Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: my word!!

  1. #1

    my word!!

    for the day is...theorum

    i have'nt a clue as to why i am in this particular wiki page

    equally clueless as to why in the wiki at all
    mustta have made a wrong turn

    the eyeballs engaged and came across this...

    In mathematics, a theorem is a statement, often stated in natural language, that can be proved on the basis of explicitly stated or previously agreed assumptions.

    and got confused
    but but
    dont we spit on theories?



    the internet spits on novelty and weak attempts at originality

    ps: i see chroot coadministering our sister forum along with greg


    pps: coadministering or co-administering?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
    for the day is...theorum
    Fortunately you spelled it right the second time.
    In mathematics, a theorem is a statement, often stated in natural language, that can be proved on the basis of explicitly stated or previously agreed assumptions.
    Good definition. Remember that mathematics is not a science. Its theories are not derived from empirical observation like scientific theories. They are derived from pure abstraction.


    This is not an observation on how the universe works. It is one of the rules in an abstract system we invented to help us observe and understand the universe.
    and got confused but but don't we spit on theories?
    I don't know who you mean by "we." This website is a gathering place for scientists, future scientists and people who want to discuss or learn science. Theories are respected here, so long as they follow the rules of their particular discipline. On the hard science boards like physics, a theory must adhere to the scientific method: a prediction of how the universe will work, derived by logical reasoning from observations of how it has worked in the past, peer-reviewed, disprovable but not provable, formed by rejecting the simplest explanation before moving on the the more complex ones, etc. In the soft sciences like linguistics, psychology, and sociology, the rules are looser, but still a theory must be derived logically from some sort of evidence, rather than instinct, imagination or authority, it must be peer-reviewed, and it must be disprovable. Math, not being a science, has its own rules. Its theories are based purely on thoughts and reasoning, and they can be proven true. But they are still peer-reviewed and they can also be proven false.
    pps: coadministering or co-administering?
    As an editor I use the standard that if the word is well established, like "coworker," then it doesn't require a hyphen. Otherwise it does. When in doubt, use the hyphen for clarity. I would certainly use it here.

    Whenever I see the word coworker I think it's somebody who makes a living by orking cows. Nasty, dangerous work!

Similar Threads

  1. By alexb123 in forum Computer Science & Culture
    Last Post: 12-22-07, 11:48 AM
    Replies: 6
  2. By cjard in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 09-14-07, 05:08 AM
    Replies: 0
  3. By alexander_670 in forum Science & Society
    Last Post: 07-10-07, 05:54 AM
    Replies: 13
  4. By WildBlueYonder in forum Physics & Math
    Last Post: 07-03-07, 09:23 PM
    Replies: 3
  5. By Lord Hillyer in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 02-23-07, 07:46 PM
    Replies: 0


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts