Why don't We Perceive TIME?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Asexperia, Aug 23, 2012.

  1. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    WHY DON'T WE PERCEIVE TIME?

    Because all events pass simultaneously.

    Two dimensions space-time (distance and time)

    We have two people: the observer (OBS) and the experimental subject (ES)​​.
    In the following graph ES is at 3 meters from the OBS. According to Relativity ES describes a straight line path.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    But It's that the OBS also "describes a straight line path", his time goes by at the same manner that the ES's.

    We have to conclude that the ES's trajectory, according to the graph, is a mathematical illusion.

    Let's consider this another graph:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The ES gets away from the OBS at a speed of 1 m/s. The ES's path in the graph is a straight line inclined.

    Here the OBS perceives the ES's movement as a separation, but in both cases time passes equal.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 23, 2012
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    What utter nonsense! :bugeye:
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    Are you sure!!!!! Why?

    Take your time.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    Because you've added exactly *nothing* to human knowledge. "Take my time?" You've already done that - and it was a complete waste of my time!!
     
  8. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    And because of that is it a utter nonsense?

    I'm sorry, I didn't know the value of your time.
     
  9. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    What we perceive as time? (indirectly)

    We perceive the occurrence of cycles or intervals that are continually repeated. We observe and register the frequency of occurrence of certain cyclical phenomena. This makes time or duration a statistical parameter rather than physical.

    The duration is a parameter that arrange events: timers, time (clock) and date (calendar). The duration is also a cumulative data.
     
  10. el es Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    322
    The perception of Kantian Time is a philosophical matter.

    Einstein's clockwork Time amounts to agreed upon increments of duration that can be plastic, unlike Newton's absolute Time.
     
  11. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    Ditto. It is utter nonsense.
     
  12. Mazulu Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,090
    To understand time, you really need to understand the definition of one second.
     
  13. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    The nature of time is a subject that corresponds to several disciplines: Philosophy, Physics, Psychology and also Statistics.

    Non c'e problema. No problem.

    Correct, the artificial basic unit of time is the second. Bigger units are expressed by the frequency of occurrence of the second (statistically).
     
  14. tashja Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    715
    Maybe at the quantum level?

    '' Within the framework of the laws of physics as we understand them today, for times less than one Planck time apart, we can neither measure nor detect any change.'' Wiki
     
  15. scheherazade Northern Horse Whisperer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,798
    I would merely remark that despite having a very good understanding of the duration of 'one second' and portions thereof, after working several years on graveyards I feel qualified to comment that one's perception of 'time' would appear to be influenced to some degree by our own personal circadian rhythms, which are also measurable cycles.
     
  16. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,328
    Another slant is that as we [ observer POV ] are changing at the same rate the universe is, the passage of time is only avaialble as hindsight. One can not directly peceive the passing of a moment as one is moving with that moment all the time...
    In other words your body, which is mass is changing at the same rate as everything else...so how can you possibly perceive time when YOU ARE IN time with everything else.
     
  17. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    LEVELS OF THE COSMOLOGICAL DUALITY

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Random is chance, that doesn't follow the principle of causality. In B-R governs the uncertainty principle.

    In B-T the random becomes ordination and applies the principle of causality.

    In D-T the becoming is no longer relevant due to the vastness of the universe. Governed by the principle of light-year.

    The distance is the length of the line segment between two points in space.
     
  18. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,724
    And circadian rhythms are synchronized with the cycles of the earth. When we travel from one time zone to another we have to adapt our body to change.

    You're right. We perceive changes (becoming) and we intuit intervals or the extension of phenomena (time).
     

Share This Page