+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Space Shuttle Heat Shield Solution

  1. #1
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    430

    Space Shuttle Heat Shield Solution

    Why not make the heath shield out of Aerogel. The properties indicate it holds up to 2192 Degrees F. It weighs considerably less and may even be more likely to trap foam falling from the boosters as opposed to causing a gouge.

    I know it will be costly. But what is a few Billion to NASA.

  2. #2
    Be kind to yourself always. cosmictraveler's Avatar
    Posts
    29,594
    Because there's no way to attach it, no glue has been made as yet.

  3. #3
    All aboard, me Hearties! Captain Kremmen's Avatar
    Posts
    9,148
    They'll be working on it.
    That stuff is wonderful.
    If they can find a cheap way to make it
    the spin offs will be bigger than any they have ever had.

  4. #4
    Be kind to yourself always. cosmictraveler's Avatar
    Posts
    29,594
    The tiles they have now are even better because they can be glued on. It isn't going to be long before the space shuttle is no longer be our primary flight vehicle and the new rocket carrying vehicle will be in operation in 2010.

  5. #5
    true:

    Except 'is scheduled to be in operation'

  6. #6
    They could put an retractable outwards cone on the space shuttle like this:

    Normal mode

    [shuttle]>

    Reentry mode

    [shuttle]<

    The Cone collects the air in front of the shuttle and pushes it through it's center hole into a distributor. The air is then distributed back outside to cool the cone.

  7. #7
    Be kind to yourself always. cosmictraveler's Avatar
    Posts
    29,594
    Quote Originally Posted by oreodont View Post
    true:

    Except 'is scheduled to be in operation'
    Only for 2 more years then off to the twilight zone with it.

  8. #8
    Valued Senior Member
    Posts
    6,226
    Quote Originally Posted by thecollage View Post
    Why not make the heath shield out of Aerogel. The properties indicate it holds up to 2192 Degrees F.
    The shuttle's outer surface reaches over 3000 F.

  9. #9
    All aboard, me Hearties! Captain Kremmen's Avatar
    Posts
    9,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasor View Post
    The shuttle's outer surface reaches over 3000 F.
    Point accepted.
    It doesn't have a simple solution .See:
    http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/...f/sts_sys.html

  10. #10
    Valued Senior Member
    Posts
    6,226
    Also, an important point that people should remember here is that it's not enough to have a material with a really high melting point - you also need the material to be a fantastic insulator, so that even though the material on the outer surface of the shuttle is thousands of degrees, the heat doesn't penetrate inside the shuttle to melt everything. The aluminum that the shuttle’s frame is made of will begin to soften at just 175 C. So you need a material that can be 3000 C on one side, but only sub-175 on the other.

  11. #11
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    334
    How about shooting another one up to them?

  12. #12
    Be kind to yourself always. cosmictraveler's Avatar
    Posts
    29,594
    Quote Originally Posted by cat2only View Post
    How about shooting another one up to them?
    Because there's a special way for the tiles to be glued on. It requires that they be in a room temperature to get dry and adhere properly. They can't replace them up there. They can only repair the hole but as yet no way has been found to do so in space.

  13. #13
    It ain't broke, don't fix it! weed_eater_guy's Avatar
    Posts
    1,516
    How about a giant, steerable upper-atmosphere parachute, the shuttle would slow down in the upper atmosphere and manipulate the chute lines to keep it aloft in thin air for as long as possible before the eventual decent. If this is done in the right region of the atmosphere, aerodynamic heating could be drastically minimized, eliminating the need for heat shielding! At least this is my theory, someone please shoot it down because there must be some reason why it hasn't been done yet .

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by weed_eater_guy View Post
    How about a giant, steerable upper-atmosphere parachute, the shuttle would slow down in the upper atmosphere and manipulate the chute lines to keep it aloft in thin air for as long as possible before the eventual decent. If this is done in the right region of the atmosphere, aerodynamic heating could be drastically minimized, eliminating the need for heat shielding! At least this is my theory, someone please shoot it down because there must be some reason why it hasn't been done yet .
    air density is way too low

  15. #15
    Heute der Enteteich... Oli's Avatar
    Posts
    11,890
    Easy - up high the atmosphere is too thin to make a chute work and deploying it in a thin atmosphere would let the shroud lines tangle before it got "inflated" enough to straighten them out - and by the time you're in sufficient density for the chute to be viable you're going too fast to deploy it.

  16. #16
    It ain't broke, don't fix it! weed_eater_guy's Avatar
    Posts
    1,516
    oh yeah the thing needs to open up..., what if it were rimmed with an inflatable ring hooked up to some CO2 canisters or something, like a life-raft? that would open it up all the way for use in the thin air, maybe?

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by weed_eater_guy View Post
    oh yeah the thing needs to open up..., what if it were rimmed with an inflatable ring hooked up to some CO2 canisters or something, like a life-raft? that would open it up all the way for use in the thin air, maybe?
    the parachutes just don't work at such altitude...extreme pressured balloons do however.

  18. #18
    Heute der Enteteich... Oli's Avatar
    Posts
    11,890
    Quote Originally Posted by weed_eater_guy View Post
    oh yeah the thing needs to open up..., what if it were rimmed with an inflatable ring hooked up to some CO2 canisters or something, like a life-raft? that would open it up all the way for use in the thin air, maybe?
    But balloons work on the displacement principle - you've got to have a gas (and material) light enough to displace enough very thin air to make them worthwhile.

  19. #19
    unamerican american USS Exeter's Avatar
    Posts
    2,482
    Helium balloons work at heights of up to 150,000 ft efficiently but I highly doubt their use in spacecraft. inflatables are simply impractical for that kind of use.

Similar Threads

  1. By Mosheh Thezion in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 12-14-12, 01:30 PM
    Replies: 47
  2. By Kaiduorkhon in forum General Science & Technology
    Last Post: 10-30-10, 02:02 PM
    Replies: 106
  3. By GuessWho in forum Earth Science
    Last Post: 08-30-07, 05:17 PM
    Replies: 13
  4. By Kaiduorkhon in forum General Science & Technology
    Last Post: 03-15-07, 11:27 PM
    Replies: 0
  5. By draqon in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology
    Last Post: 01-15-07, 08:33 AM
    Replies: 11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •