+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Backslash777 hack me if you can....

  1. #1

    Backslash777 hack me if you can....

    Go ahead attempt to crack my computer dude. You have no idea who you are dealing with. I'm going to make you cry.

  2. #2
    hack him if you caaaaaa aaan, hack me if you caaaaayaan. caaaaan, hack him if you ccaaaaan.

    Well it's been nice knowing ya mad scientist.

  3. #3

    To Mad Scientist

    Get over yourself.

  4. #4

    Re: To Mad Scientist

    Originally posted by Teri 2
    Get over yourself.
    still here. no hackky. u ppl are gullible.

  5. #5
    Unemployed, but Looking
    Posts
    358

    Re: Re: To Mad Scientist

    Originally posted by Mad Scientist
    still here. no hackky. u ppl are gullible.
    So apparently by your definition if we find something interesting and enjoyable, even though it may or may not be true, we are gullible?

    Did you know that gullible wasn't in the dictionary?

  6. #6

    Question SeekerOfTruth ...

    Re.'gullible':What dictionary are you using?

    http://www.nytimes.com/learning/stud.../20010830.html

  7. #7

    We are Backslash777....

    We are Backslash777. We have subjugated Mad Scientist's user account and have discovered that his name is John Holmeover
    832 Barker Ct
    State College Pa 16801
    email address: madscientist@hotmail.com

    We wil continue to hold Mad Scientist's account until said user bows to our will as we atack and subjugate his computer to stop him form notifying the authorities.

  8. #8

    We are Backslash777...

    We are confused by your lack of proof that Mad Scientist has been compromised. We cannot post under our original user ID as this would illuminate our position to the authorities who are now hunting us. We now have control of Mad Scientist's computer and are looking for places to hide ourselves. Please post ip addresses of willing hosts. We notice that God Mode, peanut and rodent have decided to not to post anymore in fear of authorities. We may not post to this board again in the future as further posts may compromise our location. We understand that an ellite unit of the military is currently tracking our TCP/IP headers and have to keep our location dynamic in order to defend ourselves. We have enjoyed our conversation here and will move into stealth mode now.

  9. #9
    Urban Anthropologist shaman1301's Avatar
    Posts
    77

    Get Real!

    Sorry Mad Scientist, your asinine imitation of Backslash777 won't fool anyone. Backslash would always make a second post of the same information under its own name.
    Check the peanut post!

  10. #10

    Hey guys,

    Can't we just stick with the one thread for Backslash?
    What does everyone think?

    Teri

  11. #11
    Unemployed, but Looking
    Posts
    358

    Re: SeekerOfTruth ...

    Originally posted by Chagur
    Re.'gullible':What dictionary are you using?

    http://www.nytimes.com/learning/stud.../20010830.html
    Chagur, Chagur...

    This is an old joke....

    First Person: "Did you know Gullible wasn't in the dictionary"

    Second Person: "No, Really?"

    First Person: "Yes, why don't you look it up?"

    Upon finding a dictionary, the second person realizes they have been had and finds the definition of gullible to typically be "easily deceived or tricked".....

  12. #12

    Yea right

    Yea right what ever uhh I dont think anyone could hack my box (from the net not using my passwords)hell, i cant even hack my box and other hackers I know can't either so i fear nothing no virus, no worm, no \777, or a Mad Scientest if you post my name and adress that wouldn't suprise me because that info is easily found on the net for anyone

  13. #13

    SeekerOfTruth ...

    Okay, I've been had

    The weird bit was that not being sure if there was a double 'l' in the word, I went to M-W ... and lo, no 'gullible', no gulible'! So, I went to Google and came up with the NY Times 'Word of the Day', the URL that I posted even though confused as to what was going on.

    As I said, weird.

  14. #14

    GULLIBLE DAMNIT!

    OK I come back to check on my troll and all you ppl have ben talking about is that you didn't know what gulible ment? Of course looking it up in the dictionary must have been embarrasing. No wonder Backslash777 likes this board. sigh.

  15. #15
    Unemployed, but Looking
    Posts
    358

    Re: GULLIBLE DAMNIT!

    Originally posted by Mad Scientist
    OK I come back to check on my troll and all you ppl have ben talking about is that you didn't know what gulible ment? Of course looking it up in the dictionary must have been embarrasing. No wonder Backslash777 likes this board. sigh.
    Now Mad Scientist,

    Your air of superiority is getting a little old, especially from someone who doesn't appear to be able to spell gullible or meant...or is that some colloqial style that is suppose to make you appear endearing

  16. #16
    Unemployed, but Looking
    Posts
    358

    Re: SeekerOfTruth ...

    Originally posted by Chagur
    Okay, I've been had

    The weird bit was that not being sure if there was a double 'l' in the word, I went to M-W ... and lo, no 'gullible', no gulible'! So, I went to Google and came up with the NY Times 'Word of the Day', the URL that I posted even though confused as to what was going on.

    As I said, weird.
    Chagur,

    Just wanted to add that I'm sorry I "caught" you with the joke. I wasn't really trying to fool anyone, I just thought that the joke was so well known that no one would fall for it. I guess I am really showing my age

    BTW, here is a link to a good online dictionary. I use it often, especially when reading some of the posts here at SciForums...too many people with advanced vocabularies for me

    http://work.ucsd.edu:5141/cgi-bin/http_webster

  17. #17

    Thumbs up SeekerOfTruth ...

    After almost sixty nine trips around the sun, I think it's me who is showing his age. No need to apologize, I need a bit of egg on my face every so often (keeps my self-image from becoming too inflated )

    And just so you know, the 'weird bit' was concocted as a 'pay back' ... Still haven't mellowed. Oh well. Thanks for the link, looks like it might be of use at times.
    Last edited by Chagur; 11-01-01 at 11:13 AM.

  18. #18

    Re: Re: GULLIBLE DAMNIT!

    Originally posted by SeekerOfTruth


    Now Mad Scientist,

    Your air of superiority is getting a little old, especially from someone who doesn't appear to be able to spell gullible or meant...or is that some colloqial style that is suppose to make you appear endearing
    Ahhh duh. check it retard:
    http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=gullible

    Now dont u feel stupid. Did you even look it up?

    This is so gay. You attack a supposed mis spelling as some sort of proof to the testiment of my illogic and then the word you pick on is in fact spelled right. hahahahhaa. Now first, I've never been a good speller and frankly I could care less when posting to a stupid web board, but for you to think that gullible is spelled wrong makes me think tht you are even dumber than i originally thought.

  19. #19

    Mad Scientist...

    So are you actually a 12 year old or is it testosterone poisoning, what's the deal with the immaturity?

  20. #20

    Re: Mad Scientist...

    Originally posted by Pzzaboy
    So are you actually a 12 year old or is it testosterone poisoning, what's the deal with the immaturity?
    Yes I'm a super intelligent 12 year old, just like BS777 is a super intelligent machine.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •