-
09-30-05, 06:46 AM #1
Dishonest or Delusional?
As someone who doesn't actually believe that UFOs are alien visitors, due to lack of evidence, but still retains a child[-like/hood] interest in "gee-whizz" technology, I've been looking on the 'net for engineering data
and came across this - http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/adair.html.
According to this article some guy built a fusion-powered rocket at the age of 17 (in 1971) which had a black hole at its centre with the maths and engineering all done by this one David Adair.
I believe the correct engineering term for this (after 30+ years as an engineer) is "total bollocks".
But the question is: is the guy deliberately lying or does he believe his own bullshit, and why does the reporter take him at face value? The numbers quoted are outlandish, and everything he says is accepted as gospel.
Surely this sort of crap doesn't help anyone's case? Or are pro-UFO fans (in general) willing to take anything at all provided it supports their beliefs?
Pro-UFO posts invited.
-
09-30-05, 07:14 AM #2Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
done
Originally Posted by Oli
-
09-30-05, 07:16 AM #3
Hi Duendy. Ta. Ummm, maybe I should have written "pro-UFO comments and argument for/ against invited"
Left myself open and you took advantage. Kill me...
-
09-30-05, 10:22 AM #44th Level Human
- Posts
- 176
"They didn't want any gravity convection currents to show up in the alloy shaping process."
I laughed at this phrase for hours and hours. Gravity doesn't cause "currents" to happen, and a zero-G environment is zero-G, it doesn't matter where in space you are.
Also, to create a fusion engine, a "synthetic black hole" is not required, only a sufficiently strong magnetic field (Read: "Mag Bottle").
-
09-30-05, 10:46 AM #5Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
so i rthen would suggest this avenue of reaearch:
Originally Posted by Squeak22
did you see an email atached to that article? why not voice your concern to him, and ask him to foreward it on to the person involved and see how HE respond, and foreward it all to here to let us see an make up our own minds for ourselves....thias SHOULDbe the wonder of the internet!
how do you tink quantum physics woulda sounded to pre that AND to those who were the first to beginn finding out about all that? many were shocked
-
09-30-05, 02:56 PM #6Valued Senior Member
- Posts
- 8,253
That, for me, is perhaps the most intriguing questions in relation to reports on UFOs, the paranormal, conspiracy theories, etc. There is an almost total lack of self criticism (an essential part of good science) that lies or self deception seem the only explanation.
Originally Posted by Oli
Edit: Sorry, I can't believe it - I actually forgot to mention gross stupidity.
-
09-30-05, 03:13 PM #74th Level Human
- Posts
- 176
You also forgot zealotry.
-
09-30-05, 07:15 PM #8Mr AnonymousGuestHe wants to believe it, and a periodical by its nature dictates that, when the magazine goes to press, it has to have something in it.
Originally Posted by Oli
Basic rule of publishing. No blank spaces between the adds...
-
10-01-05, 04:25 AM #9Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
but you have lready deCIDED haven't you?.....whoneeds juries hey?....sheeeesh
-
10-01-05, 04:56 AM #10Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,258
Well, bad science is still bad science anytime you see it. It doesn't require empaneling an jury to see through this guy and his story.
Originally Posted by duendy
-
10-01-05, 07:00 AM #11Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
are you a scientist?
Originally Posted by Light
how do you know all of what he is saying is crap?
you see...look. ALL i am hearing is unsubtanitated claims being aimed at tis guy who purportedly is not umfamiliar wit science himself....ok?
so what am i to do, be satisfied wihthese off the cuff insults being flung this way and that regarding this guy's supposedly bad science?
like i said...does a ONEof you DARE....DARE to voice your reservations to the person whose email is attached to that articel...hopefully also forewarding your concerns to te very mn himself. rather than blindly attackingwhat he has to say?
well?
oterwise alo your attacks are meaningless...to me. i am here to learn
-
10-01-05, 07:02 AM #12
If such equipment existed and such a physicist was real to have tapped such potentials, then you can guess alot of University Lectures would occur. Afterall such science isn't just about patent applications, it's about making sure that the discovery made is tested via peers, peer review in this instance shouldn't be from some magazine/ezine that no one reads/purchases, it should be academic peers that can test the theory and recreate an experiment.
Once backed by said peers, such a person would probably get a Nobel prize, after of course releasing Documents (which of course are censored of delicate material) into the Public domain. Those documents themselves would have to be the ones submitted for such a prize (Not just the usual eccentric papers that are only hard to follow because physics doesn't work the way they want it to.)
Since such a publicised event hasn't occured and such lectures aren't so "ground breaking" that television channels swarm buildings, it would suggest beyond a doubt that the person in question is indeed lieing.
-
10-01-05, 07:06 AM #13Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
stryder...you are missing thepoint.
we are talking 'area 51'...you know like top SECRET?...obviously there isn't going o be openly acclaiomed peer reviewed glittering prizes and all tat. we are talking bout SUPPRESSED knowledge of advanced technology......cause IF such knowledge became pubic a lot of big players would lose their cake
-
10-01-05, 07:07 AM #14Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
haha...funniest typo yet...'became pubic' hahahe
-
10-01-05, 07:23 AM #15
Well if you check out a search for "EPA", "Military Installations", "Area" and "Toxic Waste", you might find some truths on the subject your looking for. (Not necessarily the ones you want. However what I read which was an old story for CNN, suggested a number of Area's/installations were closed down not to underfunding, but pressures from the EPA to clean up their toxic waste.)
-
10-01-05, 10:32 AM #16Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
oh, your trying to suggest area 51 is a place to dump toxic waste?
Originally Posted by Stryder
from whati have heard it is the Native Americans and black and ethnic people that have to live on and near THAT!....not the military for sure
no.....we are taliing about tepossibility of suppressed technology, and why noone here has the guts to actually speakmin real ime wit the people they criticize.....shit, surely this IS THE medium to do tis. no having to get paper, then ind a pen, then tink what to say, then write it, then place sheet in envelope and lick and seal it, then tae it dow to post box and ...dont foget the stamp....then wondering if they've got it yeat and will they be arsed to go through all that, and the time it takes bal bal....no. all yer gotta do i get them fingers moving, then go zap and its goin down the electronicfukin highway
tell you what then. tel me you'll what you want to ask. I@LL DO IT!
-
10-01-05, 11:46 AM #17Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,258
Yes, I am a scientist. I have been for a good number of years and also know a large number of them as well.
Originally Posted by duendy
I'm sorry to have to say this, deundy, but you wouldn't know real science if you saw it. Even if it reached out and bit you on the nose.
-
10-01-05, 11:58 AM #18F-in' *meow* baby!!!
- Posts
- 8,427
Hi Oli,
Originally Posted by Oli
There is evidence to suggest this person is deliberately lying AND believes his own bullshit (those are not mutually exclusive concepts). We don't know how the reporter personally took it... we just know there is evidence that the reporter performed an interview.
-
10-02-05, 05:05 AM #19Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 6,585
you pompus oaf. dont know me aliihgt? cause u dont. anddontput other people down cause they aren't part of your scientismic cult neither.
Originally Posted by Light
a true scientist who is first a human being wouldn't hav even said what you just said, so you've xposed yourself fpor what you really are....see above
AND you have typically--in your ad hominem reply--DIVERTED away from whati was asuggesting. to ask your 'scientfic' questions and concerns to te SCIENTISTS attached to te article being referred to...i DARE you! there i have challenged you..........what ya gonna do?
-
10-02-05, 09:57 AM #20F-in' *meow* baby!!!
- Posts
- 8,427
I think he knows with reasonable certainty that logical thinking or scientific knowledge is not a forte' of yours. Regarding the 'challenge' you are putting forth for him, why would he even consider accepting when the Australian publisher (Nexus) is clearly an entertainment provider. Look at some of the articles:
AN ALIEN DETOUR
ORGAN TRANSPLANTS & CELLULAR MEMORIES
THE HENOCH PROPHECIES
DEADLY DIABETES DECEPTION
OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE & SELF-RESEARCH
EINSTEIN: PLAGIARIST OF THE CENTURY
UFOs & THE DRAGON SNAKE
EVIDENCE FOR CREATION BY OUTSIDE INTERVENTION
MYCOPLASMA - The real cause of AIDS, CFS, CJD & MS?
AFRICAN AVATARS - Has Christ already returned?
This is the equivelant of the Weekly World News where Bat Boy reigns supreme.


Bookmarks