No Such Thing As A Singularity

Science is seeking an irreducable, indivisable entity, which will be a common denominator of all matter, namely what is referred to as a Singularity. IMHO, this is not a premise which has not happened as yet and awaiting more advancement and scientific vocab elevation - but that it is a faulty premise: it is not possible. IMHO, all things began as a Duality, including all original first cause of life forms. The reasoning here is that the universe is an intergrated system - nullfying the possibility of a Singularity. Nothing happens with one - everything can and does happen only with two or more than one as its start-up base.

This is vindicated scientifically, logically, philosophically and theologically.


Pineapples, stars and automobiles don't start with a singularity. It takes 2 to tango.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please translate your post into English!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Then I'm sure you'll have no problem doing so...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"...this is not a premise which has not happened as yet and awaiting..."

Seems you are having trouble with tenses - along with several other basic things.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Would you please tell us how you managed, in your fairly short lifetime, to discover that thousands of serious scientists (who have been active for many, many years each) are completely wrong?

 

I think Unified Field Theory is something completely different from the idea of a singularity.

 

If the moderators have any integrity at all, they will move this to the pseudo science forum as quickly as possible.

 

I think that there is no such thing as BenTheMan.

 

You and IamJosheph are equally wrong, then

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Moderators? Integrity? Surely you jest?

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well....a guy can dream.

If this doesn't qualify as pseudo science I don't know what does.

 

Why?
Why not show him he's wrong?
Or is it easier to say "you're wrong, to the pit you go"?

I really don't understand your obsession with moving bad science to the pseudo science. In real science, bad science is shown to be wrong, not ignored out of dogmatic principle.

 

Whatever man. If you can't read this post and see there is absolutely NOTHING scientific about it (except for possibly a few buzz words), then you're blind. Not only is it abundantly obvious that this guy (girl) doesn't understand the first thing about physics, and he justifies his reasoning in this statement "This is vindicated scientifically, logically, philosophically and theologically.", the latter half of which is CLEARLY pseudo science.

Ugh. If I thought there were a chance in hell that he'd admit that he were wrong (even if I showed him he were wrong), I would try.

You haven't talked to enough crackpots.

And besides, what's the point of having forums called "Real science" and "fake science" if you're affraid to use them. Why is it ok for moderators to move the "Intelligent design" posts to the pseudo science forums but not trash like this?

And please, explain to me the intricacies of "real science". I would love to hear your opinion on this matter.

 

I reread, well actually, read, his whole post now. Alright, I agree, off to pseudoscience with him (duality? wtf).

 

this was my response exactly

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

No need: scientists have tried desperately, but found no Singularity, tho they're still looking. :shrug:

 

Agreed. UFT is closer to the intergration factor.

 

Why so - my premise is a science based POV only. This despite that it is also the premise of genesis (OT), it is also clearly very scientific and fully vindicated today.

The fact that a singularity has never been witnessed anywhere in the universe is not the evidence I posit: rather, I see it as illogical and pointless: a singularity is an impossibility.

 

Not a scientific answer. Perhaps it is coded?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Oh, really?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Perhaps you should read up a bit more on current cosmology. There have been several singularities located and precisely plotted.

That raises two questions: do you actually know what a singularity is and have you really made any effort to study cosmology????