-
10-04-09, 01:06 AM #16921Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
-
10-04-09, 06:58 AM #16922
-
10-04-09, 07:01 AM #16923
ahem, if you wouldlike me to be more specific, yes a Fed ship can hover in the uper layers of the atmoshere but they are not build to be taicaly usefull in such scenarios that involve even 1/4 impulse. we can only speculate what is their "safe" speed limit in say the stratosphere.
-
10-04-09, 07:04 AM #16924
but you see this is really why we are so restricted when we defend UFP in ground combat. the burden of proof falls on the one that claims the entity's existance. the same rule goes for SW when they descrube all the miriad ships and equipement that there is no trace of in the movies and clone wars but only in some books (SW canon is a mess, many would use ALL the works in their deffence).
-
10-04-09, 07:09 AM #16925
i did not mention the interceptors, tie-advanced or defenders. not even the bombers. i specificaly pointed the basic fighters. they are probably cheap (hence the lack of quality) but they are the worse option for a pilot to fly in SW. as for the shuttles VS ties, i really have no opinion on that one. i gues if the battle is near a planet's uper atmoshere the ties would have a bit more of a chance, but not by much. in open space, they are simply to resrtrected in their operations.
-
10-04-09, 07:12 AM #16926
you must realise i am not really taking a "side" because i like them. i just hate when people start making up "shit" (as you'd say), to make their side win. the rules of the engagement were clearly defined in the beggining, only what's confirmed goes.
and yes i like the ISDs too. they just have that "back off i'm mean MF" looks.
as for the rest of your comment TWS already replied
-
10-04-09, 07:18 AM #16927
the example you chose is a good one to make a point, after all the Intrepid is not really that heavily shielded. what i laways foun fishy (like i did with the portable transporter thingy) was that an ion cannon is anywhere near a SW laser or turbo laser in their firepower. all the ion guns i've ever seen in movie or a game, do absolutely 0 damage against equipement or rock, so what ever their type of dammage is it probably works only on electrical systems. if they were , say 1000 times more powerful then your standard ion storm (what ever that is) they would cause serios thermal burnouts throut a starship's hull and easely fry smaller vessels or objects
-
10-04-09, 07:20 AM #16928
-
10-04-09, 07:27 AM #16929
never the less the storms are what we see imployed. i have no doubt they have some special forces too, but when someone mentions empire infantry, those are it. for their numbers... this lives us with much speculation. i'd expect the empire to outmatch UFP in sheer numbers yes. but not the UFP, Klingons (as useless as their melees seam to be), Romulans, Cardassians or Gorn put together with other factions. Dominion alone is probably the most inwxhaustable source of "men-power" and eqipement in SF. their troops and crews become fully operational in only 7 days, whicj means that unlike other factions that can rebuild their fleets in small time periods, the Dominion can actually men them too.
-
10-04-09, 07:30 AM #16930
-
10-04-09, 07:30 AM #16931Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Actually while many star trek vessels can travel in upper atmosphere for short period they must do so slowly. The GCS Enterprise was in danger of destroying itself when travelling at 1/4 impulse in an atmosphere.Originally Posted by Kittamaru
Uhm, 90% of Trek vessels are capable of atmospheric travel... the key words here are Controlled Entry - the Ent-D's saucer section blasted into the atmosphere at well over half impulse... so probably around Mach 20 at a bare minimum...
Conversely, a SW Capital Ship was ripped apart by atmospheric re-entry at speeds slow enough that water jets were able to be poured onto the ship...
As for the descent of the Invisible Hand. The ships had suffered massive structura damage before it had ever even started plummets toward Coruscant. Also from the way the spray stuck to the ships hull instead of evaporating away that was obviously a very high pressure foam being sprayed. Probablyy enahnced with repulser technology to account for it;s realitive steady steam. Besides did you not see the end of Attack of the CLones when massive carrier ships were liesurely taking from Coruscant.
-
10-04-09, 07:32 AM #16932
-
10-04-09, 07:33 AM #16933Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Actually in defense SW gets EU while there is no such thing for Star Trek. And I did not mention the Photn mortar as it was obviously a support weapon akin to today 60mm mortars (in size if not effect) We also didn't see all that much destructive potentila as it targets (unarmored Gorns on foot) survive to run away.
Last edited by TW Scott; 10-04-09 at 09:26 PM.
-
10-04-09, 07:36 AM #16934
ground assults woul be usefull every time there is no direct starships suport. at least in UFP's case. they do have the ability to stun from orbit with ship sized phasers. for the empire it is a bit more direct. if they want to capture a base/city/planet they have to invade.
-
10-04-09, 07:37 AM #16935
-
10-04-09, 07:39 AM #16936
-
10-04-09, 07:41 AM #16937
they also blast through lots of rock, turn those into nothing, kineticaly open a blast door without any recoil, melt metal and rock...if we have to be neatty we musty say that if a phaser stops at a cardboard box it is configured to do so. blame the silly but politicaly correct policy of non-lethal force usage
-
10-04-09, 07:45 AM #16938
that thing always puzzled me. i mean it created a really big bang, followed by a shockwave that even a heavy artilery shell would not acomplish, heck even a plane droped heavy bomb, but the gorn survived. was Kirk's aim really that off? did he miss on purpose? were gorn shielded?
-
10-04-09, 11:23 AM #16939Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,049
-
10-04-09, 11:24 AM #16940Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,049
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks