+ Reply to Thread
Page 98 of 98 FirstFirst ... 4874757677787980818283848586878889909192939495969798
Results 1,941 to 1,954 of 1954

Thread: Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

  1. #1941
    Arguing with a crank - useless AlexG's Avatar
    Posts
    3,023
    This the psychologist idiot, isn't it?

  2. #1942
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    505

    Lightbulb

    Aloha Everyone,

    There is a publication which indicates that Type 1a supernovae may have the same point of origin as de Sitter space. This might serve as a fulcrum for futher work in this important area of interest.

    > Einstein-de Sitter model re-examined for newly discovered Type Ia supernovae
    Vishwakarma, R. G.
    > Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 361, Issue 4, pp. 1382-1386.
    > The consistency of the Einstein-de Sitter model with the Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) recently observed by the Hubble Space Telescope is examined. The model shows a reasonable fit to the observations, if account is taken of the extinction of SN light by the intergalactic metallic dust ejected from the SN explosions. Although the fit to the new data is considerably worse than that of earlier data, it can still be regarded as acceptable. We should wait for more accurate observations at higher redshifts (as expected from forthcoming space missions such as SNAP and the James Webb Space Telescope) before ruling out a model that seems to explain all the other existing observations well (some even better than the favoured ΛCDM model), is consistent with beautiful theoretical ideas such as inflation and cold dark matter, and is not as speculative as the models of dark energy.
    Keywords: supernovae: general, cosmology: theory
    > DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09275.x

    Best Aloha and MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
    Last edited by Paul W. Dixon; 12-12-10 at 09:39 PM.

  3. #1943
    De Sitter space is a mathematical construct; there is no physical evidence that it exists, it's really just a way to model things. I'm not sure but I think it's because De Sitter space is globally hyperbolic.

    It's like saying a point of light has the same point of origin as Minkowski space which is globally 'flat', fer chrissakes.

  4. #1944
    Its the never ending threeeeaaaad, LaLAla lalala!

  5. #1945
    There's actually as much reason as not to believe we're already in a de Sitter universe. At the moment the dominant factor wrt the expansion of the universe is dark energy, and that causes accelerating expansion. Accelerating expansion is de Sitter space.

  6. #1946
    Moderator of B&E forum
    Posts
    18,306
    Quote Originally Posted by prometheus View Post
    There's actually as much reason as not to believe we're already in a de Sitter universe. At the moment the dominant factor wrt the expansion of the universe is dark energy, and that causes accelerating expansion. Accelerating expansion is de Sitter space.
    So "god" who made the big bang was really just some high energy physicists experimenting in their flat universe and they punched a hole in it to let de Sitter space (our universe) burst in.

    Now, I know what is outside our universe - their universe and those researchers (our God) drinking beer and celebrating the interesting collision results they made. - Hey that's as good as any of the prime cause theories, and more interesting than most, I think.
    Last edited by Billy T; 12-14-10 at 06:47 PM.

  7. #1947
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    505

    Lightbulb

    Aloha,
    Please recall, in this instance, that there may be visitors to those remaining from the selection process of de Sitter space Supernova generation. To infiltrate our visitors vessels with portable atomic weapons would be advisable. From an historical perpective, let us recall the influx of these early visitors to America and the subsequent havoc in the native resident populations. Better safe than sorry! An insidious attack may be effective where shielding may exist for an overt atomic attack.

    ALL BEST WISHES FOR THE NEW YEAR!!!

    Cordailly,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation

  8. #1948
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    137
    Seasons greetings from the frost-ridden, sub-zero climate of NW Europe.

    Hawaii must be great..

  9. #1949
    Has Paul now just gone into full blown paranoia mode, worrying about visitors, aka invaders, who might arrive after someone sets off a supernova? If we did set off a supernova (which is not going to happen, cosmic rays demonstrate that) there'd be nothing left of the planet. Paul seems to have gone from "It'll kill us all!!" to "It'll kill some of us but then we'll be invaded!!".

  10. #1950
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    505

    Lightbulb

    Aloha,

    In this connection, we may recall Professor Enrico Fermi's observation as to the presence of aliens in our ecosphere. The question we might ask is following the Nobel prize winner in this, where are they? They may have fallen to their own self-generated catastrophe. i.e., Supernova generation. Yet if they have managed to have survived, they may represent ancient forms that have come into the modern cosmos. They may be extremely deadly, intelligent and nothing to be trifled with.

    Let us be most careful in this.

    All Best Wishes for the New Year!!!

    Cordially,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova form Experimentation

  11. #1951
    I for one am extremely cautious about talking to aliens. It just isn't a good idea to get off-base with the green guys.

    I tried talking in Klingon once at a Star Trek convention--total disaster!

  12. #1952
    Moderator of B&E forum
    Posts
    18,306
    Quote Originally Posted by arfa brane View Post
    I for one am extremely cautious about talking to aliens. ...
    Yes Paul is correct - best to blow them up at first contact.

    Everyone knows they have superior technology and their robotic space-warping ship came to Earth to prevent further technological advances here. They have been doing this "halting of progress" to thousands of civilization that foolishly welcomed them with the idea of learning from them. Their simple, (to them) standard destruction procedure does destroy the robotic ship along with that developing planet's solar system, sun included. I.e. they punch a hole in local de Sitter space, which from great distance looks like a natural super nova event.

  13. #1953
    Honor, Courage, Commitment joepistole's Avatar
    Posts
    14,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy T View Post
    So "god" who made the big bang was really just some high energy physicists experimenting in their flat universe and they punched a hole in it to let de Sitter space (our universe) burst in.

    Now, I know what is outside our universe - their universe and those researchers (our God) drinking beer and celebrating the interesting collision results they made. - Hey that's as good as any of the prime cause theories, and more interesting than most, I think.
    I have to agree with you on that Billy T. Now what kind of beer are they drinking?

  14. #1954
    Moderator of B&E forum
    Posts
    18,306
    Quote Originally Posted by joepistole View Post
    ... Now what kind of beer are they drinking?
    BBB, I think. (Big Bang Bud)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •