Bush won't tolerate nuclear Iran

[Brian Foley]

Its a pasttense, a battel lost; the winners also includes Pakistan and India. These are the countries that USA cant Invade.

The US has 100,000+ airforce , army & navy personnel stationed in Korea , coupled with those in Japan and its Japn/South Korean military allies . The US could start bombing N.K right now roll over N.K and turn it into a carpark in a week . So why is not America concentrating on N.K which IS the bigger threat .

[AmishRakeFight]

They're on the list right next to Iran. Remember that "Axis of Evil" hit list George Bush has? After this whole Iran ordeal, I'm sure George Bush will tell us that the CIA caught North Korea shipping nukes into America or something. Bye bye North Korea : /

[spuriousmonkey]

Do you really need a reason? NK clearly isn't inhabited by freedom loving christians who vote republican. No reason not to invade it.

[AmishRakeFight]

My sarcasm detector is confused...

[Anomalous]

The US has 100,000+ airforce , army & navy personnel stationed in Korea , coupled with those in Japan and its Japn/South Korean military allies . The US could start bombing N.K right now roll over N.K and turn it into a carpark in a week . So why is not America concentrating on N.K which IS the bigger threat .

Because NK can flatten that army in a 10 seconds.

[qwerty mob]

My sarcasm detector is confused...

/chuckle

Mine indicates spurious was being funny...

*taps meter housing*

[Brian Foley]

They're on the list right next to Iran. Remember that "Axis of Evil" hit list George Bush has? After this whole Iran ordeal, I'm sure George Bush will tell us that the CIA caught North Korea shipping nukes into America or something. Bye bye North Korea : /

Yes , but why is North Korea left alone ? Why isnt America demanding N.K disarm ? Why has the N.K action of throwing the IAEA out of N.K met with no US response ?

Do you really need a reason? NK clearly isn't inhabited by freedom loving christians who vote republican. No reason not to invade it.

Precisely, logically N.K would be the most urgent priority to deal with in fact it should of been invaded in 2003 instead of Iraq when N.K annouced it did actually have a A-Bomb .

Because NK can flatten that army in a 10 seconds.

Could you provide some proof to this assertion , I mean America is a military juggernaut and N.K is merely an economic basket case struggling to keep its head above water .

[Anomalous]

...
Could you provide some proof to this assertion , I mean America is a military juggernaut and N.K is merely an economic basket case struggling to keep its head above water .

Its a basket with a strangled mouth. 10 years down the line it will be powerless as Iraq.

[Brian Foley]

Its a basket with a strangled mouth. 10 years down the line it will be powerless as Iraq.

Yes but Iraq was still invaded and occupied to be made powerless Anomalous , N.K is the greater threat so it should receive the most urgency .

[Anomalous]

Yes but Iraq was still invaded and occupied to be made powerless Anomalous , N.K is the greater threat so it should receive the most urgency .

I hope that should the last mistake USA can ever make, where do U think WMD of Iraq have gone ? Are they in USA with the terrorist ?

[QuarkMoon]

Yes but Iraq was still invaded and occupied to be made powerless Anomalous , N.K is the greater threat so it should receive the most urgency .

The U.S. military could not win a war against North Korea. Vietnam anyone? Might vs. Manpower. North Korea has a lot of bodies to throw at the U.S., it wouldn't be worth it. Iraq was already collapsing, Sadam and his cronies were driving BMW's while his people were starving, the sanctions would have crushed Iraq in due time. An invasion was not necessary to take Iraq out.