Star Wars vs Star Trek

**Shogun** · 10-07-10, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by Omega133

Define awesome.

The dictionary definition will do.

**Omega133** · 10-07-10, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Shogun

The dictionary definition will do.

Well, in certain category's Star Trek is awesome.

**Kittamaru** · 10-08-10, 12:46 AM

Awesome - striking or causing one to look on as in awe or wonder.

**Stray Dog5** · 10-09-10, 06:00 PM

thank you for the definition that was agreeable

**Shogun** · 10-09-10, 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by Kittamaru

Awesome - striking or causing one to look on as in awe or wonder.

Yep that is it

**The Esotericist** · 10-12-10, 12:32 AM

I came across this, did a search, nothing came up, so all go on the assumption it hasn't been posted yet. I thought people here would get a kick out of it. . .

Star Wars vs. Star Trek Theatrical Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEE4P...layer_embedded

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek - DMP Edition HQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgHhUZt8j98&NR=1

**Kittamaru** · 10-12-10, 01:09 PM

Originally Posted by ricrery

Kittamaru thinks that the sun generates 1x10E^45J per cubic meter (LOL), and gets mad when people use Mike Wong (someone who understands physics, but then again, those who barely understand it are more reliable than Mr. 10E^44J) and his numbers at all.

*giggles* oh my, he's back - and quoting a single mistake I made.

let me tell you all the full story - I was trying to calculate the output of the solar event the Ent-D used to destroy a borg ship (the funky looking one, not the cube) - I made the mistake of taking a university textbook author at his word on the energetic output of a stars corona - he was assuming a density of 20kilopascals in the corona, which is grossly incorrect (but I did not realize at the time of my doing the calculation)

Now, my calculation was spot on - however, because one of my data points (taken from someone with a degree in astro physics none the less) was incorrect, I wound up claiming a solar flare had an energy output in excess of that of a full blown supernova.

An honest mistake... yet Rice Cake here desperately clings to that mistake, pointing it out to anyone who will listen as though it marks me as the anti-christ.

It's... hilarious actually. He's that desperate to make ME look bad because he can't disprove my arguments... *giggles* Oh silly rice cake, nobody takes you seriously anymore

**Shogun** · 10-12-10, 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by Kittamaru

=
An honest mistake... yet Rice Cake here desperately clings to that mistake, pointing it out to anyone who will listen as though it marks me as the anti-christ.

It's... hilarious actually. He's that desperate to make ME look bad because he can't disprove my arguments... *giggles* Oh silly rice cake, nobody takes you seriously anymore

He does it a lot, except for me he makes up stuff and says I said it, and then blame me for that ONE thing for eternity.

**Kittamaru** · 10-13-10, 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by ricrery

Kittamaru thinks that the sun generates 1x10E^45J per cubic meter (LOL), and gets mad when people use Mike Wong (someone who understands physics, but then again, those who barely understand it are more reliable than Mr. 10E^44J) and his numbers at all.

Oh, and by the way - Mike Wong has a BACHELORS in APPLIED SCIENCE... hardly a doctorate in physics... but that doesn't matter. Wars fanatics will praise him as God anyway, just because he says what they want to hear

**Apocalypse2001** · 10-13-10, 09:00 PM

Originally Posted by The Esotericist

I came across this, did a search, nothing came up, so all go on the assumption it hasn't been posted yet. I thought people here would get a kick out of it. . .

Star Wars vs. Star Trek Theatrical Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEE4P...layer_embedded

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek - DMP Edition HQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgHhUZt8j98&NR=1

That was awsome. Data laughing at lasers LOL
The first one is very biased toward SW. I posted a comment (manoljo)
The second is obviously more realistic.
EDIT: Of course there is one huge problem with the second video. Data wouldn't be affected by the force like that.
EDIT: like I said on youtube, he could just encrypt everything, or, do any number of things; the destroyer would be easily disabled.

**Kittamaru** · 10-13-10, 10:30 PM

*grins* Oh look, little rice-cake deleted his post... too bad I already quoted him, so all the world can see what a nuisance he really is.

**~~ricrery~~** · 10-14-10, 05:43 PM

Originally Posted by Kittamaru

*grins* Oh look, little rice-cake deleted his post... too bad I already quoted him, so all the world can see what a nuisance he really is.

I never deleted it. I didn't even look here until now. Seems like your corrupt mods doing their typical business. Oh, and learn the simple kinetic energy formula.

**NMSquirrel** · 10-14-10, 05:52 PM

OMG..was just checking around to see which thread i am missing out on..

so far this thread has the most posts i have ever seen in one thread!

21,493! is this a record?

**Apocalypse2001** · 10-14-10, 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by NMSquirrel

OMG..was just checking around to see which thread i am missing out on..

so far this thread has the most posts i have ever seen in one thread!

21,493! is this a record?

probably. And a few hundred pages of it were spent on the luntic rambling of someone who has been mentioned on this page of the post

**Nexarc** · 10-14-10, 09:20 PM

or the same topic being discussed ad nauseam for twenty or so pages in a row, then an off topic conversation for three pages and back again for another six.

**Kittamaru** · 10-15-10, 01:39 AM

Originally Posted by ricrery

I never deleted it. I didn't even look here until now. Seems like your corrupt mods doing their typical business. Oh, and learn the simple kinetic energy formula.

*chuckles* Corrupt mods... lol... you are so precious! Yes you are!

**razordude** · 10-15-10, 02:24 PM

Originally Posted by ricrery

I never deleted it. I didn't even look here until now. Seems like your corrupt mods doing their typical business. Oh, and learn the simple kinetic energy formula.

Alright then, go back find that post and quote it and tell us what page it's on then...............Unless your lieing. Which you are.