Ram Jet and Global Warming - is the physics similar?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Robittybob1, Mar 12, 2012.

  1. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Ram Jet and Gobal Warming - is the physics similar?

    You might think for a moment that is a silly question but I want to explore the science of both and see if there is a common aspect for both use energy to make gas molecules go faster.

    How does the simplest ram jet work?
    How does infra red radiation (IR) heat or add kinetic energy to a gas molecule?
    Is there a similarity?
    Can this similarity be used to explain why the atmospheres on other planets are circling so fast?

    These are the questions I want this thread to answer. If by using logic and research we can come to a conclusion we will then get someone to experimentally check the result.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,002
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Must admit that was an article that looked more at the uses of the ram jet to power aircraft. But when we look at the very basics of the ram jet and see why it wont work when not moving forward I think you might get the picture.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    This has the making of a complete and utter train wreck.
     
  8. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    I was involved in a real life train wreck, so I know what you mean. I will do what is required to keep the wheels of science on track.

    Why won't a ram jet work if it is not moving forward?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The atmosphere of Jupiter is moving forward as well, and even faster than the center of the planet moves. That must mean whatever powers the atmosphere also drives the planet spin rate.
     
  9. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    This is typical Robittybobbity.
     
  10. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    typically obscure and weird but often right, is that what you mean.
    Argue the science please Alex.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Robbitty, you've never been right yet.
     
  12. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Because you have never argued the science but rather just pulled me down.

    Tell me what you know regarding Jupiter's atmosphere and why it spins so fast?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Jupiter's atmosphere is primarily hydrogen and helium, in the primordial ratio, and clouds of ammonia.

    Jupiter radiates more heat than it receives from the sun, and this heat, the residual heat from formation, is thought to drive the atmospheric movement via convection, just as the winds on earth are driven. Since the gravity is so much higher, and the atmosphere so much lighter (molecularly), and the interior radiated heat is so high, the winds are so violent.
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Putting forth a hypothesis based on a process, then asking how the process works.

    See a problem there?


    Since you confess to not understanding how a ramjet works, how are you managing to draw analogies?

    By all means you should. That would usually precede forming hypotheses...
     
  15. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    OK gravitational collapse causing a compression of the core - releases heat energy.
    So the photons of that will be multi-directional, but conservation of inertia would mean the core could spin faster as it collapses. If that happened or was the main driver the wind would be slower than the center not the other way around.
    I agree the stormy atmosphere would be a result, but that too should not cause a net atmospheric rotation.

    The surface of Jupiter is moving at more than 45,000 km/h. What happens to the incident solar radiation? Which molecules absorb the energy and which direction do they go? That is where the ram jet principle will be useful.
    Look at the ram jet - let's understand how the molecules in the ram jet speed up predominantly with a velocity to the rear (unidirectional).

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Earth is moving at more than twice Jupiter's orbital speed. What of it?
     
  17. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    I know what you mean Dave but for the benefit of all who read this forum I wanted to spell it out very simply so that we are all reading from the same page. I want you to imagine the simplest ram jet as a simple tube like a pipe 300mm in diameter and 2 meters long with a fan exterior to it driving air through it.

    And a source of heating placed midway in the draught going through it.

    Will there be the beginnings of the ram jet principle?

    Will there be more gases (volume and strength of wind) leaving the exhaust end than before the heating source was fired up?
     
  18. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Sorry we are talking of surface velocity at the equatorial regions. Like I think it is 1000 km/h for Earth.
    Spinning rotation not the oribital speed.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    What does the rotation of Jupiter as a whole have to do with ramjets? Ramjets are an enclosed space. Large volume of air compressed into a small volume. Jupiter is not an enclosed space.
     
  20. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    It was a quote we were using the other day. (I'll post it soon) It is not the extreme outer atmosphere but at a defined depth. I have feeling it is hard to talk about surfaces on Jupiter as the atmosphere it just gets gradually denser till it forms a liquid. There is no specific boundary from my understanding.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Well yes, ram jets for ease of manufacture are enclosed but what would happen if someone did try and build one that "reached to the sky" so to speak.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Scale it up, how big could it get? The global warming experiments are performed in tubes but then we relate the principles discovered to the whole atmosphere don't we?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Never mind. Retracted.

    Jupiter's circumference is 445,000km and its day is 10 hours. Thus, 44,500km/h.
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935

    Wrong. A ramjet works because it is enclosed. Atmospheres do not do this.

    Again, it would behoove you to understand the basic principles of a process before building hypotheses on it. Do you not see a problem with this?
     

Share This Page