+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 203

Thread: Journey to the Center of The Yellowstone Caldera

  1. #181
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton View Post
    If you knew what was happening you wouldn't be able to do anything about it anyway.
    The only ones that can do anything about it are the ones that will be affected. It's like Japan. They have lived there and fought the hazards of nature for thousands of years, but did they learn how to be smart about it all?

  2. #182
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    The only ones that can do anything about it are the ones that will be affected. It's like Japan. They have lived there and fought the hazards of nature for thousands of years, but did they learn how to be smart about it all?
    Oh, you think pollution? I thought you were talking about something bigger. yeah we can do something about pollution.

  3. #183
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton View Post
    Oh, you think pollution? I thought you were talking about something bigger. yeah we can do something about pollution.
    I was not saying pollution. The fact is I don't think stopping pollution dead in its tracks tomorrow will stop mother nature in hers.

  4. #184
    Geriatric friend of trolls
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    I think I extrapolated some core concepts in all that.. (pun intended)

    I really just don't have time to make any meaningful comment at this point.

    As for the chimps: Ahhh... the bravery of being out of range...
    Same here. I could talk a little straighter in a PM where trolls cannot go. If you are juggling solar flares with all that other stuff, I don't know if it matters, but my clue, even if true, isn't laying around anywhere else AFAIK. Cause and effect sure gets switched around.

  5. #185
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    Just a thought. CBS News stated that over 380 cities in the US either tied or broke the record temps. Here we were 30 deg f above normal, beating the 1990 record of 79 degreees f by 2 deg f.
    Hold on there. We went over this earlier in this thread or another one. Provide a frigging citation. There is no way you were 30 deg Farenheit above normal! We already demonstrated - and you conceded - that you were three or four degrees above normal. It seems even when you are corrected you still spew out the same nonsense. Incredible.

  6. #186
    Arguing with a crank - useless AlexG's Avatar
    Posts
    3,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite View Post
    Hold on there. We went over this earlier in this thread or another one. Provide a frigging citation.

    Ummm... average March temperature for southern New Hampshire is 45 degrees.

    http://www.currentresults.com/Weathe...ture-march.php

    It hit 70 on Tuesday.

  7. #187
    Is he talking averages, or a single daily temperature? I see what you mean. It's probably the latter. The trouble is he is so bloody vague and inconsistent one has to intrepret almost everything he posts.

  8. #188
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Dale View Post
    Same here. I could talk a little straighter in a PM where trolls cannot go. If you are juggling solar flares with all that other stuff, I don't know if it matters, but my clue, even if true, isn't laying around anywhere else AFAIK. Cause and effect sure gets switched around.
    Awwww... c'mon. What would a good thread be without a few trolls? They were all the rage in the 60's...

  9. #189
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryoseism

    Aside from the confusing stuff, this is pretty much what I've been discussing as a possibility around the caldera in the event of a short "ice age." This suggests it may have occurred in the 1600's and could happen again... maybe soon.

  10. #190
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    CHANCE OF MAGNETIC STORMS: NOAA forecasters estimate a ~30% chance of geomagnetic storms around the poles on April 9th. That's when a CME is expected to deliver a glancing blow to Earth's magnetic field. The cloud was propelled in our direction by a solar filament erupting on April 5th (movie). High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras. Aurora



    This is from Spaceweather.com



    That makes 5 out of 6, unless we look at it from a 10 day margin, in which case it would be 6 for 6 predictions correct.

  11. #191
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Now we have the drum roll: The filament erupts. The CME fizzles out. 4 quakes occur. 2 near Indonesia and 2 not so far from the antipodes in Michoacan, Mexico and the California Gulf. All exceeding M6.

    Just logging data and pointing out sequential events.

  12. #192
    Valued Senior Member origin's Avatar
    Posts
    3,229
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    Now we have the drum roll: The filament erupts. The CME fizzles out. 4 quakes occur. 2 near Indonesia and 2 not so far from the antipodes in Michoacan, Mexico and the California Gulf. All exceeding M6.

    Just logging data and pointing out sequential events.
    And once again proving that humans have an amazing ability to see patterns where none exist.

  13. #193
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by origin View Post
    And once again proving that humans have an amazing ability to see patterns where none exist.
    And once again proving that some humans are incapable of thinking imaginitively at all, or at best in less than 3 measurements

    ...which is why they fail at generating anything original. Monkey see. Monkey doo. Monkey throw doo.

  14. #194
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    Post #191 was, as stated, logging sequential events. Of course Spaceweather and SOHO's site are really lying. The last 2 days really didn't have those quakes.

    I am lying.

  15. #195
    Valued Senior Member origin's Avatar
    Posts
    3,229
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    I am lying.
    Your being too hard on yourself!

    You are simply seeing patterns in random noise and jumping to unfounded conclusions. It is something that is very common in human beings; that is the reason that the scientific method is so important when trying to determine cause and effect.

  16. #196
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    You are making assumptions about my assessment. Personally I don't believe you would know any scientific method unless it is your accepted version. The masses are asses and mainstream is a product of the masses, not of the courage to embrace the unusual.

    I am lying.

  17. #197
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    And today Mt. Etna thought seemed a good day to eruprt.

  18. #198
    Valued Senior Member origin's Avatar
    Posts
    3,229
    You have been asked over and over for any data to support you ideas and you have been unwilling (or unable) to do so. I put together a graph that relates sunspot activity to earthquake frequency.

    I don't see any correlation. I did not do a statistical analysis of the data to verify it but it seems pretty clear you hypothesis is DOA. I realize this won't stop you from repeating your nonsense, but maybe this will get you to actually do some research or data analysis. Saying stuff like Mt. Etna is erupting!!, ain't cutting it.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  19. #199
    Registered Senior Member HectorDecimal's Avatar
    Posts
    438
    I put the data there as it presents itself. You simply are too uneducated to make any correlations.

    What I find outstanding is your inability to comprehend simple written paragraphs without embellishing them to suit your mean spirited purposes. You want the data to prove your version of what I've been depicting, not what is meant.

    Johnny can't read. Is Johnny dyslexic?

  20. #200
    Valued Senior Member origin's Avatar
    Posts
    3,229
    Quote Originally Posted by HectorDecimal View Post
    I put the data there as it presents itself. You simply are too uneducated to make any correlations.
    No, I am too educated to fall for your pitiful, ignorant handwaving.

    What I find outstanding is your inability to comprehend simple written paragraphs without embellishing them to suit your mean spirited purposes. You want the data to prove your version of what I've been depicting, not what is meant.
    I supplied data - talk to the data and quit being a clown.

    Johnny can't read. Is Johnny dyslexic?
    What is your problem? Is this suppose to mean something?

    Why don't you really shock me and at least make some semi-intelligent comment on the data I supplied.

Similar Threads

  1. By Tiassa in forum Business & Economics
    Last Post: 08-03-11, 09:22 AM
    Replies: 6
  2. By Pandaemoni in forum Politics
    Last Post: 11-02-10, 10:37 PM
    Replies: 66
  3. By Scaramouche in forum Eastern Philosophy
    Last Post: 01-01-10, 02:34 PM
    Replies: 1
  4. By superstring01 in forum World Events
    Last Post: 06-04-09, 06:54 PM
    Replies: 6
  5. By kmguru in forum Intelligence & Machines
    Last Post: 02-01-08, 09:09 AM
    Replies: 1

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •