07-23-04, 05:24 PM #661
paulsamuel are you still complaining about me, get over it, I won.
07-23-04, 05:28 PM #662
07-23-04, 06:07 PM #663
I argee if Dr.Paul is not going to argue and just spam for 34 pages on end then this thread should be closed, there no discussion with him as its like talking to a loud speaker.
07-23-04, 06:49 PM #664
Originally Posted by WellCookedFetus
07-23-04, 06:55 PM #665
Let the good Dr. have his thread. He's not hurting anybody. And hey, he just may save the earth someday. And if so, we can all say that "we were there, man. We were there at sciforums when the shit went down. It was beautiful, man. We saved the earth and shit. Nowadays all you young whippersnappers don't know shit about type I supernovae. But we were there."
07-23-04, 07:12 PM #666Originally Posted by paulsamuel
This is basically a 34 page advertisement of his beliefs, if that's all he want's just start a web page or a blog.
07-23-04, 07:12 PM #667
Originally Posted by invert_nexus
07-23-04, 07:14 PM #668
Originally Posted by buffys
07-23-04, 07:15 PM #669Originally Posted by invert_nexus
07-23-04, 07:30 PM #670
Originally Posted by buffys
07-23-04, 07:49 PM #671Originally Posted by paulsamuel
however he has never posted 10 in a row.
07-23-04, 10:25 PM #672
Not counting instances of 2 in a row:
- 6 in a row, from 08-26-01 to 10-11-01
- 3 in a row, from 02-10-02 to 02-20-02
- 4 in a row, from 05-03-02 to 05-23-02
- 5 in a row, from 06-06-02 to 06-26-02
- 3 in a row, from 01-07-03 to 01-14-03
- 4 in a row, from 10-27-03 to 11-16-03
- 3 in a row, from 04-12-04 to 04-18-04
- 5 in a row, from 04-25-04 to 05-04-04
- 6 in a row, from 05-09-04 to 05-28-04
- 4 in a row, from 06-21-04 to 07-03-04
2 instances of 6 in a row
2 instances of 5 in a row
3 instances of 4 in a row
3 instances of 3 in a row.
This thread has died repeatedly only to be resurrected by Mr-I'll-just-keep-posting-and-not-reply.
Close it already.
07-23-04, 11:25 PM #673
"6 in a row, from 08-26-01 to 10-11-01"
wow, six posts in a row over 6 weeks? if that isn't an example of artificial life support I don't know what is.
07-24-04, 07:30 AM #674
I would put a good bet that Paul W. Dixon here is a bot, as all he does is spam, has not replied in years.
07-24-04, 10:21 AM #675
Mr. Dixon will simply start another thread if this one is closed.
The thread should remain opened as a monument to the obtuse.
07-24-04, 10:50 AM #676
how do we know his bot has the ability to start a new thread? Its worth a try to see.
07-24-04, 11:29 AM #677
He's not a bot. He has actually responded slightly to a couple of questions. In his odd, sort of correspondence, god bless the children, sort of way. It really would be nice if he would do more than carry on this one-man quest. He obviously spends much time considering this subject. Why doesn't he share any of the practical knowledge he must have gleaned from his fear in other forums? Or even share knowledge of his own field in Human Science or whereever? Why does he stay so damn impersonal? That's what bugs me the most. The impersonalness make him seem wackier than the ages long quest. I suppose its a defense against people that might attack his views. If he's utterly impersonal, it's hard to debate a letter. A bot.
This thread is the liveliest it's been in quite some time, eh? Wonder what Paul thinks about it all? C'mon, Paul, speak up. Nows your chance to prove yourself human.
07-24-04, 02:39 PM #678Originally Posted by (Q)
It's hooked up to a respirator, lived an unnaturally long and shallow life and is begging to die, so someone put it out of it's misery and kill it already.
07-24-04, 03:08 PM #679
what if a humen started it but now its just spammed by a bot?
07-24-04, 03:21 PM #680
as far as I know bots can't edit posts and his posts often have edits. I'm pretty sure it's a person which makes his lack of interaction all the more odd.
I'm thinking of starting a thread and maintaining it like paul does this one, maybe if enough of these open a mod will actually do something.