03-15-06, 02:15 AM #1
Americas Iranian ruse collapsesRussia, China Refuse to Support Iran Measure
The United States, France and Britain failed on Monday to get support from China and Russia on a proposed statement pressuring Iran to suspend its nuclear enrichment efforts, diplomats said, and they considered putting a resolution to a vote anyway within the 15-member U.N. Security Council, The Washington Post reports.
It's just a question of time.
03-15-06, 12:51 PM #2
It would be provoked, but we largely provoked it. It's mainly a distraction from Bush's unpopularity, and would be a huge mistake. They were heading to a free democracy, but slowly, until we declared them part of an axis of evil.
03-15-06, 11:08 PM #3
actually this time i dont think the brits would surport them. Would love to see bush out on his own this time
03-16-06, 01:31 AM #4Originally Posted by spidergoatUS derails efforts for democracy in Iran
Prominent activists inside Iran say President Bush's plan to spend tens of millions of dollars to promote democracy here is the kind of help they don't need, warning that mere announcement of the U.S. program endangers human rights advocates by tainting them as American agents, the WASHINGTON POST reports on Tuesday page ones
Originally Posted by Asguard
This was from 3 hours ago .
Report Backs Iraq Strike and Cites Iran Peril
WASHINGTON, March 15 — An updated version of the Bush administration's national security strategy, the first in more than three years, gives no ground on the decision to order a pre-emptive attack on Iraq in 2003, and identifies Iran as the country likely to present the single greatest future challenge to the United States.
03-16-06, 02:11 AM #5
Originally Posted by Brian Foley
03-16-06, 02:23 AM #6Originally Posted by TW Scott
Yes this man defied the west and brought in Western democracy , a freedom which empowered the Iranian people to take control of their oil wealth . Then America overthrew him and installed the anti-democratic Shah of Iran .
03-16-06, 03:06 AM #7
Actually, I for one do not believe propaganda. Especially such poorly constructed lies as yours. If your guy was so good why didn't the people just overthrow the Shah? Hmmmm. You can try the usual lines but you and I both know they are just lines. Mohammed Mossadegh was no better than the current Shah and in some ways was worse. Of course id the Iranian people do not tell their leaders to stand down soon, this crisis the Shah is cuasing will make any type of discussion about Iran pointless. Unless it falls under what to do with glowing land.
03-16-06, 10:53 AM #8
If your guy was so good why didn't the people just overthrow the Shah? Hmmmm.
Err they did.
Mohammed Mossadegh was no better than the current Shah
What year is this?
03-16-06, 11:36 AM #9
Last edited by Alejandro; 03-16-06 at 11:52 AM.
03-16-06, 03:54 PM #10Originally Posted by TW Scott
Originally Posted by TW Scott
Originally Posted by El Mariachi
04-02-06, 06:11 AM #11
TW Scot Brian Foley is right about DR Mosadegs government in the 50s you dont need to belive his word for it just go to the CIA site and look for operation AJAX and you can see for yourself.
But you need to actually care about the truth first...