Universal Change rate at speed of light.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Quantum Quack, Nov 24, 2011.

  1. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,328
    Opinion:

    Albert Einsteins initial inspiration concerning the effects we call light was so utterly staggering in it's scope and depth when thinking about universal fundamentals.
    Most people including some of the greatest scientists humanity has ever had have great difficluty in comprehending such a significant contribution to the way science sees the universe.

    When AE realised that IF light existed as a spacial vaccum travelling entity as was the popular belief at the time 1900's [if at all] it existed smack bang in the middle between past and future at all moments of existance, he made an incredible leap in "our" or more precisely "his" understanding of time and motion. The difficulty as always is in the comunication of that "leap" and that is where human ego and failability comes to the fore.
    The light cones diagram as used to describe EM space time clearly indicates so many things, most of which has been over looked by most physicist due to the enormity of what they demonstrate.

    Clearly AE positioned the light particle wave as always being in the present moment [hsp] but always traveling at a rate of 'c'.
    This has immediate ramifications and seemingly some of the most important ramifications are overlooked as they impinges upon the integrity of "special relativity" in a most confusing manner. IMO.

    Ramifications:

    1]
    As light is constantly in the present moment then it is inertial to all things of substance which must also be moving at the same rate of 'c'.

    Why?:
    Because the present moment for the entire universe [including all mass and energy] is changing constantly at the speed of 'c'. which can lead to the possible understanding of the invariance of inertia and a better understanding of time dilation effects

    There fore light can not be said to have a velocity or speed that is "relative" to mass as it is travelling at the same rate as mass. [This is a major issue for special relativity IMO] So the interpretation of light speed data is possibly incorrect.

    2]
    Unaccelerating objects therefore are already traveling at 'c' by way of vibration [d/t] regardless of their relative velocity to other non-accellerating objects.

    There are many other ramifications but the above two will do for now I think....

    care to discuss?
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2011

Share This Page