-
01-18-06, 06:49 PM #1
hard to read...but....whoa.
this dude is on SOMETHING.
http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/...cle_2948.shtml
im usually a bit more forgiving of folks of this fellow's ilk....but damn he is OUT THERE!!
-
01-18-06, 07:22 PM #2Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 855
The article that was written by Jane waters? I think that you mean 'she' is out there
-
01-19-06, 12:14 AM #3
-
01-19-06, 12:36 AM #4Valued Senior Member
- Posts
- 15,484
i stopped reading when i read abductee
-
01-19-06, 02:09 AM #5Besides the fact that the website is www.unexplained.net, and the previous comments about the articles, these first seven words really did it for my BS/w00-w00 detector.I now know that the biggest secret
-
01-19-06, 09:16 AM #6
i actually took the time to read the whole thing.
it made me want to go to bed.
so i did.
-
01-19-06, 09:48 AM #7
"An extra terrestrial alien intelligence and technology far surpassing ours that, from the accounts of some abductees, tens of thousands of years old (ours is a mere 170 years old) seeks to lie covertly on our planet, going about its horrendous business unnoticed." (from the linked web page)
Surely, there is an 'is' missing from the sentence, and what 'ours' is 170 years old? Our Intelligence? Our Technology? Because they are the only aforementioned items, that 'ours' can refer to. This loon can't even string a sentence together.
Bullshit, therefore. WooWoo bullshit.
-
01-19-06, 02:12 PM #8
0h n0es, we're about to be pounced by happeh, duendy, giam and gustav, berating us for not believing everything in the article just because it's crazy, unsupported bullshit
-
01-19-06, 02:30 PM #9Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 855
'Firefly'?
Originally Posted by SkinWalker
-
01-22-06, 11:00 AM #10
i will usually side with "woo woos", but damn...that article tastes even worse the second time around.
i cant believe i tried to read it again.....


Bookmarks