Physics paper: Entropy:A concept that is not a physical quantity Published in (SCI-E Journal) PHYSICS ESSAYS (Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012)) P172~175. Download this paper here: http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672&do=blog&id=592073 View attachment 5774 In the paper III. ∮dQ/T=0 is a wrong equation based on a wrong calculus deducing .................. " in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, according which only ∫T ∫V ∫P 1/TdQ = ∫T ∫V ∫P dF(T,V,P) is clearly meaningful. Then, what does ∫T1/TdQ = ∫T dF(T, V, P) mean? Obviously, it is only meaningful to the calculus of three variables rather than one variable. The P-V-T diagram also shows that it is obviously untenable split or replace any reversible cycles using a series of element reversible Carnot cycles. To any reversible processes, dQ/T (i.e. df(T, V, P)/T) is meaningless in itself ." .........................
Crackpot physics in the sub-par outlet "Physics Essays" http://physicsessays.org/doi/abs/10.4006/0836-1398-25.2.172 This is not the first time this author has self-promoted the same stupid paper here. http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?100561 (promoting version of paper on a March 2010 blog post http://blog.51xuewen.com/zhangsf/article_27631.htm ) http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?104654 http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?114517 (same paper)
Hi,rpenner, I hope you can read this paper, please don't act on impulse without due consideration,I believe you could undersatand what this paper demonstrates is right. In fact, at first, the reviewers of Physics Journal were the manner just as you to this paper, but, after reading carefully and thinking over, they change their tune. sincerely yours