This looks like it was filmed by phone. In the rain at that low quality, the plane's running lights might not show up.
Indeed they wouldn't - a 1.3 megapixel camera filming at distance through rain... it wouldn't have the sensitivity to pick it up. As you saw, it had enough issues just seeing the craft itself.
No..if it could see the unilluminated body of the craft it would definitely be able to pick up the lights...
Surely this plane had some lights on.??? http://david.dishmans.net/nyc/images06/2006-03-09-small-IMG0004.JPG
I'm not seeing any lights. Here's a diagram of all the lights on a plane: Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Mayb they was on (shoud have been)... but in overcast/foggy/clowdy conditions wit a cheep camera the lights dont show up so good like Kitt said.???
No..the lights are the first thing you'd see on a plane. There's no way you'd see the body of the plane but not the lights.
Heres some more examples of planes in fog whare the lights ant so visible.!!! [video=youtube;KoeM6opOq8E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoeM6opOq8E#t=49[/video]
It was filmed during the day, so lights may not be visible. I agree with your perception: a high-wing cargo plane. But as a commentator on the vid says, more likely an Antonov based on the location Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! .
I saw lights on most all those planes. And ofcourse you're looking at planes from underneath in a pea-soup thick fog. The craft in the video is at least two or three miles away with only cloud obscured portions but no fog between it and the camera. Another curious thing about it: it tilts at an angle as it goes back into the cloud. That suggests something beyond just a plane.
Saw the video before any comments and my immediate reaction is that it is an Antonov. But heck, chalk it down as "evidence" of the paranormal if you want, MR. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!