Welcome Back Darksidz

**shorty_37** · 06-21-07, 10:40 PM

WELCOME BACK!!!

I think your ban is lifted ........Share with us what you did on your time off. Did you make a list of new POLLS for us?

I will make a POLL ..........How many of you missed DArk for last few days?

**S.A.M.** · 06-21-07, 10:44 PM

He was banned?

**fishtail** · 06-21-07, 10:45 PM

How, female less person.

**shorty_37** · 06-21-07, 10:49 PM

Originally Posted by fishtail

How, female less person.

huh?

**shorty_37** · 06-21-07, 10:49 PM

Originally Posted by S.A.M.

He was banned?

don't play all confused

**BenTheMan** · 06-21-07, 10:58 PM

Why did he get banned? That dude seriously needs to get laid.

**S.A.M.** · 06-21-07, 10:59 PM

Originally Posted by shorty_37

don't play all confused

I honestly had no idea, perhaps because he's on other forums I frequent *sigh*

**shorty_37** · 06-21-07, 11:03 PM

James R

In case there is any confusion, darksidZz was banned (3 days) for this:

“ Originally Posted by darksidZz
You know these women whoever they are deserve to be banged for defamation of moral integrity, why don't they go get real jobs and stop looking for an easy way out. I would make fun of them too if I were able, they're whores. ”

Notice how this repeats the very offence for which the women are suing. darksidZz himself could be sued for libel for this post.

“ Originally Posted by darksidZz
"According to court documents, a user on the site named "STANFORDtroll" began a thread in 2005 seeking to warn Yale students about one of the women in the suit, entitled "Stupid Bitch to Enter Yale Law." Another threatened to rape and sodomize her, the documents said."

My kinda site!!!!!!!!!!!! ”

If this is darksidZz's preferred kind of site, and this is the behaviour he likes to see, then he now has 3 days off from sciforums to go looking for those kinds of sites.

3 days is letting him off very lightly, by the way. I'm hoping he will take something useful away from this experience.

**fishtail** · 06-21-07, 11:04 PM

Originally Posted by shorty_37

huh?

Sitting bull.

**Killjoy** · 06-21-07, 11:35 PM

Originally Posted by shorty_37

How many of you missed DArk for last few days?

What's there to miss ?

Originally Posted by James R

3 days is letting him off very lightly, by the way. I'm hoping he will take something useful away from this experience.

Foolish optimism, IMHO.

Didn't learn anything from the first one, did he ?

**shorty_37** · 06-22-07, 07:25 AM

ahhhhhhhhhhh come on darksidz is some good entertainment sometimes.

**alexb123** · 06-22-07, 08:25 AM

Originally Posted by shorty_37

ahhhhhhhhhhh come on darksidz is some good entertainment sometimes.

Darkside this a positive sign. Your one comment about how slim she is, away from pulling

**Baron Max** · 06-22-07, 08:42 AM

Originally Posted by S.A.M.

I honestly had no idea, perhaps because he's on other forums I frequent *sigh*

Other forums??? Geez, you're on this one 24 hours a day, and now you admit to being on others as well?

Shit, Sam, now I'm fully, totally convinced that you're a paid, professional propagandist!!!

Baron Max

**S.A.M.** · 06-22-07, 08:57 AM

Originally Posted by Baron Max

Other forums??? Geez, you're on this one 24 hours a day, and now you admit to being on others as well?

Shit, Sam, now I'm fully, totally convinced that you're a paid, professional propagandist!!!

Baron Max

I have an entire staff at my back and call, taking down my ideas in shorthand and disseminating it to the www.
And they are all Americans

*eerie music*

**~~draqon~~** · 06-22-07, 09:07 AM

once again just like Stalin/Hitler/Mao, James R. has the power and uses it on those below his feet.

**BenTheMan** · 06-22-07, 09:09 AM

Notice how this repeats the very offence for which the women are suing. darksidZz himself could be sued for libel for this post.

I think that this would be a tough row to hoe. darksidZz made some general comments about people he doesn't really know, whereas the original poster in the original thread in the article claimed explicit knowledge of these women.

The two comments are totally different. If this is really what got darksidZz banned, then I would point out that people have made worse comments and gotten away with it. Scroll down in this thread to post #4:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=67208

How is it that darksidZz can get banned for his statements agains two or three people, but people like spuriousmonkey don't get banned for statements that wish death on thousands of people???

**~~draqon~~** · 06-22-07, 09:14 AM

Originally Posted by BenTheMan

How is it that darksidZz can get banned for his statements agains two or three people, but people like spuriousmonkey don't get banned for statements that wish death on thousands of people???

...

he who holds the power gets away with anything. In the end all fall into ash.

**leopold** · 06-22-07, 09:36 AM

Originally Posted by BenTheMan

How is it that darksidZz can get banned for his statements agains two or three people, but people like spuriousmonkey don't get banned for statements that wish death on thousands of people???

maybe the moderation is getting tired of his spamming and trolling threads with his "i'm so horney" horseshit. frankly i've heard it so often i'm ready to puke.