The one thing that most theists I have ever met or read their texts have in common is a tendency to lack empathy for other humans. It's as if theists are completely unable - or unwilling - to even try to place themselves in the other person's situation. Instead, theists tend to treat other people as if they don't exist. It has to be either the theist's way - or the highway. Why is this?
i think it has to do with identification with absolute authority or 'god'. basically, some theists want absolute power themselves so identify with it or uphold those type of values. this is especially more prevalent with those attracted to monotheistic religions.
Then you're probably not mixing with the right theists. Many theists are very empathetic people. Many theists donate to the needy or actually volunteer to help out. There are theists who care deeply about other people. Some choose to devote their lives to other people. In fact, that's what a lot of priests, pastors and other church leaders do. If they're right, of course, then their way is the good way.
That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with empathy. It could be simply things they do to make themselves feel good and capitalizing on the needs of others. If. The fact is that we do not know whether their way is the right way - and they do not care about that. This is how they lack empathy.
i would say a lot of religionists are very enamored with the concept of a god or it's power. some religionists view god as an authority who cares for people and that is their motivation but from personal experience, the majority of them are more into the power aspect of what a god represents and they view being in the right 'club' to mean they have a right to some authority or to dictate what god thinks or says to others.
If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it's always possible that it might be a duck. Consider. Yes, and you'll agree that the same can be said of any atheist who does a good deed, too. What? A lot of theists care very much that non-believers should be led to the right view. They can have very real concerns for the welfare of your soul.
I find it strange that the most religious politicians in the US are the Republicans. They claim they follow Jesus, who said to give away your possessions to help the poor and to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, yet they don't like the notion of government welfare, a US version of a National Health Service or, in some cases (ie the most religious lot, the Tea Partyers) taxes at all. The charity of Jesus and his helping of the poor and ill and general down trodden are held up as virtues we should all emulate but when someone says "How about a national health service so we can help 40+ million people who can't get insurance?" suddenly it is "Down with taxes! Get your hands off my stuff!". Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand are all vastly more atheistic/secular (and held up as immoral and godless by some religious nuts) but we all have national health systems. I'm not saying all theists are like that but it seems the most vocal theists in US politics are massive hypocrites when it comes to helping others. Hardcore Republicans like to think of themselves as godly and as reclaiming America for Jesus but if Jesus came back they'd denounce him as a communist and a socialist without a second thought.
they identify with the warmongering, power and absolute authority of the old testament god but it won't be conveyed in those exact terms. there are numerous texts that show this god as claiming to be the best and boastful as well as condoning the heirarchy of the haves and have nots, these are called god's 'blessings' as he sees fit. jesus is as the lesser kid who is doling out charity or chump change to the unfortunates or the famous 'your life may be shitty here but you will be rewarded in heaven, so just lick your wounds'. there is so much about jesus in the new testament that is so contrary to the god of the old testament that it's very suspicious to even equate the two as being related. it's almost as if the powers that be knew this revolutionary was going to have a real impact with his wisdom so found a way to tie the two together in the bible as if jesus of the new testament approved of the old one. as for the topic, it can go either way. there are those who are attracted to the concept of god because of a power trip and those who view the concept of god for the opposite reason which is to appeal to social or societal conscience and responsiblity toward whole of humanity.
So, ask a Christian how they view their God...and if you get a real honest answer, you have a key to understanding that person... According to the wiki about prosperity theology: So, if you are poor and sick, you're just not a good Christian. So I guess you deserve what you get? And further, taxes contravene God's will, I mean, if God didn't want you to have the money, why, you would not have earned it? How dare the government tax what God wanted you to have to heal those godless sick people! (Yes, I know I'm not being nice, but I get medicine from a county program partly funded by the feds...and this may directly affect me.)
As an atheist, I find that I don't really care. But since you ask, perhaps it's because by the time a theist reaches a level where they feel they've got something to write down, they've well and truly got their heads locked up their derrière! I know plenty of theist who are very nice, empathetic people but are unlikely ever to write about it or take up public speaking.
the 1st post is one you made in response to squirrel in the "are all discussions of god speculative nonsense" thread yesterday, regarding his religious views. and now this thread today. would you care to explain why it is that you insist that other people act as an authority, guru, even divine, tell you exactly what to do in regards to religion or faith, and cuss them out when they won't, and then turn around in virtually the same breath and complain about the idea of theists doing that very same thing? you are such a blatant troll.
you don't want empathy, you want sympathy. you want a guru to tell you what to do. you want someone else (another human) to save you. YOU WANT SOMEONE TO BLAME. see signal, i am empathetic; that's how i know your game. your game...your insincere trolling...is obvious to anyone who has endeavored spiritual knowledge and experience themselves. thread after thread, day after day, year after year, theists who know better tell you repeatedly that this is something you have to do yourself. but you don't want that responsibility. you're not that sincere. i don't even think you desire knowledge of god at all. i think you're just some jaded troll who wants to stick it to people who do claim to know god. but just in case... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NZsCYOM4j0&ob=av2e JESUS SAVES. it's not a cult you join. it's not a doctrine you obey. it's not a lifestyle you adopt. it's not a recitation. it's not a ritual. it's not a fucking 12 step program. and it's no one's responsibility but yours. it's a personal endeavor. so if you're not willing to petition god in the name of christ, in sincerity and humility, ALL BY YOURSELF, then shut the fuck up. THAT. IS. EMPATHY. because i know what the fuck i'm talking about. i know how it works.
You've had very unpleasant experiences with 'theists', apparently. My own experience has been dramatically different. Some of the most humane and compassionate people that I've ever met have been theists. Others have been assholes. The same thing can be said for atheists. Empathy, compassion, or whatever we call it is more of a personal-psychological variable, I think. It doesn't seem to be all that strongly correlated to religious belief or with the lack of it.
See, this, Yazata? This is the kind of thing I am talking about when I am talking about theists lacking empathy.
By calling us "fucking idots", "trolls", "liars", "dishonest" and such? And this is even part of their doctrine?
oh i dare you to explain it, but i also know how evasive and dishonest you are, so i expect the status quo from you. prove me wrong.
you'll be a martyr in hell signal, and it will still be all your fault. how is it cruel to say that unless you do what it takes to know god, you won't know god? it's not cruel; it's the truth. the truth is, you don't want to know god, and so you don't. isn't that correct?
