-
01-19-12, 09:47 AM #121Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 192
-
01-19-12, 09:58 AM #122
Allen Russell Photography
Alliance of Visual Artists (AVA)
American Association of Independent Music (A2IM)
American Photographic Artists
American Society of Media Photographers
American Society of Picture Professionals
Art Holeman Photography
Brian Stevenson Photography
Christopher Semmes Photography
Commercial Photographers International
Council of Fashion Designers of America
Country Music Association
Dan Sherwood Photography
Derek DiLuzio Photography
DeVaul Photography
Doriguzzi Photographic Artistry
Dolce & Gabbana USA, INC.
Don Grall Photography
Dunford Architectural Photography
Ed McDonald Photography
Englebert Photography
Eric Meola Studio Inc
Just through the EsLast edited by adoucette; 01-19-12 at 10:12 AM.
-
01-19-12, 09:59 AM #123Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 192
Which, if you'd read my post properly, you'd know wasn't the point.
The argument was how paying for content could be encouraged. The answers are pragmatic measures that have the desired effect. If you want to retrodict ethical generalisations from that it's your affair.
Because it isn't possible. There is no technological solution. It is mathematically impossible to produce content that can be watched but cannot be copied. You don't have to take my word for it, I've only worked in the industry for nine years, and only studied the subject for four. You can find out for yourself, find out what world renowned experts say about it.
It simply cannot be done. It doesn't matter how much profit there is in convincing distributors and their lawyers, it is impossible. And I don't mean difficult, I mean contrary to the fundamental nature of the universe.
The only option you have is persuading people, either by making your product as good as the pirated one, or by threatening them with force.
-
01-19-12, 10:03 AM #124Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 192
So by "content creator", you include "ngos and lobbyist organisations which oversee the guidelines used by companies who employ people who are content creators".
I see. That makes more sense now.
If only I'd known all along that when you said "artists" you meant "lawyers and lobbyists".
So you'd better repeat your mafiaa propaganda louder, because that makes it more true. Or go back and reinterpret what you said to try and making look less idiotic in light of the facts.
Toss a coin maybe.
-
01-19-12, 10:06 AM #125
LOL, a little checking shows that DVD players are available (and have been for some time) in Australia that will play all regions.
http://www.shopbot.com.au/multi-regi...stralia/347211
-
01-19-12, 10:07 AM #126
-
01-19-12, 10:08 AM #127
-
01-19-12, 10:09 AM #128
-
01-19-12, 10:11 AM #129
BS, none of those were publishers (I took out ASCAP).
Associations of artists count.
And lots of them were single people.
And I only went through the Es
Clearly a LOT of people disagree with you.
And they are content creators.
No one is so blind as someone who will not see.
-
01-19-12, 10:15 AM #130
-
01-19-12, 10:18 AM #131
@ Arthur,
You've provided lists of companies which support SOPA, can you name any actual artists--as in musicians, filmmakers, engineers, et al?
I personally know a few thousand, mostly musicians but plenty of the other (and obviously, there's a lot of cross-over) and personally, I know maybe 3 or 4. And, like I said previously, they tend to vacillate on their positions.
And please, spare me a list that includes such, uh, "musicians" as "Dixie Chicks" and the like, whatever the fuck that is.
-
01-19-12, 10:19 AM #132
-
01-19-12, 10:22 AM #133
Actually its the distributors that most people have a problem with, they are the ones in breach of the trade practices act, they are the ones in breach of the US Australian Free trade agreement, they are the ones in breach of every other free trade agreement that Australia has.
-
01-19-12, 10:22 AM #134
Give it a rest
http://www.kogan.com.au/shop/kogan-b...full-hd-1080p/
-
01-19-12, 10:23 AM #135
-
01-19-12, 10:26 AM #136
-
01-19-12, 10:26 AM #137
What's wrong with companies?
Most content creators get paid by signing contracts with these companies.
So the company's motives and theirs coincide.
Why do associations of Artists not count?
If you will notice, in that list there are a lot of companies that represent the work of ONE artist, who in most cases would be the owner.
-
01-19-12, 10:28 AM #138
-
01-19-12, 10:29 AM #139
-
01-19-12, 10:30 AM #140
There are more
http://www.titanicimports.com/store/...-converter.htm
Do your own research, but the basis of your argument is full of holes.
Similar Threads
-
By Trooper in forum PoliticsLast Post: 01-17-12, 11:56 PMReplies: 12
-
By dbnp48 in forum Computer Science & CultureLast Post: 02-27-11, 08:25 AMReplies: 6
-
By Ziad S Homsi in forum World EventsLast Post: 06-23-10, 04:13 PMReplies: 1746
-
By James R in forum Ethics, Morality, & JusticeLast Post: 11-21-09, 07:29 PMReplies: 28
-
By madanthonywayne in forum Ethics, Morality, & JusticeLast Post: 03-03-09, 01:37 AMReplies: 19


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks