-
06-26-07, 07:39 PM #5561
-
06-26-07, 07:40 PM #5562
One more comment, the hyperspace drive does't also seem very logical. It would look better in a modern art museum or a model of a quantum computer than being able to be used as an actuator of a FTL traveling device
-
06-26-07, 07:57 PM #5563
-
06-26-07, 09:00 PM #5564
-
06-26-07, 09:20 PM #5565Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
The first DS did have shields, however they were not overlapping shields. Small one man fighters could fit through the seam areas. The second DS would not have had this weakness, nor would it have had the vulnerable Thermal ports ports. There are advanced plans for a third DS in both Alliance and Imperial Remnnant hands. The space station after allis not based on any unique technologies. Most likely a Third Death Star was not built becuase of the near Impossibility of building one in secret. The second Death Star was only six months along in the project when the Emperor leaked the information. It probably still would have been discovered anyway and come under attack.
Second you have not proved a single thing about the Turbolaser, other than you have no clue what you are talking about.
Finally the only reason that the Thermal port was discovered as a weakness was that the Alliance had a full blue print of the Battlestation and time to analyze it. How well s earth going to do when it comes out of hyperspace destroys the planets then hyperspaces back out. There would be no time for a detailed scan of any type.
-
06-26-07, 09:23 PM #5566
-
06-26-07, 09:31 PM #5567
-
06-26-07, 09:36 PM #5568Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Like I said before: "This is a post. If you want proper Grammar wait for the dissertation." Or you can pay me. If you are not willing to pay then STFU.
All of Trek shows and movies may be canon but that means you must admit that a 400 gigawatt blast can and will collapse the shields of a Galaxy class starship. I was trying to give you a way of accepting that fact and mitigating it in argument by showing that unless the attack in pinpoint (under 100 square centimeters) the 400 gigawatts does not really apply. Then you have to contend with shelds that can repel muliple 64 megaton strike. Of course you guys could not accept such a gift from me, as you are too wrapped up in vitrolic hatred of me and the fact that I have shown you up again and again.
Fine, I don't care.
Canon Source: TMG Episode True Q Galaxy class Warp Core produces 12 billion gigawatts or 1.2E19 watts per second
Canon Source: ICS: Attack of the Clones. Heavy Turbolaser has the equivalent firepower of 12.5 gigatons in one shot or 5.225E19 watts per 0.06666...seconds
Even if later models of the Warp core increase the power output of the Warp core by 300%, ST ships still out powered ~15 to one, by just one of the main guns of a SW capital ship.
-
06-26-07, 09:42 PM #5569
-
06-26-07, 09:45 PM #5570Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
We have seen no limits to the Jedi. ROTS proved that as Anaking and Obiwan were fighting just scant inches aboved a river of Lava. They should not have been able to breathe. But the thing is you have to prove he can, since you are the one who is claiming he can.
Yes, but he has not helped in any WAR type sistuation. He has not helped in a single conflict with Mortals, even the Borg. Thus the burden is on you to prove he would. Which will be hard as the past indicates to him he won't care.Prove Q wouldn't- he has already done multiple things to speed the advancement of Humanity. The first meeting with the Borg taught Picard hubris for instance. Q has helped Picard out before, even if it was indirect. On Voyager, for example, it's obvious Q has a thing for Janeway as well as being grateful to her for her (albeit not so willing) help in teaching him to be a father.
Then Mace would easily get rid of Q. Hell, Yoda could do it as little green men are scarier.The only person to ever really get "rid" of Q was Sisko... and that's cause you just don't screw with a big angry black man, as both Sisko and Windu proved.
Interfered to benefit mankind? Only Three times and each of those times was a test. He has NOT ONCE interfered in a war and there fore won't especially a war between humans.So prove to me, Scott, that Q would not interfere when he has done so multiple times already. Prove to me his power is limited and that it stems from technology as you so much love to claim. I have yet to see any evidence to substantiate this claim.
Unles you are paying me to respond, STFU about the grammar.And, once more, absolute grammar please. Unless English is your second language, you have NO reason for mistakes.
-
06-26-07, 09:49 PM #5571Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
-
06-26-07, 09:53 PM #5572
-
06-26-07, 09:55 PM #5573Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
When someone mentions a barrage of that type the assumption is one time for each cannon. Especially since they have a 2 second recharge rate for barel cooling and the guns dedicated reactor to recharge the capacitor. Don't you pay attention to little details like that?
However if you want to question the firepower we could always decide to claim only one Turret is fired at a time giving a firepower of 100 gigatons which screws you over even more. So do the world a favor, quit bitching and accept canon and small concessions we make for you.
-
06-26-07, 09:56 PM #5574
-
06-26-07, 09:58 PM #5575
-
06-26-07, 09:58 PM #5576
-
06-26-07, 09:59 PM #5577Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Hey, I happen to be a fan of Star trek too. I just hate that these idiots fly in the face of everything Gene and his staff have created.
Truth is even Gene Roddenberry knew that all out war Star Wars would crush Star Trek. Hell, the man admitted if it wasn't for Star Wars there would be no Star Trek Movies or any series beyond TOS.
-
06-26-07, 10:03 PM #5578
-
06-26-07, 10:04 PM #5579Minister of Technology
- Posts
- 4,149
Hello? How the hell do you think the Station got to Alderaan or Yavin?
Second the Trubolaser stats are canon figures from the EU which in no way comes into conflict with the movies. therefore it is canon.
BTW I do not respond to Hellblade8's posts becuase once I prove one thing he switches to another argument where I trounce him yet again and then he goes back to the first. Of course Hellblade8 is not his first moniker and I have been fighting him and his sock puppetry for some time.
-
06-26-07, 10:04 PM #5580
Similar Threads
-
By Fettman in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 10-18-11, 02:02 PMReplies: 33
-
By USS Athens in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-16-10, 04:47 PMReplies: 291
-
By superstring01 in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 03-11-10, 01:57 PMReplies: 60
-
By Orleander in forum SciFi & FantasyLast Post: 07-11-09, 08:33 PMReplies: 27
-
By Asguard in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 09-13-08, 02:15 AMReplies: 0


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks