Closed Thread

Thread: Why are women inferior?

  1. #281
    I want to contribute more to this thread.

    I'm not really sure yet; maybe something to perpetuate this cat fight. I'd really just like to coax Xev into a 1v1 on Lost Temple.

    It's funny that Xev knocks Nietczhe. He and that Reznor fellow seemed to really get her wet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Xev
    Not nihilism, per se. Nihlism is simply the concept that truth does not really exist. NIN goes WAAAAY deeper than that.

    But love does suck. The fact is, Trent explores a facet of love that most people either do not feel or miss.

    It is not simply "love sucks" in a whiney, CW way..."love sucks because she left" it is "love is painfull all the time, even if they do not".

    And it is. Nothing involving such an exchange of emotions can be anything BUT painfull.

    Love is painfull by its very nature, and Trent explores this fact very well.
    My gosh, that Nine Inch Nails thread is absolutely precious. Maybe we could start calling you Mistress Dark Raven, or something equally steeped in pain and... black. So much pain Xev, oh man.

  2. #282
    Putting my conspiracy theorist hat on for a second, I'm starting to believe that Xev is actually a man - and strangely enough, she sparked the idea in my head for suspecting that I was a woman. The concept of masquerading as the opposite gender is so alien that it raised a red flag; why talk about it at all...unless it's something in your own life!!?!??

    That, plus I've been on the web since '97, I've had a lot of time to analyse male vs female writing styles; when I thought to analyse it from this perspective, I found quite a few tell-tale signs of 'male' writing. I've read dozens of high-IQ women (and hundreds of their male counterparts), many of whom I was able to lure into aggressive or defensive postures; 'she' doesn't conform to any of them. The more I read Xev, the more 'she' seems like a devious man TRYING to write like a devious woman.

    I could be wrong, but then, who actually KNOWS? Have any of us actually met her?


    Jaybee.

  3. #283
    Dude, she's just masculine. Look at that handwriting in her "Fuck you Sciforums" note. Totally not chick scrawl.

  4. #284
    Quote Originally Posted by Roman
    Dude, she's just masculine. Look at that handwriting in her "Fuck you Sciforums" note. Totally not chick scrawl.
    Was there a little heart instead of a dot above the i?

  5. #285
    Quote Originally Posted by Roman
    Dude, she's just masculine. Look at that handwriting in her "Fuck you Sciforums" note. Totally not chick scrawl.
    IF Xev's a she, then yes she's a masculine woman.

    But how do we know the girl in the photo is the person posting as Xev?


    Jaybee.

  6. #286
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaybee
    But how do we know the girl in the photo is the person posting as Xev?
    Occam's Razor?

  7. #287
    Quote Originally Posted by Roman
    Occam's Razor?
    Which is about assumptions, not facts. We don't know if Xev = Girl In Photo, or even that Xev = Female.

    On an aside, this has turned into something of a surreal forum...

    Jaybee.

  8. #288
    Well if we don't know, oughtn't we ah, assume? And assuming that Xev is a girl with hair on her knuckles seems simpler than an elaborate conspiracy that has gone on for years.

    Maybe "she's" a post-op trannie?

  9. #289
    Quote Originally Posted by Roman
    Well if we don't know, oughtn't we ah, assume? And assuming that Xev is a girl with hair on her knuckles seems simpler than an elaborate conspiracy that has gone on for years.

    Maybe "she's" a post-op trannie?
    Maybe. Cut it any way you like, s/he DEFINITELY has serious issues, at least that much is staring us all in the face.


    Jaybee.

  10. #290
    that's not very nice

  11. #291
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaybee
    Cut it any way you like, s/he DEFINITELY has serious issues, at least that much is staring us all in the face.
    You know, I get the feeling she's actually sort of boring. Problems would make her more interesting. She sure is getting a lot of attention, isn't she?

  12. #292

  13. #293
    is going on in this...

  14. #294
    ..incredibly wierd and abstract thread, anyhow, let the bitch fight commence...!


  15. #295
    Registered Senior Member devils_reject's Avatar
    Posts
    659
    I do know women are a hell of a waste of time sometimes...and i have being arguing with one of them lately...its impossible guys!

  16. #296
    lol.

  17. #297
    How much is there to know? FallingSkyward's Avatar
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaybee from his cast
    Calm down dear, no need to get your panties in a twist, it's only a website. But yes, I am pompous, and I'm a new-school chauvinist.

    Can you PROVE that women do NOT learn more slowly than men in the workplace? A peer-reviewed authority? I would very much like to see what proof, if any, you can provide to back your claim.


    Jaybee.
    Can you PROVE that women do learn more slowly?

  18. #298
    women can learn much faster then men but women cannot remember much...whereas men learn slowly but can hold much more information then women can

  19. #299
    I'm calling BS.

    A concentrated man or woman can learn and retain amazing amounts of information. I've seen it firsthand. I've seen one REALLY dumb, but determined woman do it throughout HS. So imagine the capabilities of a smart one?

  20. #300
    How much is there to know? FallingSkyward's Avatar
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Xev

    Nothing is more indicative of how illogical, desperate and lazy these creatures are than the amount of effort they put into arguing their "holy" status as mothers. Seriously, what's a mother? A woman who performs 16 some years of menial labor and maybe instills a few socially accepted values into a child. What creativity that takes! What labor! What an exalted state!

    So after 16 years of pouring her needs, her insecurities, her servile acceptance of doctrine, in short her basic uselessness as a human being, into a child, she has won. She is "a mother" and gawsh darn it, a pinnacle of human achievement.

    Give me a fucking break. Motherhood is just an excuse for women to be what they basically are: parasitic whores.
    Motherhood requires the woman to give all of herself to the child; putting another human being completely before herself. This is quite the opposite of parasitic.

    She is the nurturer, instilling the child with the ability to become a well-adjusted individual. Woman are more in tune emotionally, and this is an incredibley important attribute. Men need this. The world would probably be in a constant state of war if it weren't for women.. We balance each other.


    It is amazing to me that you are a woman. Do you value yourself? Do you wish you were a man?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •