Space Shuttle Heat Shield Solution

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by thecollage, Aug 21, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. thecollage Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Why not make the heath shield out of Aerogel. The properties indicate it holds up to 2192 Degrees F. It weighs considerably less and may even be more likely to trap foam falling from the boosters as opposed to causing a gouge.

    I know it will be costly. But what is a few Billion to NASA.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    Because there's no way to attach it, no glue has been made as yet.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    They'll be working on it.
    That stuff is wonderful.
    If they can find a cheap way to make it
    the spin offs will be bigger than any they have ever had.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    The tiles they have now are even better because they can be glued on. It isn't going to be long before the space shuttle is no longer be our primary flight vehicle and the new rocket carrying vehicle will be in operation in 2010.
     
  8. oreodont I am God Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    520
    true:

    Except 'is scheduled to be in operation'

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Klippymitch Thinker Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    699
    They could put an retractable outwards cone on the space shuttle like this:

    Normal mode

    [shuttle]>

    Reentry mode

    [shuttle]<

    The Cone collects the air in front of the shuttle and pushes it through it's center hole into a distributor. The air is then distributed back outside to cool the cone.
     
  10. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    Only for 2 more years then off to the twilight zone with it.
     
  11. Nasor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,231
    The shuttle's outer surface reaches over 3000 F.
     
  12. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
  13. Nasor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,231
    Also, an important point that people should remember here is that it's not enough to have a material with a really high melting point - you also need the material to be a fantastic insulator, so that even though the material on the outer surface of the shuttle is thousands of degrees, the heat doesn't penetrate inside the shuttle to melt everything. The aluminum that the shuttle’s frame is made of will begin to soften at just 175 C. So you need a material that can be 3000 C on one side, but only sub-175 on the other.
     
  14. cat2only Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    334
    How about shooting another one up to them?
     
  15. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    Because there's a special way for the tiles to be glued on. It requires that they be in a room temperature to get dry and adhere properly. They can't replace them up there. They can only repair the hole but as yet no way has been found to do so in space.
     
  16. weed_eater_guy It ain't broke, don't fix it! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,516
    How about a giant, steerable upper-atmosphere parachute, the shuttle would slow down in the upper atmosphere and manipulate the chute lines to keep it aloft in thin air for as long as possible before the eventual decent. If this is done in the right region of the atmosphere, aerodynamic heating could be drastically minimized, eliminating the need for heat shielding! At least this is my theory, someone please shoot it down because there must be some reason why it hasn't been done yet

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    .
     
  17. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    air density is way too low
     
  18. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Easy - up high the atmosphere is too thin to make a chute work and deploying it in a thin atmosphere would let the shroud lines tangle before it got "inflated" enough to straighten them out - and by the time you're in sufficient density for the chute to be viable you're going too fast to deploy it.
     
  19. weed_eater_guy It ain't broke, don't fix it! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,516
    oh yeah the thing needs to open up..., what if it were rimmed with an inflatable ring hooked up to some CO2 canisters or something, like a life-raft? that would open it up all the way for use in the thin air, maybe?
     
  20. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    the parachutes just don't work at such altitude...extreme pressured balloons do however.
     
  21. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    But balloons work on the displacement principle - you've got to have a gas (and material) light enough to displace enough very thin air to make them worthwhile.
     
  22. USS Exeter unamerican american Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,482
    Helium balloons work at heights of up to 150,000 ft efficiently but I highly doubt their use in spacecraft. inflatables are simply impractical for that kind of use.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page