accusing me of lying? Or attempt to show where I did? You'd rather pretend you don't know, even after I have specifically quoted your accusation AND shown where you were wrong?why apologize since you continue to name call? (note: I've already stopped with MY tantrum like behavior, unlike you)
my my my....continuing to throw insults that display tantrums, huh? OH WAIT! maybe you are going to say that's a lie too?
I'm sorry for whatever you think I should have apologized for. Which still seems nonexistent.
You'd prefer to continue in your dishonesty.
-
03-11-10, 04:09 PM #17696
-
03-11-10, 05:13 PM #17697
-
03-11-10, 05:13 PM #17698Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
this conversation has gotten way of track!
let's go back to the main idea: Vader would kick Kiri's ,Picard's and the others asses!
-
03-11-10, 05:18 PM #17699
I would love to see Kirk and Picard tried to do 1 on 1 combat with Vader.
-
03-11-10, 05:18 PM #17700
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks