Black Holes Answer for Dark Matter?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Reiku, Oct 17, 2007.

  1. Reiku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,238
    It seems to me that the hidden dimensions, curled into very tight spaces, are in fact perfect micro-chambers, to contain the idea I had in mind concerning the gravitational field’s need for the presence of dark matter; I propose that it doesn’t. Instead of saying that the mysterious matter is the extra source, created mathematically by scientists to answer for the gravitational source of the universe, saying that it might be stuck inside the hidden dimensions of spacetime. But why should it be this exotic substance? Why can’t it just be something we are struggling with at the moment already? Like a diluted sea of microscopic extremal black holes?

    An extremal black hole will have a ground state of mass that is proportional to its charge and angular momentum. This means that the black hole will either radiate particle pairs at a much slower rate, or they won’t emit the particles at all. The following equation describes the curvature of spacetime round a massive spherical body;

    ds^2=-c^2(1-2GM/c^2r)dt^2+(1-2GM/c^2)^-1_dr^2+r^2d^2

    The curvature produced by this weak sea of black holes i predict would sufficient to stabilize the gravitational forces needed. Black holes are predicted to form from the collapsed states of certain large stars, about several times larger than our star. They do so, because of gravitational acceleration, given by the formula;

    a=(GM_ ß)/d^2=mg

    Remember, a free falling object will have the force of gravity totally cancelled out as it’s that weak. We know that from Newton’s Force Equation is derived as f= ma, where this also shows an inertial system to derive the acceleration due to gravity, and thus;

    g=(GM)/d^2

    So the gravitational acceleration is the mass of a gravitationally warped object M, and the distance d from it. Also, instead of working out the mass of a black hole in the conventional way, you could measure it against the gravitational acceleration formula, by;

    M=gd^2/G

    We use the same method to work out the mass of the earth. The G is Newtons universal gravitational constant (6.7×10-11 m3/(kg sec2). We find the Earth's mass = 9.8 × (6.4×106)2 / (6.7 × 10-11) kilograms = 6.0 × 1024 kilograms. To make an accurate measure of the gravitation being produced in the hidden dimension, we would need to take the content of the proposed dark matter, which is about 25% of matter in the universe (as predicted by NASA), and spread that out in a uniformal distribution throughout the dimension, take the gravitational affects of the black holes, but we are dealing here with very small calculations for each extremal black hole. We would need to work out how many of these micro black holes would be needed, and if they represent particles, then the sea of black holes would have a finite number of particles consistent.
    The gravitational acceleration, is then simply given as g=(GM)/d^2, and calculating the mass is gd^2/G.

    To take into account the mass of this black hole sea, we can estimate the amount of matte required, proportional to the what the theory predicts. Dark matter coves 25% of all matter, so, in theory the same amount of matter would be needed to make up the gravity needed in the sea. Even just as important, we would need to scale the density D of the universe, against the radius 10^26, and measure how diluted this matter really is. We can measure the density, and radius of a black hole in a series of proportionalities. The radius R of a black hole, even a micro black hole is directly proportional to its mass (R- M). And the density of a black hole is found to be given by its mass divided by its volume (D=M/V).

    I work out that there will be something like 10^9 particles that make up the black hole sea. This would mean that there is about a billion more particles making this sea, than there is the normal baryons found in matter. Neutrinos might be so lightweight that they can travel between dimensions. They would also naturally form under the relativistic effects on the energy deposition rate via neutrino pair annihilation near the rotation axis of a black hole normally, but here we are talking about a Kerr black hole. And also, these black holes won’t radiate photons or neutrinos. They’re stable radiatively.
    Electron neutrinos or even antineutrinos are generated whenever neutrons change into protons or protons into neutrons, the two forms of beta decay. As we already know, about 50 trillion neutrinos pass through our bodies in just under one second! They originally came from sun. They are a gravitational king for this matter, and are themselves classed as being a form of dark matter. A source of frame-dragging at a very small scale would radiate from this sea of black holes. The black holes will spin at the speed of light, just like macroscopic black holes. The Centripetal force is proportional to the centrifugal force (F=mrW^2).

    A black hole need to be of Planck Mass at smallest size 2x10^-8kg. The Compton Wavelength given as lambda=h/mc=2pi(h/mc) of a black hole is proportional to its Schwartzchild Radius 1 / (2M − r); very small black holes are very hot. This is because the decrease in size and magnification of density makes these little things extremely hot. A typical micro black hole would have a temperature of 10^16 K, which is 200 GeV.

    Might the curvature produced from the extremal black holes be seeping into the other dimensions, producing the gravitation thought to be answered through the use of Dark Matter?

    Reiku :m:
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Is Dark Matter pseudoscience. Then by inference it is pseudo matter....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Reiku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,238
    I suppose it is. Its hypothetical. And it is somehow not well-accepted.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. ghost7584 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    374
    I have real trouble believing that black holes really exist. If matter was compressed into such a small space by gravity, wouldn't other elements fuse together producing fusion energy and blow the size of the collapsing body out to a bigger size? Is hydrogen the only thing that fuses and produces fusion energy? Under such great pressures assumed to be produced by black holes, I think any element would produce fusion energy and the size of the collapsing star would get big again---so no black hole.
     
  8. Reiku Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,238
    Black Holes should exist, for both quantum physics, astrophysics and relativity of course being its creator, all predict their existence. This is because final long, eyewaterng equations find a series of formulae that describe a particle curving spacetime to a certain point, the ''critical density,'' and unable to fight the attraction of its own energy, forces back on itself, and becomes a time-reversed property.

    Now... i don't believe we will ever find or see one, because we possibly couldn't. Afterall, microscopic extremal black holes, around 10^9 particles are constituting micro-singularities forming gravitational stresses in the Einstein-de Sitter Spacetime, radiating looped stringed gravitons, flowing more free than a dove.

    This gravity will be infinite in potential, but finite at any given real time as measured upon consequence. They would distort 500TeV amounts of the Zero-Point Field spread throughout all of our universal spacetime, which has a radius of 10^26m and approx. 10^80 particles - but theseare what we can observe. I think all tigether we might be talking 10^80 raised to the power of eight (N^8). We see such a very small amount of the observable cosmos.
    For instance, each passing second, time will move through all matter peridically at the speed of light (This is true by the way). But the observable universe is rushing away from us at superluminal speeds, so... ... all we can say is, ''what now?''
    The force seeping into our universe is suffice to answer for distant galaxies, so long as big bang theories are right... including relativity.
     
  9. kaneda Actual Cynic Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,334
    ghost. A neutron star can produce a gravity field where 2/3 light speed is needed to escape it so a black hole is merely 50% more than that so that light cannot escape.
     

Share This Page