Brain To Brain Communication Technology

Discussion in 'Intelligence & Machines' started by Rick, Feb 6, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rick Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,336
    Two-way Radio Communication with the Brain (Pgs. 89 - 96)
    From a Book called Physical control of mind.

    "....it is already possible to equip animals or human beings with minute instruments called "stimoceivers" for radio transmission and reception of electrical messages to and from the brain in completely unrestrained subjects. Microminiaturization of the instrument's electronic components permits control of all parameters of excitation for radio stimulation of three different points within the brain and also telemetric recording of three channels of intracerebral electrical activity.
    It is reasonable to speculate that in the near future the stimoceiver may provide the essential link from man to computer to man, with a reciprocal feedback between neurons and instruments which represents a new orientation for the medical control of neurophysiological functions. For example, it is conceivable that the localized abnormal electrical activity which announces the imminence of an epileptic attack could be picked up by implanted electrodes, telemetered to a distant instrument room, tape-recorded, and analyzed by a computer capable of recognizing abnormal electrical patterns. Identification of the specific electrical disturbance could trigger the emission of radio signals to activate the patient's stimoceiver and apply an electrical stimulation to a determined inhibitory area of the brain, thus blocking the onset of the convulsive episode.

    One of the limiting factors in these studies was the existence of wires leading from the brain to the stimoceiver outside of the scalp. The wires represented a possible portal of entry for infection and could be a hindrance to hair grooming in spite of their small size. It would obviously be far more desirable to employ minute instruments which could be implanted completely beneath the skin. For this purpose we have developed in our laboratory a small three-channel stimulator which can be placed subcutaneously and which has terminal leads to be implanted within the brain . The instrument is solid state, has no batteries, and can work indefinitely. Necessary electrical energy, remote control of parameters of stimulation, and choice of channels are provided by transdermal coupling, using a small coil which is activated by frequency-modulated radio signals.

    The technology for nonsensory communication between brains and computers through the intact skin is already at our fingertips, and its consequences are difficult to predict. In the past the progress of civilization has tremendously magnified the power of our senses, muscles, and skills. Now we are adding a new dimension: the direct interface between brains and machines. Although true, this statement is perhaps too spectacular and it requires cautious clarification. Our present knowledge regarding the coding of information, mechanisms of perception, and neuronal bases of behavior is so elemental that it is highly improbable that electrical correlates of thoughts or emotions could be picked up, transmitted, and electrically applied to the suitable structure of a different subject in order to be recognized and to trigger related thoughts or emotions. It is, however, already possible to induce a large variety of responses, from motor effects to emotional reactions and intellectual manifestations, by direct electrical stimulation of the brain. Also, several investigators have learned to identify patterns of electrical activity (which a computer could also recognize) localized in specific areas of the brain and related to determined phenomena such as perception of smells or visual perception of edges and movements. We are advancing rapidly in the pattern recognition of electrical correlates of behavior and in the methodology for two-way radio communication between brain and computers.

    and thus with the help of this may be in future we"ll evolve with the need of stimo,and thus leave our other communication aids.


    bye!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    Just like the infolink in Deus-Ex

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    I heard of this technology some years ago, but then it was in its alpha stage. WOW, now I will be able to receive help during hystory tests

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    But one thingie - if we make a link between our brain and a computer, at some time there will be made virii for brain (its inreversable). Then you will need to upload an antivirii software in your brain, and of course don't forget firewall and stealth soft!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    /SERIOUS-but its still funny/
    /Avatar/
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2002
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Rick Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,336
    For that we"ll have to pre-programme our neural nets,so that it discards if any virii is received...

    i cant think of anything else right now...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    bye!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Very interesting. just a thought...

    One can communicate between computer to computer through the PCI bus with its many connections or through a 3 wire fire-wire bus with great speed. Now, if we can find a small interface to the brain, then our problem is solved. Then we can build interface and translator devices. If telepathic communication can work, that will be the best I/O port.
     
  8. Rick Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,336
    Interesting thought KM...
    And to add:
    ==============================================
    Our bodies after say a thousand years will evolve with the need of such an interface and thus will discard various other slow,dumb means of communications...

    bye!
     
  9. ismu ::phenomenon::. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    468
    failed patent

    Adapted from
    http://www.atlantisrising.com/issue4/ar4topten.html


    ELECTRONIC TELEPATHY DEVICE

    When Patrick Flanagan was a teenager in the early 1960s, Life magazine listed him as one of the top scientists in the world. Among his inventions was the Neurophone, an electronic instrument that can program suggestions into a person directly through skin contact. He made the first Neurophone at age fourteen, out of kitchen junk, his electrodes were scouring pads made of fine copper wire and insulated with plastic bags. He then wired the electrodes to a special transformer attached to a hi-fi amplifier. Holding the pads on his temples, he could hear, inside his head, music from the amplifier. Later models automatically adjusted the signal to resonate with the human subject's skin as part of a complex circuit. Patent officials said it was impossible for a sound to be heard clearly without vibrating bones or going through a crucial nerve of the ear, and refused for 12 years to patent it. The file was re-opened when a nerve-deaf employee at the patent office did hear with a Neurophone.

    At one time Flanagan researched man/dolphin language, on contracts with the U.S. Navy. This led to a 3-D holographic sound system that could place sounds in any location in space. He then perfected a Neurophone model which could be used for subliminal learning that would go into the brain's long-term memory banks. But after he sent in a patent application on a digital Neurophone, the Defense Intelligence Agency slapped on a Secrecy Order and he was unable to work on the device or talk to anyone about it for five years. This was discouraging, since the first patent took twelve years to get.

    Having helped certain deaf people to hear, Flanagan's next miracle could be to help the blind to see. All we have to do is stimulate the skin with the right signals.
     
  10. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    I designed a similar device several years ago. It was an accident and byproduct of my research into digital recording of sound with spatial information. When used on an one-ear deaf person (due to menengitis) she was able to locate sound (spatial). I have an affidavit to that effect. We could not get the funding to develop the product for the deaf. The cost to do a single custom prototype chip is $250,000. When I have the money, it will be designed and marketed.

    From that research, I learned many things on sound research that USNavy did in 1940s and 1950s and that I was on the right track. I think a lot of information can be fed directly to the brain bypassing the audio sensor. One of these days....

    I have not done any research in visual signals, but since it worked for audio, visual could be accomplished too.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page