The Akashic-Quantum Record

[Reiku]

Determinism is not ruled out. Not even by Bells Inequality, in fact, it is violated in the presence of quantum mechanics.

So here comes a question, determinism must be a part of quantum mechanics, if not, state your reason?

[James R]

What has the opening post got to do with Akashic-Quantum record?

What is an Akashic-Quantum record?

And why is this thread in Eastern Philosophy?

[Reiku]

Really?

An akashic quantum record is by my own definition, a field which records every action and thus presents reactions to those actions. It is a deterministic world in fact, an aether (of sorts) where there is a field governing the action-reaction principle.

Fred Alan Wolf has written a paper on a tachyonic field which acts as an akashic record. And before you dismiss him as woo woo, you might find it interesting that one of AN's theories in his younger years was that there could be a tachyon field theory which ''records'' everything. At the time, I am sure he had dismissed it. Yet for me to highlight it is taken seriously by some theorists.

[AlphaNumeric]

And before you dismiss him as woo woo, you might find it interesting that one of AN's theories in his younger years was that there could be a tachyon field theory which ''records'' everything. At the time, I am sure he had dismissed it. Yet for me to highlight it is taken seriously by some theorists.

Firstly I didn't have a 'theory'. Secondly I didn't take it seriously. Thirdly I mentioned it on this forum to show that when you're ignorant of basic physics its easy to convince yourself you're doing viable stuff. Looking back after a decade of beyond high school level learning I can say I was utterly naive and completely unscientific. Fifthly it had nothing to do with 'recording everything'. Sixthly the fact a naive 16 year old made up some bullshit shouldn't be used as a justification for your claims and as somehow support for Wolf.

You're being downright dishonest and utterly unscientific. You aren't doing anything viable. Lame troll is lame.

[HectorDecimal]

Firstly I didn't have a 'theory'. Secondly I didn't take it seriously. Thirdly I mentioned it on this forum to show that when you're ignorant of basic physics its easy to convince yourself you're doing viable stuff. Looking back after a decade of beyond high school level learning I can say I was utterly naive and completely unscientific. Fifthly it had nothing to do with 'recording everything'. Sixthly the fact a naive 16 year old made up some bullshit shouldn't be used as a justification for your claims and as somehow support for Wolf.

You're being downright dishonest and utterly unscientific. You aren't doing anything viable. Lame troll is lame.

AlphaNumerica, are you my evil twin?

Perhaps that "Fifth" was an ironic item number. Kaluza-Klein theory may not speak of the 5th dimension as a record, but it certainly doesn't rule that out. Modern Chemistry textbooks no longer teach the Bohr "perfect circle" orbital concept. Logic (if,then,else) mofifies it through classic physics to show, similar to what R.Buckminster Fuller claimed, the orbits are lobular in their geometry. In fact the electron becomes indistinguishable from the proton as it nears the nucleus to slingshot itself around that central group.

If we enter quantum physics and relativity into the picture, the the electron would need to jump over a microsingularity to remain within that atom. Inside that electron's trajectory would be a sympathetic synchronicity between entry and exit at a particular depth within the light cone of that singularity.

Planck Time is based upon the speed of light. Because the human brain, inclusive of the eye, can only resolve less than 100 frames per second, there will be interstices, base around Planck Time, as the number of photons reaching that atom from the light source photoelectrically run that orbit, emerge and those not absorbed make a beeline to the observer's eye. Everything compacted deeper and deeper into that singularity's cone would record the journey of those photons.

In theory if we could create a device to tune into that singularity, we could read that information and extract all the information that atom has "seen." The FBI might like something as such to help solve cases. As for the balance issue, I'd suggest looking up "the Butterfly Effect."

[AlphaNumeric]

As for the balance issue, I'd suggest looking up "the Butterfly Effect."

I suggest you look up basic science because all of what you spouted is nonsense or incoherent or irrelevant.

[Guru]

What has the opening post got to do with Akashic-Quantum record?

What is an Akashic-Quantum record?

And why is this thread in Eastern Philosophy?

I am still trying to understand if the point raised by OP has anything to do with the discussion currently happening in this thread. I think OP just wanted to use an eastern term to go with a scientific term to make it look mystically scientific.

[Reiku]

I am still trying to understand if the point raised by OP has anything to do with the discussion currently happening in this thread. I think OP just wanted to use an eastern term to go with a scientific term to make it look mystically scientific.

Well no not quite. I have been studying the work of Fred Alan Wolf - I am not saying I support a ''quantum field which is akin to an akashic record'' - I did this as to discuss implications, not to be called a weirdo, thank you very much.

[Reiku]

Firstly I didn't have a 'theory'. Secondly I didn't take it seriously. Thirdly I mentioned it on this forum to show that when you're ignorant of basic physics its easy to convince yourself you're doing viable stuff. Looking back after a decade of beyond high school level learning I can say I was utterly naive and completely unscientific. Fifthly it had nothing to do with 'recording everything'. Sixthly the fact a naive 16 year old made up some bullshit shouldn't be used as a justification for your claims and as somehow support for Wolf.

You're being downright dishonest and utterly unscientific. You aren't doing anything viable. Lame troll is lame.

No first of all, apart from would you please start reading what I say? I NEVER said you took your idea seriously, in fact I SAID THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

Are you being deliberately obtuse? Secondly I found it ironic Fred Alan Wolf has somewhat created such a field theory and called it like an akashic record. What is wrong with this?

[Guru]

Well no not quite. I have been studying the work of Fred Alan Wolf - I am not saying I support a ''quantum field which is akin to an akashic record'' - I did this as to discuss implications, not to be called a weirdo, thank you very much.

Sorry dude, take my word back, but you would need to explain a lot to get a discussion started. I believe we are not as well read in connecting the quantum field to akashic records.

[Reiku]

Sorry dude, take my word back, but you would need to explain a lot to get a discussion started. I believe we are not as well read in connecting the quantum field to akashic records.

Sure. For some reason my adobe is not opening the PDF, however, you can follow the link here http://www.fredalanwolf.com/page2.htm and go to ''is the mind of God in quantum theory?''

[kmguru]

Akashic Records: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records

We are trying to start a new idea here connecting Akashic to Quantum? It is like having a large Quantum Computer (100,000 Qubits?) that is running a Virtual Universe that would have all the records?