Why aren't magnet generators more mainstream?

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by garbonzo, Sep 14, 2014.

  1. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    I saw a video on magnetic rocks and the question came to me, "Why not make a free energy generator from magnets? I'm sure it's possible." I looked it up and sure enough you can do this, even with a few items around your house! This is amazing to me, but yet I've never heard of it before. If I went out on the street I doubt many others would know either.

    So I know there must be a reason why this isn't more mainstream, is a good generator that produces a good amount of electricity too expensive to make, or is it too bulky, or what? Why don't we see magnetic powered cars (I understand car manufacturers are using magnets to improve efficiency, but not 100% powered by) or homes or anything, really?

    I see a video on HowStuffWorks about a magnetic generator powering a lightbulb. Why can't we put this into everyone's homes inside the ceiling? Is it too loud perhaps?

    Thanks!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Because they don't work, any more than any other "free energy" device works.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    http://home.howstuffworks.com/home-...ion/green/how-to-build-magnetic-generator.htm

    I don't know what free energy is supposed to mean, is any form of renewable energy free energy? Then how could you say solar panels don't work? There has to be some definition decided on what free energy is before you claim they all don't work.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
  8. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    Ah, thanks, I missed that. I see in the video that they are working on it, but the technology isn't quite there yet. I believe it will be possible one day.
     
  9. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    Adding to what the two excellent posters above* said, note that renewable energy is naturally generated energy: the sun's radiant light/heat, the winds created through heating, the wave action created by such wind plus the energy due to the mass and velocity of the moon, the water which falls from the rain created through solar heating, the temperature difference in the ground when the sun heats the air, or the air cools below ground temperature.

    Renewable energy systems such as photovoltaic panels harness the energy. That energy is free of cost, once you have paid for the equipment. But it is not free in thermodynamic terms: the sun "lost" the amount of energy you "gained" at your solar panel. The law of conservation of energy is nature's way of telling you that there is no free energy (no net gain), that it's impossible. People who keep insisting on this are either incredibly stupid or just moronic pranksters.

    They also tend to be attacking science from a religious position.



    _____

    *BTW are you Farsight/RC/Reiku? Are you people all sock puppets of a single former banned user?
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Depends on what you mean.
    Like I said you'll ALWAYS lose energy in the process, so the only place a magnetic generator would be any good would be where there isn't already an electric power source, or you can "afford" to ignore the losses.
    A dynamo on a bicycle is okay, since you're already pedalling and it doesn't take much out of the effort.
    Or a hydro electric station where the water falls for "free" anyway.
     
  11. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    More energy out than you put in.
    Not at all. Renewable energy is energy that you can get more of, without relying on (for example) buried coal that will someday run out.
    Solar panels do work. They convert sunlight (solar energy) into electricity. They are about 15% efficient - which means you get LESS energy out than you put in.
    Not in the form of magnet motors. We may get much better at extracting energy from various reactions (like fusion) - and we may get better at sustaining those reactions - but we will never be able to generate energy from nothing.
     
  12. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    Why can't you get energy from the magnetic field? Why does the video say they hope to remove the battery that powers that device in the future? It's not like it's a quack site. Where does the energy come from for evaporation? Just trying to understand.
     
  13. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    You can get energy from a changing magnetic field. (That's how generators work.) But you cannot get energy from a static magnetic field.
    "Magnet motors" have a long history. A lot of people really think they work. They got patents and everything. But in the hundreds of years that they have been proposed, not one has ever worked - and, with the discovery of the laws of thermodynamics, we now understand why.
     
  14. TBodillia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    159
  15. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    Can you explain further? I'm a noob.

    When were the laws of thermodynamics discovered and when was this video posted? (I assume the video was posted after.) Are you saying they just don't know about these laws? (I find that hard to believe) Or that these are just amateurs with no qualifications?

    EDIT: Also, where does the energy come from for evaporation again?
     
  16. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    wrong.
    the field is constant.
    it's the conductors that move.
    relative motion bill.
     
  17. TBodillia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    159
    The link you posted, placing a magnet on the nail does absolutely nothing. The magnet has to move, or the conductor has to move, to generate electricity.

    Laws of Thermodynamics come from the 1800s. The video is from, well, conmen. They tell you straight up the 2 cones are spinning because of a battery operated motor BUT one day the hope to eliminate the battery operated motor. That will never happen. It can never happen.

    Evaporation is solar power. Hydroelectricity is solar power (rain cycle is powered by the Sun). Wind power is solar power (wind is caused by the Sun heating the Earth's surface unevenly since it isn't perfectly flat). These are "Free to Me" energy. As long as I have the money to buy the right "collector" the energy is provided free to me.

    Magnetism is a force, not an energy. Gravity is a force, not an energy. Gravity makes water flow downhill which gives water the energy to spin turbines to produce electricity.

    Go look at the link in post 11 for perpetual motion machines and why the don't work.
     
  18. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    '

    Whether the conductor moves through the field or the field moves through the conductor, the principle is the same. That is, it serves only to convert shaft energy to electric energy. The OP proposed "free energy" which implies no energy is added on the shaft, but rather, it's derived by coupling directly to the static field, which of course is not compatible with the physics. This is why bill said "changing magnetic field". There has to be a changing field at the conductor or no current is produced. (BTW bill is an electrical engineer in the power industry so he's an expert on this topic.)
     
  19. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    Yes. All of us who have some background in electromagnetics are in agreement. The other way for garbanzo to think of this is that drawing energy from a static field would violate conservation of energy. And yes, this is a common point of confusion among lay people, that force and energy are the same. Obviously they are not. (The field is the "acceleration" component of the force, whereas we need Joules, not m/s[sup]2[/sup]*. Or: we need that force moved across a distance, which is the same thing as saying the shaft must be turned by an external source.)

    *the actual units of the mag. field are (Newton x second)/(Coulomb x meter).
     
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    If a conductor moves through a magnetic field, current is induced. A force is also induced which opposes the motion. Thus, using a magnetic field, you can convert mechanical energy to electrical energy. But it doesn't come "for free" - it comes from the mechanical energy.
    Most likely they have been seduced by the cleverness of their own idea, and they think they have found an "exception" to the laws of thermodynamics.
    Probably a little of both.
    Evaporation comes from heat energy. Is that what you meant?
     
  21. garbonzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    790
    Thanks, I learned a lot. And laughed at "probably a little of both".
     
  22. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    wrong.
    the units of a magnetic field is the gauss (spelling?)
     
  23. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    i don't care what he is.
    what he said about a changing field in a generator is simply wrong.
    it's the conductors that move, NOT the field.
     

Share This Page