+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 21 of 21

Thread: Dark Matter Question

  1. #21
    Registered Senior Member LaurieAG's Avatar
    Posts
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by siphra View Post
    I realize there is a reason out there, but can someone link me a good, detailed reason, or even better, explain it here?
    Some of the latest research on local dark matter is interesting.
    http://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press...or-dark-matter

    But the rebuttal paper is even more interesting. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4033

    An analysis of the kinematics of 412 stars at 1-4 kpc from the Galactic mid-plane by Moni Bidin et al. (2012) has claimed to derive a local density of dark matter that is an order of magnitude below standard expectations. We show that this result is incorrect and that it arises from the assumption that the mean azimuthal velocity of the stellar tracers is independent of Galactocentric radius at all heights.
    It seems that the main difference between the two results is that when you use a common galactic center of rotation you don't get DM but when you use a galactic axis of rotation you do.

Similar Threads

  1. By [TheDoctor] in forum Science & Society
    Last Post: 08-31-11, 07:54 AM
    Replies: 7
  2. By icarus2 in forum Pseudoscience Archive
    Last Post: 12-17-09, 12:04 AM
    Replies: 4
  3. By eternal sunshine in forum General Science & Technology
    Last Post: 12-15-05, 08:56 PM
    Replies: 38
  4. By wesmorris in forum Physics & Math
    Last Post: 06-06-04, 12:55 AM
    Replies: 0
  5. By zanket in forum Physics & Math
    Last Post: 03-08-03, 02:32 AM
    Replies: 5

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •