-
09-19-06, 09:20 PM #161Schwat?
- Posts
- 2,515
What's questionable about my sources? It is not conjecture dude. This is science.
Originally Posted by cole gray
-
09-19-06, 09:27 PM #162Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
White civilization is declining because White reproduction is low and we are filling our countries with incompatible cultures (and lower IQs) to prop up a socialist welfare state pyramid scheme that requires a rapidly ever expanding population to keep from collapsing.
Originally Posted by cole grey
Idiot, the war on Iraq is not an "imperialistic adventure." If it was, the very least we would be doing is taking the fucking oil for ourselves instead of paying full price for it like chumps. The Africans which I'm sure you think we "disenfranchised" were living in the fucking stone age when we first contacted them. The slaves in America lived better in America than those left behind and their descendants are the most prosperous Black people in the world.
As for the IQ test, the article I posted mentioned that Blacks do worse on culturally unbiased questions than the "culturally biased" ones. Speaking of which, why do poor Asians do better on these White tests than the average White person?
-
09-19-06, 09:28 PM #163this is a quote from the same resource -
Originally Posted by francois
"As many pro-slavery writers had predicted, blacks seemed to
have regressed in the years since emancipation. Individuals who as slaves
had been loyal and relatively productive had, as freedmen, descended into
shiftlessness. What was worse, white perceptions of them had changed from
regarding them as a seemingly benign presence to one now seen as immoral,
sullen, alien, and dangerous. "
Maybe this is due to the fact that they didn't get shit and were freed into a life of indentured servitude to landowners, and I love how it is the negative perception of blacks by whites that is worse than their state of affairs.
Better to have them blackies in chains rather than be seen as "alien" and "dangerous".
Come on - that ain't no scientific source.
-
09-19-06, 09:36 PM #164Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
While you don't agree with it, it is essentially true. Much of Black America has actually gotten worse since civil rights passed. Are you going to tell us that Black illigetimacy and crime haven't gone up since the sixties? Oh that's right, it's Whitey's fault that we give them affirmative action (discrimination against Whites) and things get worse for them (and us).
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 09:39 PM #165Look, you don't even know who these people are testing, where, when, how, or anything else, so stop pretending you have proof of your wild conjectures.
Originally Posted by Cunt Sudoku
The asians were probably given an IQ test in their schools, perhaps the asian schools teach kids about math and dialectical reasoning better than the white and black area schools, you don't know.
All in all, you are using secondhand information from racially biased sources to support views you have learned by rote from said sources, and I cry with laughter when you call me "idiot".
Unless you are Goethe or Leibniz reborn, you should stop using that word or anything similar when referencing me, for the sake of what is left of your own addled sensibilities.
-
09-19-06, 09:42 PM #166You - we let those blackies vote and it takes them more than 10 or 20 years to catch up to lifetimes of political advantage in the government - they must be real dumb.
Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
Me - hahaha, good joke. edit- you damn racist
-
09-19-06, 09:48 PM #167Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
Yeah, that's right, Whitey decided to "fix" the results to make Asians look superior and Blacks look dumb. I guess you are content to live in your make believe world where anyone can be a rocket scientist if they put their mind to it and work hard enough. That all Black societies are failures despite Whitey trying to prop them up in the real world of course is just a sad coincidence.
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 09:50 PM #168Schwat?
- Posts
- 2,515
Originally Posted by cole grey
Well, I don't know where you got that quoted text. I don't see it anywhere in that source I gave by Philippe Rushton's paper. Maybe you could elaborate further why it's an incredible source. I see your "Come on - that ain't no scientific source." as something of a non-sequitur.
-
09-19-06, 09:57 PM #169I got that from the same damn racist issue of that damn racist magazine that your link came from. Filled with blatantly unscientific pap - why would I think they check their sources?
Originally Posted by francois
As I said, that ain't no scientific paper - from what "scientific" sources did all the other "findings" in that chart arise?
Quack?
-
09-19-06, 10:00 PM #170Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
That would be about 40 years ago, and they are going backwards, not forwards.
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 10:01 PM #171Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
1. Human intelligence is largely hereditary.
Scientists have found that identical twins separated at birth and raised apart are almost identical in IQ, despite the fact that they had totally different environments. Remarkably, twins reared apart are as similar as identical twins reared together by the time they're adults. They also resemble one another strikingly in their mannerisms, the way they laugh, their likes and dislikes, phobias, temperament, sexual preference, educational achievement, income, conscientiousness, musical ability, sense of humor, whether they're criminals or law-abiding, and pretty much everything else that's ever been tested, even traits as peculiar as which vegetables they refuse to eat (Bouchard, 1993). The extent of their similarity amazes even the researchers and the twins themselves.
The primacy of genes is likewise demonstrated by adoption studies. Adopted children's IQs resemble those of their biological parents far more closely than they resemble those of their adoptive parents, who essentially provided them with their environments from the time of birth onwards. When adopted children are grown, there's no virtually resemblance between their IQs and those of their adoptive parents (Loehlin, Willerman, and Horn, 1987).
The dominant role of heredity in determining IQ is not a theory, it's an established fact, the consensus of hundreds of studies conducted in different times and places by many different researchers. But the public is largely unaware of this fact because the liberal media have told them repeatedly that most experts in IQ testing believe IQ is largely environmental. In reality, the majority of researchers in the field of intelligence testing believes heredity is the more important factor (Snyderman and Rothman, 1988).
-
09-19-06, 10:02 PM #172I said that the asian schools, where these tests are most assuredly given, might be better at teaching math and reasoning - I didn't say no nothing about whitey fixin' the test, my finely-feathered friend.
Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
And Egypt was a big, fucking, failure - ok, that sounds reel smart dood.
-
09-19-06, 10:04 PM #173Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
I love this, anything you find "racist" could not possibly be scientific or true.
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 10:09 PM #174That's right "more than 10 or 20 years" is what i said.
Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
IQ question - which number is greater than 10 and greater than 20?
a) 5 b) 1 c) 40 d) 9
Think it might take a few more years to go from getting hosed down in the street to becoming full participants in the millionaires club of american government?
Maybe.
And "backwards" from slavery and discriminatory regulation is a bold statement you make.
We shall see.
-
09-19-06, 10:10 PM #175Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
Egypt was not a Black society in its heyday, and in fact was destroyed by the increasing presence of Black Africans (the slaves) in its society, just like Portugal went down the toilet when the native population started mixing with its Black slaves. Tell an Egyptian in Egypt today that they are Black and they will probably kill you. Modern Egyptians look more like Arabs than Black people.
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 10:15 PM #176Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
You kind of implied that Blacks were just given the vote 10 or 20 years ago, anyway, even the liberal democrat Patrick Moynihan admitted the liberal "great society" liberal giveaways to Blacks was a total disaster for a lot of Black people. It was essentially a breeding program for the most stupid and criminal Black people in the country. How could anyone who saw New Orleans last year not think otherwise?
Originally Posted by cole grey
-
09-19-06, 10:18 PM #177No.
Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
When I find a magazine littered with unscientific bullshit, I am sceptical towards what I read in it that's all.
I have already provided examples of unsupportable findings - that blacks have an "agressive" personality, that blacks are interested in intellectual activity only as part of "the hustle", and also the idea that slaves remaining loyal to their masters is a step ahead of freedom - all from that same source.
You questioning me being sceptical of other things printed in the magazine is a joke.
You obviously don't approve of my scepticism in the face of these obviously unscientific ideas, and that says a lot about your ability to process information with a critical mind.
-
09-19-06, 10:23 PM #178Banned
- Posts
- 1,229
Blacks aren't aggressive? What the fuck planet do you live on? Shit, what is your exposure to Black people, watching the Cosby show?
Originally Posted by cole grey
http://www.amren.com/newstore/cart.p...color_of_crime
The Color Of Crime
Major Findings:
Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.
Crime Rates
Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
Interracial Crime
Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.
Gangs
Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.
Incarceration
Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.
-
09-19-06, 10:30 PM #179Anyone who thinks the right to vote was given in the eighties (along with free pink leg-warmers) is a dumb-ass.
Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
Also, people that think blacks received their rights in full and didn't have to fight through the sixties (that's right the 1960's) to get them is a dumb-ass.
It has been a very, very short time -- one generation basically -- since civil rights was the major issue in this country, and blacks were being killed for voting, and whites were being killed for helping them vote.
And they haven't gotten all their papers together to join the millionaires club yet - what animals... you damn racist.
Also, The whiteys fucked up the giveaway program.
What a surprise.
Bring up new orleans, and let's talk about who has rights. People with money and lawyers have rights. White black or chinese, it doesn't matter - money talks.
-
09-19-06, 10:33 PM #180Stop right there at blatant lie #1. I have seen it in action. I have seen differences in police action which can only be based on racism.
Originally Posted by Cunt Sudoku
Not to mention the thousands of reports and eyewitnesses testifying otherwise.
When you read a blatant lie, doesn't that make most people stop and consider what they are reading.
You don't obviously, you just swallow it down like a good drone.
Similar Threads
-
By Matthew Brady in forum Human ScienceLast Post: 07-27-10, 08:01 AMReplies: 98
-
By 85681356 in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & CosmologyLast Post: 04-30-09, 06:53 AMReplies: 6
-
By Fraggle Rocker in forum Human ScienceLast Post: 06-26-07, 02:47 PMReplies: 178
-
By genep in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 06-20-07, 06:35 PMReplies: 1
-
By 1100f in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 05-15-06, 05:54 PMReplies: 54


Bookmarks