-
03-14-12, 07:57 PM #181
-
03-14-12, 08:22 PM #182Banned
- Posts
- 2,394
-
03-14-12, 09:26 PM #183
-
03-14-12, 11:42 PM #184Geriatric friend of trolls
- Posts
- 118
Same here. I could talk a little straighter in a PM where trolls cannot go. If you are juggling solar flares with all that other stuff, I don't know if it matters, but my clue, even if true, isn't laying around anywhere else AFAIK. Cause and effect sure gets switched around.
-
03-15-12, 06:27 AM #185Valued Senior Member
- Posts
- 8,253
Hold on there. We went over this earlier in this thread or another one. Provide a frigging citation. There is no way you were 30 deg Farenheit above normal! We already demonstrated - and you conceded - that you were three or four degrees above normal. It seems even when you are corrected you still spew out the same nonsense. Incredible.
-
03-15-12, 06:48 AM #186
Ummm... average March temperature for southern New Hampshire is 45 degrees.
http://www.currentresults.com/Weathe...ture-march.php
It hit 70 on Tuesday.
-
03-15-12, 07:16 AM #187Valued Senior Member
- Posts
- 8,253
Is he talking averages, or a single daily temperature? I see what you mean. It's probably the latter. The trouble is he is so bloody vague and inconsistent one has to intrepret almost everything he posts.
-
03-15-12, 07:42 AM #188
-
03-25-12, 11:54 AM #189
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryoseism
Aside from the confusing stuff, this is pretty much what I've been discussing as a possibility around the caldera in the event of a short "ice age." This suggests it may have occurred in the 1600's and could happen again... maybe soon.
-
04-10-12, 01:54 PM #190
CHANCE OF MAGNETIC STORMS: NOAA forecasters estimate a ~30% chance of geomagnetic storms around the poles on April 9th. That's when a CME is expected to deliver a glancing blow to Earth's magnetic field. The cloud was propelled in our direction by a solar filament erupting on April 5th (movie). High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras. Aurora
This is from Spaceweather.com
That makes 5 out of 6, unless we look at it from a 10 day margin, in which case it would be 6 for 6 predictions correct.
-
04-12-12, 08:36 AM #191
Now we have the drum roll: The filament erupts. The CME fizzles out. 4 quakes occur. 2 near Indonesia and 2 not so far from the antipodes in Michoacan, Mexico and the California Gulf. All exceeding M6.
Just logging data and pointing out sequential events.
-
04-12-12, 01:22 PM #192
-
04-12-12, 02:25 PM #193
-
04-12-12, 02:27 PM #194
Post #191 was, as stated, logging sequential events. Of course Spaceweather and SOHO's site are really lying. The last 2 days really didn't have those quakes.
I am lying.
-
04-12-12, 03:28 PM #195
Your being too hard on yourself!
You are simply seeing patterns in random noise and jumping to unfounded conclusions. It is something that is very common in human beings; that is the reason that the scientific method is so important when trying to determine cause and effect.
-
04-12-12, 03:53 PM #196
You are making assumptions about my assessment. Personally I don't believe you would know any scientific method unless it is your accepted version. The masses are asses and mainstream is a product of the masses, not of the courage to embrace the unusual.
I am lying.
-
04-13-12, 09:27 PM #197
-
04-15-12, 07:15 PM #198
You have been asked over and over for any data to support you ideas and you have been unwilling (or unable) to do so. I put together a graph that relates sunspot activity to earthquake frequency.
I don't see any correlation. I did not do a statistical analysis of the data to verify it but it seems pretty clear you hypothesis is DOA. I realize this won't stop you from repeating your nonsense, but maybe this will get you to actually do some research or data analysis. Saying stuff like Mt. Etna is erupting!!, ain't cutting it.
-
04-15-12, 07:27 PM #199
I put the data there as it presents itself. You simply are too uneducated to make any correlations.
What I find outstanding is your inability to comprehend simple written paragraphs without embellishing them to suit your mean spirited purposes. You want the data to prove your version of what I've been depicting, not what is meant.
Johnny can't read. Is Johnny dyslexic?
-
04-15-12, 07:43 PM #200
No, I am too educated to fall for your pitiful, ignorant handwaving.
I supplied data - talk to the data and quit being a clown.What I find outstanding is your inability to comprehend simple written paragraphs without embellishing them to suit your mean spirited purposes. You want the data to prove your version of what I've been depicting, not what is meant.
What is your problem? Is this suppose to mean something?Johnny can't read. Is Johnny dyslexic?
Why don't you really shock me and at least make some semi-intelligent comment on the data I supplied.
Similar Threads
-
By Tiassa in forum Business & EconomicsLast Post: 08-03-11, 09:22 AMReplies: 6
-
By Pandaemoni in forum PoliticsLast Post: 11-02-10, 10:37 PMReplies: 66
-
By Scaramouche in forum Eastern PhilosophyLast Post: 01-01-10, 02:34 PMReplies: 1
-
By superstring01 in forum World EventsLast Post: 06-04-09, 06:54 PMReplies: 6
-
By kmguru in forum Intelligence & MachinesLast Post: 02-01-08, 09:09 AMReplies: 1


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks