I am a UFO witness...since July 5th night

[Neverfly]

basically unidentified object under water... it stands for unidentified sea going object.. if i remember correctly

Unidentified Swimming Object?
Unidentified Sopping (wet) Object?
Unidentified Sloshing Object?
oh hell...
Unique Stupid Observation.

[youreyes]

oh hell...
Unique Stupid Observation.

Unique Stupid Comment.

[Neverfly]

Unique Stupid Comment.

Good one

But just a heads up- my above post wasn't directed at you personally. I hadn't realized the implication 'til I read your post here. Oops.

[youreyes]

Good one

But just a heads up- my above post wasn't directed at you personally. I hadn't realized the implication 'til I read your post here. Oops.

Ah allright no puns taken, forgiveness is abound in my heart.

[Engell79]

I think it's great u share this experience with all of us, and found it a very interesting read that's for sure.
What u saw could be the release of luminous gasses like the instances reported from Yellowstone national park.
Honestly what u saw could be 1000's of things!

I my self saw a light ball once which gave me the chill's!! To see in a dark Forrest alone at night. (got two fuzzy pictures of it with my old Ericsson. I was thinking space aliens and a lot of other crazy stuff I'm sad to admit now, how ever it turned out to be offshore searchlights which was reflected in the layer of air between the Warmer air rising from the Forrest and the cooler air higher up.

With out more data your UFO will properly remain just a UFO.

[youreyes]

I think it's great u share this experience with all of us, and found it a very interesting read that's for sure.
What u saw could be the release of luminous gasses like the instances reported from Yellowstone national park.
Honestly what u saw could be 1000's of things!

I my self saw a light ball once which gave me the chill's!! To see in a dark Forrest alone at night. (got two fuzzy pictures of it with my old Ericsson. I was thinking space aliens and a lot of other crazy stuff I'm sad to admit now, how ever it turned out to be offshore searchlights which was reflected in the layer of air between the Warmer air rising from the Forrest and the cooler air higher up.

With out more data your UFO will properly remain just a UFO.

Thing is my visual encounter with this UFO lasted about 10 minutes, enough for me to gather some sort of conclusions about it. I believe my experience with UFO, which was a first for me and currently the sole one, is not tied to the usual UFO encounters by people who mostly say they see a UFO for few seconds or it is very far away and hard to look at. It certainly was not a luminous gas, because it was moving in patterns and by the river flow and than against the river flow, again in a specific pattern, until it remained in one spot.

My current goal with this agenda, is to match my experience of an underwater UFO plasma light ball in a river experience with the experience of others that had something similar.

[Engell79]

Thing is my visual encounter with this UFO lasted about 10 minutes

My current goal with this agenda, is to match my experience of an underwater UFO plasma light ball in a river experience with the experience of others that had something similar.

I don't think even a physics professor would say he could determine if a light was "plasma" or what ever in 10 minutes.
Why make concluetions wen u have no evidence, stick to facts and keep your story credible.
Making concluetions like that only makes you seem as a hoaxes and unbelievable.

[seagypsy]

Thing is my visual encounter with this UFO lasted about 10 minutes, enough for me to gather some sort of conclusions about it. I believe my experience with UFO, which was a first for me and currently the sole one, is not tied to the usual UFO encounters by people who mostly say they see a UFO for few seconds or it is very far away and hard to look at. It certainly was not a luminous gas, because it was moving in patterns and by the river flow and than against the river flow, again in a specific pattern, until it remained in one spot.

My current goal with this agenda, is to match my experience of an underwater UFO plasma light ball in a river experience with the experience of others that had something similar.

It's amazing to me how often people believe that their particular UFO sighting was so different than anyone else's. But when you compare them, they are all so similar and all so easy to explain by some rational nonspace alien means.

[Neverfly]

I don't think even a physics professor would say he could determine if a light was "plasma" or what ever in 10 minutes.
Why make concluetions wen u have no evidence, stick to facts and keep your story credible.
Making concluetions like that only makes you seem as a hoaxes and unbelievable.

Yeah, if you read back, he rejected the lighted fishing lure, simply because he didn't believe it. But "plasma ball..." Now that's plausible!

[Engell79]

Yeah, if you read back, he rejected the lighted fishing lure, simply because he didn't believe it. But "plasma ball..." Now that's plausible!

Ya' dont ya know! U can by plasma lights at Walmart LOL!!!

Honestly I don't understand why ppl even use the term plasma light
As I understand it, most matter has to be super-heated to become plasma.
If he was looking at a plasma ball the water would likely be boiling.