-
01-02-11, 11:13 PM #22221Banned
- Posts
- 6
-
01-02-11, 11:49 PM #22222Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
01-03-11, 05:55 AM #22223Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Last edited by TW Scott; 01-03-11 at 09:44 PM.
-
01-03-11, 07:51 AM #22224Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
canon is SW is divided in a five. only 3 are to be used. G canon being the movies and any note from Lucas, T-canon, the Clone Wars and any tv series, and C canon, consisting of all recent works (and many older works) released under the name of Star Wars: books, comics, games, cartoons, non-theatrical films, and more. there is also s canon, which i don't use and non canon.
only G,T and C canon are used in this debate.
-
01-03-11, 07:55 AM #22225Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
you have not showed any contradiction with the movies. SHOW ME ONE. ONE.
that's all i ask. until you prove that, the ICS is acceptable evidence, like it or not.
any way, i got far from my intention. i only wanted to give Apocalypse2001 a site with the schematics. nothing more. then you jump in yelling its out of context. WTF?
-
01-03-11, 12:01 PM #22226Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
I would hardly say what I posted constitutes yelling. It was simply clarifying that you stick to the ICS like gospel even when it has been disproven.
I need not post any contradictions - this has already been done time and time again, by saquist, myself, and at least a half dozen others.
Given your penchant for ignoring this evidence, backed by mathematical, photographic, and dialogue proofs, I really don't see the point in arguing with you any longer - those that are willing to accept simple logic will do so, and in doing so they will realize that, while the ICS is a very pretty picture book with awesome "fluff", it's just that - a picture book with fluff, not to be taken seriously.
If you really want to know why nobody with an ounce of common sense takes the ICS seriously:
Read This
Notable information - the movie was not even FINISHED when the ICS came out...
So, you can see, a vast majority of his "figures" are based on concept art and script, not the movie itself.
Originally Posted by Curtis Saxton
(Incidentally, Wayne Poe has provided a quote which helps to further establish the facts in the interview:
""People might wonder about whether or not interviews are official. Every word I wrote in the interview had to be approved by Lucy Wilson before TFN could post anything." ---Curtis Saxton")
One perfect example of why his numbers are craptastic:
Take, for instance, Boba's several shots against Obi-Wan on the Kamino platform. In the canon novelization, we're told that these shots drained the energy packs of the weapon.


Now, again, those shots DRAINED the energy packs of the weapon as per the script, what we see, and the novelization:
"... Slave I's cannon went silent, the energy pack depleted for the moment."Oh, but wait, people claim "the packs were still charging"... okay... we have an answer to that:The discrepancy rests with the firepower figures given for that weapon in the ICS . . . 600 gigajoules, or 143 tons of TNT, per shot. In other words, Saxton claims that the numerous shots shown above depleted the energy packs of a weapon which is usually capable of firing much more powerful shots. Let's say, just for argument's sake, that the platform explosions were equivalent to 25 kilograms of TNT, and that it was one shot from the guns instead of several. That would mean that the energy packs were depleted by a shot over 5,700 times less powerful than a standard shot.
For a comparison, let's look at one of the nuclear tests conducted by the United States. In December of 1964, during the "Sulky" test, a small nuclear weapon of 0.092 kilotons yield (about 385 gigajoules) was placed 27.1 meters underground. When detonated beneath the granite, it managed to produce sufficient fracture damage at the surface to create a rare retarc, 24 meters wide. With a detonation closer to the surface, this would've been a 24 meter crater, given the "chimney" effect of underground detonations.
Note how, in the platform pictures above, there is no 24 meter blast area, nor anything close to it, even from all of the shots put together. Obi-Wan, standing right next to the explosions, was barely moved by comparison.
So, either these things take around an hour and a half to charge enough for ONE full power shot, or there is some MAJOR wankage going on here.Some apologeticists have gone great lengths to try to rationalize this. One of the most common efforts is to claim that the energy packs mentioned in the novel were still charging, though no such statement is made in the novel, nor can such a thing be inferred from it. We're told that "Boba fired up the energy packs and clicked off the locking mechanism of the main laser", and that's it. Even assuming that the packs were not charged, however, they had at least a full second in which to charge up . . . it therefore would've taken an additional 5,700 seconds (95 minutes) for them to have charged to the ICS levels, and that's just for one ICS-level shot. Another maneuver is to attempt to claim that energy weapons and nuclear weapons don't act in the same manner, as if we're supposed to believe that a small area of very high energy density won't expand the same way because of where the energy came from.
Funny enough, he even went over your asteroid destruction scene:
See Fett Smack an Asteroid
So, in short, right there, we have a ship who's claimed firepower is VASTLY in excess of what we EVER actually see on screen.
And the list goes on and on... but I await your "BUT BUT BUT"s to see if it's even worth continuing to list them.
To ice this cake:
One person Saxton has responded to was Wong's cohort "Ender" from the SD.Net BBS, who had this to say:
"I emailed him about how he achieved the values for the 900 Gigajoule
Blaster at the tail of Slave 1. He said that he went by the damage it is
shown to do to other vessels in the comics in battles and assumed that Boba
dialed down the power in the movie [...]. He chose official over canon."
If indeed the choice was made to accept a comic book over canon, then (a) our point is proved and (b) that's just awful. It's even worse when you consider that, if it was determined that what Slave I had done to other vessels represented almost 0.15 kilotons of firepower, then similarly inflated EU values (in line with the inflated BDZ calcs, and as opposed to even the pre-existing canon) must have been used.Last edited by Kittamaru; 01-04-11 at 09:26 AM.
-
01-03-11, 12:26 PM #22227Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
By the way:
If you want to get a glimpse into the, hm, mental stability of some of the Pro-Wars debaters at StarDestroyer.net...
Just Read This
It is quite disturbing... but I'll post it here for you to see:
Yes... they are that crazy.
Originally Posted by Wayne Poe
-
01-03-11, 12:45 PM #22228
So wow even Star War wookies go crazy on each other well that sucks oh well while the wookies beat each other up, we trekkies are going to go get some popcorn and discuss the fundimentals about why no one in the SW universe can shoot straight and ST can with better weapons.
-
01-03-11, 04:22 PM #22229
-
01-03-11, 06:13 PM #22230Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
It's all they have to stand on TBH... they know they can't refute the proof, so they simply try to ignore and avoid it...
-
01-03-11, 09:46 PM #22231Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
-
01-03-11, 10:17 PM #22232Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
well, I don't know if they are "ny repeated ad nauseum"... they are repeated, however, every time the ICS comes up because, sadly for you, it's the truth.
And nobody wants "your cae", whatever that is

L2 Type plzkthnx... you don't have an excuse for your consistent poor spelling... or do you
It would explain a lot...
-
01-04-11, 12:12 AM #22233Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Listen, It is fine to bring up the ability for the ICS to be disproven, WHEN you are disproving it. To do otherwise is not a valid debate tactic. Spreading doubt over and established fact without evidence showing why there should be doubt is a dirty tactic. Only the truly desperate would use it.
-
01-04-11, 01:12 AM #22234Purveyor of Truth and Fact
- Posts
- 5,063
-
01-04-11, 03:14 AM #22235Banned
- Posts
- 6
Aye, generally universes like Stargate and Warhammer 40,000 are usually believed to be in the gigaton range, and even then there are arguments against that. Star Wars and Star Trek firepower is just all over the place, and people debate for numbers multiple orders of magnitudes apart.
Edit: Are you the Kittamaru from Spacebattles?
-
01-04-11, 06:20 AM #22236Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
Kit, i've read all of those, thanks for the lecture.
but it's not proof that the ICS is NOT canon. again you fail.
-
01-04-11, 06:42 AM #22237Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
its canon still, therefor i can take it as a gospel. and again, it is not disproven. only by you trekkies.
haha, funny, but no. go ahead with the delusion. its not been disproven. its just a trekkie delusion.I need not post any contradictions - this has already been done time and time again, by saquist, myself, and at least a half dozen others.
i take everything you call "proof" seriously. the ICS is a book that stands against delusional people who dare talk to me like that when they denied every shred of proof i provided.Given your penchant for ignoring this evidence, backed by mathematical, photographic, and dialogue proofs, I really don't see the point in arguing with you any longer - those that are willing to accept simple logic will do so, and in doing so they will realize that, while the ICS is a very pretty picture book with awesome "fluff", it's just that - a picture book with fluff, not to be taken seriously.
[QUOTE]
If you really want to know why nobody with an ounce of common sense takes the ICS seriously:
Read Thisinteresting, but no. that site is another trekkie delusional site. again, Saxton is an astrophysicist. his work is canon and you just don't like i.
aha, and that proves what?Notable information - the movie was not even FINISHED when the ICS came out...
unfortunately that only proved they toke seriously everything. they followed thr concept art, and their work is not in contradiction with canon.So, you can see, a vast majority of his "figures" are based on concept art and script, not the movie itself.
(Incidentally, Wayne Poe has provided a quote which helps to further establish the facts in the interview:
""People might wonder about whether or not interviews are official. Every word I wrote in the interview had to be approved by Lucy Wilson before TFN could post anything." ---Curtis Saxton")
and yet, later in the asteroid belt, it vaporized several asteroids in multiple shots. wow, yes, DRAINED!One perfect example of why his numbers are craptastic:
Now, again, those shots DRAINED the energy packs of the weapon as per the script, what we see, and the novelization:
Obviously, you never ever watched the actual movie.Oh, but wait, people claim "the packs were still charging"... okay... we have an answer to that:
So, either these things take around an hour and a half to charge enough for ONE full power shot, or there is some MAJOR wankage going on here.
Funny enough, he even went over your asteroid destruction scene:
again this delusion site.
again, you are delusional sir. go see a doctor. it never says anywhere the shots were at full power, except the novelization, which is know to exaggerate things. but you and other delusional trekkies go on ahead and don't even consider what is excluded as canon. you see, the novelization has parts that are not canon. this is one of them. the shots were not at full power dude. get over it.So, in short, right there, we have a ship who's claimed firepower is VASTLY in excess of what we EVER actually see on screen.
And the list goes on and on... but I await your "BUT BUT BUT"s to see if it's even worth continuing to list them.
, yes, official that IS canon in its own right. dude, get some glasses."I emailed him about how he achieved the values for the 900 Gigajoule
Blaster at the tail of Slave 1. He said that he went by the damage it is
shown to do to other vessels in the comics in battles and assumed that Boba
dialed down the power in the movie [...]. He chose official over canon."
again, you proved nothing. the comics are canon, and saxton inspire from them is normal if the book was to get ahead the film. the few parts in which it dose contradicts the movies are plain mistakes that everyone makes. but you see it doesn't contradict the scale you and that site claim. on the other hand, you can't prove that Boba didn't shot a low yield shot at oby wan. one full shot would have vaporized the who place including his father. there is absolutely no reason to dismember this argument.If indeed the choice was made to accept a comic book over canon, then (a) our point is proved and (b) that's just awful. It's even worse when you consider that, if it was determined that what Slave I had done to other vessels represented almost 0.15 kilotons of firepower, then similarly inflated EU values (in line with the inflated BDZ calcs, and as opposed to even the pre-existing canon) must have been used.
and yet again, you lose.
-
01-04-11, 06:43 AM #22238Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
-
01-04-11, 06:49 AM #22239Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
aha, well let's see...ITS A MOVIE, and they mysteriously can't shot only in the main characters...
that is up to debate. in ST, the main characters ALWAYS get shoot when in battle...mostly. i can ask why Klingons rule a vast empire when they throw down their phasers and go ahead with swords and that fancy weapon...what's it called? any way, its fiction. the stormtroopers are actually good shooters. ask a weapon specialist that went to war how hard it is to shoot a target while being shoot at by them.and ST can with better weapons.
-
01-04-11, 06:50 AM #22240Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 929
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0


Reply With Quote
......
here they go again. Repetition ad nauseum...

Bookmarks