+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Random thought

  1. #1
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    172

    Random thought

    Random thoughts
    Grandfather paradox:
    A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->...

    Until A decide to not kill grandfather->loop broken
    Period

    Therefore grandfather paradox has the shape of a circle with one portion moved on top of another portion

    Predestination paradox has the shape of either a sigma, an anticlockwise o or a letter d

    Ontological paradox has the simplest shape of the three: Anticlockwise o
    That means one version of the predestination is also an ontological paradox, as stated by wikipedia
    Last edited by Secret; 01-17-12 at 07:15 AM.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Common sense before Wheels slapped a name on it.

  4. #4
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    172
    Random thought 2:

    According to wikipedia
    Color charge = RGB
    Subtypes=normal&anti
    RGB=W antiRantiGantiB=W
    CantiC=W (where C=color)
    (Note the colors have nothing to do with the colors in optics)
    So basically you have some charges where complementary ones cancel and a certain combination of the triple of these cancel

    Therefore If there exist something more difficult than the strong interaction, then is should behave as follows (should it exist)

    Charges(||) = ABCDEFGH....%
    Subtypes 123456....n
    ||1||1=0
    ||1||2=0
    ||1||2||3=0
    ||1||2||3||4=0
    ...
    ||1||2...||n=0
    ABCDEFGH....%=0
    ACEG...%=0
    ADG...%=0
    ...
    A%=0

    So it means
    Across different complementaries/subtypes:
    complementary ones cancel
    a triple of these cancel
    a quadruple of these cancel
    a n-ple of these cancel
    Self cancel
    2.Within the same subtype
    (Repeat above)


    IF strong interaction is like this, I believe physicists and mathematicians will be all crazy

    (Above is a frustration on trying to laymenize the strong interaction so I can extrapolate it to its behaviour in negative mass for my scifi wiki)

    EDIT: Some Scribbles
    3 types of interaction
    1.Interact and change
    2.Interact but does not change
    3.Does not interact and does not change

    Now
    4. Does not interact but change???! (impossible)
    (action at a distance also count as interaction)

    EDIT: More scribbles
    *[[Strong interaction]] (The color force reverses, resulting in 21 possible duplet and 48 possible triplet attractive color combination. Another consequence is all stable minus [[hadrons]] must carry net color charge (since neutral or white color combinations is repulsive thus forbidden for composite minuparticles). There is also more possible minuhardrons as the colorful combinations (such as a pair of quarks) in addition to the neutral combinations are permited (which is not the case for ordinary mass). The number of [[gluons]] does not depend on the mass as they are massless, and their number varies from universe to universe. Since the minuhardrons (including minunucleons) possess a net color charge, the [[residual nuclear force]] is significantly stronger between negative mass than ordinary mass thus minuhydrogen does not exist naturally, Instead they fuse easily to form <sup>-2</sup>He which dominates those universes and stellar nuclear fusion of minus stars follow pathways significantly different from that of ordinary matter)

    EDIT: Take this , 2nd Law!
    Negative mass inversion generators: Place the negative mass prodcued from one universe to another with strong 2nd law of thermodynamics. The law ensures all negative mass being exposed to those universes be overcompensated by huge amount of positive energy, which usually manifest as the negative mass undergoing phenomenon similar to supernovas. The energy caused by the 2nd law is then tapped in the process
    (This is nonsense if negative mass does not exist)
    Last edited by Secret; 01-25-12 at 11:23 AM.

  5. #5
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by netherreal
    speed of light is measured to different be in different directions '(|of| |frames|)', and I can tell you speeds those.
    Quote Originally Posted by netherreal
    In reality there is one/'many' coordinate, not more/'less'. All objects/'space'/'atoms' and light/'dark' are relative/'absolute' to that coordinate/'polar'/'Cartesian' system.
    Quote Originally Posted by secret
    strong force can be interpret as attractions and repulsion between color charges
    (Above quotes show incorrect concepts and are encrypted and scrambled, it is only for my future reference)
    Therefore you lose the game, and is OUT.
    That means any future encounter with you, I will need to be extra careful to avoid becoming cranky
    And should I spot a fundamental mistake you denided, it means I can simply continue the investigation without you
    Last edited by Secret; 02-10-12 at 03:02 AM.

  6. #6
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    172
    Temp storage for analysis in the furture

    http://www.amazon.com/Everything-For...dp/0979186102/

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Rav View Post
    Thank you. Now we know why everyone hates Stephen Hawking. The spoilsport has to go and ruin time travel...

    But actually I agree with him. I hold with the view that the past cannot be changed. If you went back to kill your grandfather 'fate' would somehow prevent you. The past cannot be changed, even if (and I have no idea if it is or not) time travel is possible. I express it thus it my very own mathematical equation:

    p=p

    the past is the past
    Last edited by Epictetus; 05-28-12 at 09:26 PM.

  8. #8
    Valued Senior Member
    Posts
    3,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Secret View Post
    Random thoughts
    Grandfather paradox:
    A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->...

    Until A decide to not kill grandfather->loop broken
    Period

    Therefore grandfather paradox has the shape of a circle with one portion moved on top of another portion

    Predestination paradox has the shape of either a sigma, an anticlockwise o or a letter d

    Ontological paradox has the simplest shape of the three: Anticlockwise o
    That means one version of the predestination is also an ontological paradox, as stated by wikipedia
    If the time traveler travels to before his birth to kill his grandfather thats all that would happen. He can even return to his time. Time travel isn't possible.

  9. #9
    God is not inside the box.. NMSquirrel's Avatar
    Posts
    4,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Secret View Post
    Random thoughts
    Grandfather paradox:
    A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->A time travel->kill Grandfather->no A was made->grandfather not killed->A was made->...
    Do we need to send the bomb squad over to your house?
    sounds like your head almost exploded..lol..

    this assumes that an alternate reality would not be created at the instance one went back in time..

  10. #10
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    172
    lol this is actually the most direct way to show what happen in a grandfather paradox (with the given assumptions), Because of how the cause-effect cycles for every iteration of the loop, this illustrates why it is a paradox

    Time is a really subtle concept and there are still a lot of mysterious surrounding its properties, such as whether it is emergent or fundemental

    This thread is titled random thoughts thus I often deposit some of my sudden inspirations, ideas etc. i.e. basically anything that came on top of my mind, here and see whether I can stitch these fragments together in the future to get something that actually make sense

  11. #11
    Valued Senior Member Buddha12's Avatar
    Posts
    2,583
    Use whaling ships to gather up the oceans garbage. They open the front doors or rear doors and sweep in the garbage where workers separate stuff into bins which then are put onto awaiting barges that take the debris to predetermined sites to either recycle , burn or reuse it. This would use the whaling ships for better purposes other than killing whales and pay the boats crews accordingly by a fund that the entire world must contribute to.

  12. #12
    Registered Member Awoken's Avatar
    Posts
    65
    I feel like eating watermelon and having a glass of red wine, a nice merlot would be just perfect. It's getting late, so I should go to sleep soon, but I just drank some decafe coffee (not a lot of caffeine, but still some). Tomorrow, I don't wanna go to work. I really don't like my job anymore and will be glad to move on.

Similar Threads

  1. By Kailaurius in forum Science & Society
    Last Post: 07-09-12, 05:49 PM
    Replies: 6
  2. By Jarek Duda in forum Alternative Theories
    Last Post: 12-18-11, 03:20 PM
    Replies: 6
  3. By yesemina in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 10-03-08, 12:16 AM
    Replies: 4
  4. By Quantum Quack in forum General Philosophy
    Last Post: 11-04-07, 11:53 PM
    Replies: 48
  5. By lightgigantic in forum General Philosophy
    Last Post: 10-05-07, 07:34 PM
    Replies: 52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •