09-19-07, 02:57 PM #41
Its common news.
In August 1991, UN arms inspectors - UNSCOM - compiled a list of companies which had supplied technology to the Iraqi chemical and biological weapons program. The list was not made public, but governments can obtain information on the involvement of companies from their own country upon special request to the UN.(5) The German, US, UK, French, Russian, and Chinese governments should release the list of companies which supplied technology to the Iraqi chemical, biological and other weapons programs.
German companies have been subjected to criminal investigations on suspicion of violation of the arms embargo against Iraq. The UK and the USA have been accused of supporting the Iraqi chemical and biological weapons program through the sale of chemicals and technology.
"British firms sold thousands of kilos of the basic ingredients of nerve and mustard gas to Iraq and Iran last year, the Department of Trade confirmed yesterday... the Department's figures show that 2,000 kilograms of methyl phosphonyl difluoride has been exported to Iraq. This is the basic ingredient of the nerve gas Sarin... British firms also sold 38,000 kilograms of dimethyl methylphosphonate and other Sarin ingredients to Iraq." Andrew Beitch, the Guardian, 6 April 1984.
Four years after this article was published, in March 1988, an estimated 5,000 people were deliberately killed and thousands wounded as a result of chemical weapon attacks by Iraqi forces on the town of Halabja in Northern Iraq. Most of the victims were civilians, many of them children and women.
Detailed list of US companies:
09-19-07, 03:01 PM #42
Sorry for not clarifying that. I shall now; The U.S. has never used biological or chemical weapons in combat, on another country.
Did you miss this part?
The non-profit American Type Culture Collection and the Centers for Disease Control sold or sent biological samples to Iraq under Saddam Hussein up until 1989, which Iraq claimed it needed for medical research.
09-19-07, 03:12 PM #43Originally Posted by mikenostic
09-19-07, 03:14 PM #44
Most of the tests made public today used the benign bacterium bacillus globigii to simulate how biological weapons agents would spread through the hold of a ship.
None of the tests were done to gauge the human response to chemical or biological weapons, Kilpatrick said. In each test, military personnel were protected from the agents by shelter, protective clothing or vaccinations.
Under the Geneva Convention, IHL, and the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction White Phoprous is a legal use item,
From the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, Article II (definitions) :
"Chemical Weapons" means the following, together or separately:
(a) Toxic chemicals and their precursors, except where intended for purposes not prohibited under this Convention, as long as the types and quantities are consistent with such purposes;
(b) Munitions and devices, specifically designed to cause death or other harm through the toxic properties of those toxic chemicals specified in subparagraph (a), which would be released as a result of the employment of such munitions and devices;
(c) Any equipment specifically designed for use directly in connection with the employment of munitions and devices specified in subparagraph (b).
09-19-07, 03:17 PM #45
09-19-07, 03:20 PM #46
Dang. I should have clarified even more. We've never used biological or chemical weapons on personnel, with the intent to use them on personnel.
09-19-07, 03:21 PM #47
The US is in the process of incinerating all of it's chemical weapons at Umatilla. They have already destroyed about 30%.
09-19-07, 03:29 PM #48
And yes, I know agent orange wasn't (well, officially) meant to be a human toxin. Whether the US government knew of the health risks involved is, as I said, up to debate. It's been established that the chemical manufacturers did.
09-19-07, 03:36 PM #49
All you have shown is that the U.S. identified all site that contained chemical weapons, what you failed to do is point out that, the U.S. has been in the process of destroying those Chemical weapons since 2000,
Syria's chemical weapons program dates back to the early 1970s when they first ... the US destroy more than 98 percent of its chemical weapons stockpile. ...
imson Center - Stimson Center Releases Progress Report On US ...
Stimson Center Releases Progress Report on US Program to Destroy Its Chemical Weapons. CONTACT: Elizabeth Blumenthal (202) 223-5956, ext 3466 ...
We haven't been trying to mount them on Missiles, we have removed them from the inventory, in fact we have been helping Russia, Albania, Libya, to destroy their stock piles to, so what the hell is Syria and Iran trying to do? Mount their Chemical weapons on a IRBM, a Scud, yes S.A.M. more vomit from you, all is fair if it is done in the name of Islam and Arab Victimhood, yes what kind of Victim do you have when they arm long range offensive weapons with Chemical Agents.
09-19-07, 03:49 PM #50All you have shown is that the U.S. identified all site that contained chemical weapons
Shocking, seems we have to know where they are in order to destroy them.
09-19-07, 04:23 PM #51
they weren't designing a weapon. they were trying to make the weapon war ready -- to mount it on a missile. this is a hostile act. why would Syria do that? any act that upsets the scale of power is antagonistic
09-19-07, 04:28 PM #52
The spec op troops were the target 'painters'.
Not to mention the flyovers of the president's house back when they invaded Lebanon last year and numerous other things they've done.
Hell, I'm surprised it's taken them this long to do whatever it is they're doing since it's pretty obvious we're gonna attack both Iran and Syria; at least now someone is preparing to put up a fight, unlike the joke of the first days of Iraq.
09-19-07, 07:55 PM #53
As well as explosive bombs the United States Air Force dropped a considerable number of incendiary devices. The most infamous of these was napalm, a mixture of petrol and a chemical thickner which produces a tough sticky gel that attaches itself to the skin. The igniting agent, white phosphorus, continues burning for a considerable amount of time. A reported three quarters of all napalm victims in Vietnam were burned through to the muscle and bone (fifth degree burns). The pain caused by the burning is so traumatic that it often causes death.
During the war about 10% of Vietnam was intensively sprayed with 72 million litres of chemicals, of which 66% was Agent Orange. Some of this landed on their own troops and soon after the war ended veterans began complaining about serious health problems. There was also a high incidence of their children being born limbless or with Down's syndrome and spina bifida. The veterans sued the defoliant manufacturers and this was settled out of court in 1984 by the payment of $180 million.
The TCCD dioxin used in Agent Orange seeped into the soil and water supply, and therefore into the food chain. In this way it passed from mother to foetus in the womb. In Vietnam the dioxide remains in the soil and is now damaging the health of the grandchildren of the war's victims.
A report published in 2003 claimed that 650,000 people in Vietnam were still suffering from chronic conditions as a result of the chemicals dropped on the country during the war. Since the war the Vietnamese Red Cross has registered an estimated one million people disabled by Agent Orange. It is estimated that 500,000 people in Vietnam have died from the numerous health problems created by these chemical weapons.
09-19-07, 08:07 PM #54
Originally Posted by mikenostic
Also in Vietnam.
The US has also supplied several of its proxy and colonial armies - such as Saddam's - with the ingredients and other technology for chemical weapons (supplying the ingrediants is supplying the weapons - they have to be made fresh before actual use. They don't store easily or well.)
Iran may be getting desperate - they may have actually believed themselves they could make nukes in time to forestall the coming storm, up until they got into the program and found out why it takes a large industrial power to do that.
Or they may have been "helping" Syria the way the US "helped" Saddam. Iranians enjoy the distinction of having been direct victims of US supplied chemical weapons,including sarin. That may have reduced any moral or ethical objections to them they had.
09-19-07, 08:21 PM #55
09-19-07, 08:33 PM #56
09-19-07, 08:36 PM #57
Wasn't this thread about a Syria-Iran missile test?
Why all the discussion about the US?
09-19-07, 08:43 PM #58
09-19-07, 09:09 PM #59
WP is White Phosphorus. It is not specifically listed among "chemical weapons", and the US has refused to amend the official treaty lists or sign treaties banning its use against people. The US has also denied using it against people in combat, until caught red-handed.
I leave it to you to judge whether WP used against people is a "chemical weapon" in fact:
Originally Posted by wiki
09-19-07, 09:18 PM #60
By madanthonywayne in forum World EventsLast Post: 01-02-08, 01:14 PMReplies: 444
By Exhumed in forum World EventsLast Post: 09-13-07, 02:07 PMReplies: 14
By Brian Foley in forum World EventsLast Post: 05-17-07, 03:09 AMReplies: 26
By Raven in forum World EventsLast Post: 01-19-06, 12:46 AMReplies: 44
By Kiwi123 in forum World EventsLast Post: 11-08-05, 08:54 PMReplies: 26