+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Being the experience of what is happening as opposed to having it

  1. #1

    Being the experience of what is happening as opposed to having it

    This understanding on a deep level simply means that one is no longer having the sensations as an 'I' or alien identity inhabiting the flesh and blood body -that lost, lonely, frightened entity in need of consolidation and validation by others- instead one becomes the experiencing of the 5 senses and no more or no less. Where grandiosity is the more and shame being the less, with neutrality as the steady-state emotional experience.

  2. #2
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    This understanding on a deep level
    Understanding of what?

    that lost, lonely, frightened entity in need of consolidation and validation by others
    Consolidation? Consolation? And yet here you are telling us all about it...

    instead one becomes the experiencing of the 5 senses and no more or no less.
    Poor baby. The rest of us have more than five senses.

    Where grandiosity is the more and shame being the less, with neutrality as the steady-state emotional experience.
    Grandiosity is neutral?

  3. #3
    thou art wise oJjames R spidergoat's Avatar
    Posts
    44,602
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    This understanding on a deep level simply means that one is no longer having the sensations as an 'I' or alien identity inhabiting the flesh and blood body -that lost, lonely, frightened entity in need of consolidation and validation by others- instead one becomes the experiencing of the 5 senses and no more or no less. Where grandiosity is the more and shame being the less, with neutrality as the steady-state emotional experience.
    Yeah, that's pretty much it.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Understanding of what?
    The understanding that one mistakenly experiences oneself as a spirit through an accidental stint of evolution. Whereas, one is a flesh and blood body only. Thus one becomes more of the experiencing of what is happening as opposed to the having or possessing of it.

    Consolidation? Consolation? And yet here you are telling us all about it...
    Yes, because the internet is readily available to share enlightened words to a benighted humanity. I have no dependency on others that would prompt to undertake communication, I have no hope for civilization to advance, rather, as I am advanced then sharing this information with others is simply a pleasure.


    Poor baby. The rest of us have more than five senses.
    The last time I checked an anatomy book I saw 5 organs corresponding to 5 senses.


    Grandiosity is neutral?
    No. Grandiosity is believing/feeling oneself to be the "more", where shame is believing/feeling oneself to be the "less", and neutrality is the state of having nothing happen to provoke either believing/feeling oneself to be either. However, that does not mean one is no longer feeling as neutrality remains vigilant/defensive of the lows and hopeful of the highs.

  5. #5
    Be kind to yourself always. cosmictraveler's Avatar
    Posts
    29,594
    The last time I checked an anatomy book I saw 5 organs corresponding to 5 senses.
    There's more, I know of some people that have the bullshit sense, they really know how to use it well to deceive others and think themselves cunning.

  6. #6
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    The understanding that one mistakenly experiences oneself as a spirit through an accidental stint of evolution.
    Ah, a guess. Who thinks they're a"spirit"?

    Yes, because the internet is readily available to share enlightened words to a benighted humanity.



    The last time I checked an anatomy book I saw 5 organs corresponding to 5 senses.
    Check again:
    The traditional five senses are sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste, a classification attributed to Aristotle.[2] Humans are considered to have at least five additional senses that include: nociception (pain); equilibrioception (balance); proprioception and kinaesthesia (joint motion and acceleration); sense of time; thermoception (temperature differences); and possibly an additional weak magnetoception (direction)[3], and six more if interoceptive senses (see other internal senses below) are also considered.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense

    No. Grandiosity is believing/feeling oneself to be the "more", where shame is believing/feeling oneself to be the "less"
    Neat! You get to redefine words too.

  7. #7
    Soto Zen: "Chop wood, carry water."

    Pseudo Zen: "'Chop wood, carry water' is so simple. You complicate things. You're not a good Zen student."


  8. #8
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.
    Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: "You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong."
    Knight turned the machine off and on.
    The machine worked.
    http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/koans.html

  9. #9
    thou art wise oJjames R spidergoat's Avatar
    Posts
    44,602

  10. #10
    tending tangentially glaucon's Avatar
    Posts
    5,501
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    This understanding on a deep level simply means that one is no longer having the sensations as an 'I' or alien identity inhabiting the flesh and blood body -that lost, lonely, frightened entity in need of consolidation and validation by others- instead one becomes the experiencing of the 5 senses and no more or no less. Where grandiosity is the more and shame being the less, with neutrality as the steady-state emotional experience.
    nicholas,

    What is your point here?

    I mean, besides the illicit oratory..

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by glaucon View Post
    nicholas,

    What is your point here?

    I mean, besides the illicit oratory..
    I'm attempting to divulge the experience of being an apperceptive (being aware of one's own awareness) as opposed to imperceptive (blocked by being an 'I') flesh and blood body as such information is scarcely available on the internet as so few human being are apperceptive. This is for the sake of bringing a global peace on earth as only apperception can bring.

  12. #12
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    This is for the sake of bringing a global peace on earth as only apperception can bring.
    Well stop it!
    It's about time we had a decent global war, the last one was so long ago.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Well stop it!
    It's about time we had a decent global war, the last one was so long ago.
    It seems you take peace on earth let alone global peace on earth as a passing amusement, something to be bemused at. Perhaps I should be more clear as to how apperception is the only way to global peace? If I were to spread the word of an actual freedom, the direct seeing that matter is not merely passive, then the personal benefits would appeal to the many and the few would have successfully initiated an endemic for global peace.

  14. #14
    tending tangentially glaucon's Avatar
    Posts
    5,501
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    I'm attempting to divulge the experience of being an apperceptive (being aware of one's own awareness) as opposed to imperceptive (blocked by being an 'I') flesh and blood body as such information is scarcely available on the internet as so few human being are apperceptive. This is for the sake of bringing a global peace on earth as only apperception can bring.
    The you should have mentioned that in your OP......

  15. #15
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    It seems you take peace on earth let alone global peace on earth as a passing amusement, something to be bemused at.
    No, if I take it as a passing amusement then that should indicate that I consider it to be something to be amused by, not bemused "at".

    Perhaps I should be more clear as to how apperception is the only way to global peace?
    Yes please.

    If I were to spread the word of an actual freedom, the direct seeing that matter is not merely passive, then the personal benefits would appeal to the many and the few would have successfully initiated an endemic for global peace.
    Personal benefits? And these would be...?
    An endemic? Hmm, please refer to a dictionary.
    So, despite being aware that you should "be more clear as to how apperception is the only way (sic) to global peace" you're still just making claims based on nothing?
    Interesting.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    No, if I take it as a passing amusement then that should indicate that I consider it to be something to be amused by, not bemused "at".


    Yes please.


    Personal benefits? And these would be...?
    An endemic? Hmm, please refer to a dictionary.
    So, despite being aware that you should "be more clear as to how apperception is the only way (sic) to global peace" you're still just making claims based on nothing?
    Interesting.
    Let me correct my wording, I suppose you could say it will catch on as a pandemic not endemic.

  17. #17
    tending tangentially glaucon's Avatar
    Posts
    5,501
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    Perhaps I should be more clear as to how apperception is the only way to global peace?
    Yes.
    And while you're at it, please do some more research on the proper usage of the term "apperception".


    IEP - apperception


    For some reason, you're confusing it with some sort of Zen-ish notion of the loss of self...

  18. #18
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    Let me correct my wording, I suppose you could say it will catch on as a pandemic not endemic.
    Okay.
    And still no "explanation" or "clarification".

  19. #19
    C'mon, get happy! chimpkin's Avatar
    Posts
    4,418
    Once in a while you have one of those bleak epiphanies, a kind of dark satori, where you're fully aware of being alive and in the present moment, and it sucks.
    Spidey, I think I shall follow that comic...I know exactly what he's talking about.

    This understanding on a deep level simply means that one is no longer having the sensations as an 'I' or alien identity inhabiting the flesh and blood body -that lost, lonely, frightened entity in need of consolidation and validation by others- instead one becomes the experiencing of the 5 senses and no more or no less.
    @ nick
    Are you there yet?
    If you are, do you really think talking about it is going to get other people there?
    If you're not there, do you think these mental whackoff sessions will get you there?

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholas1M7 View Post
    I'm attempting to divulge the experience of being an apperceptive (being aware of one's own awareness) as opposed to imperceptive (blocked by being an 'I') flesh and blood body as such information is scarcely available on the internet as so few human being are apperceptive. This is for the sake of bringing a global peace on earth as only apperception can bring.
    No shit - "such information is scarcely available on the internet"?
    The internet is the absolute measure of how things really are?

    I am sure that the mark of an advanced student of meditation is to spend oodles of time online!

    Talk about virtual enlightenment.

Similar Threads

  1. By Mr. Hamtastic in forum General Philosophy
    Last Post: 08-10-11, 01:27 PM
    Replies: 43
  2. By Otto9210 in forum Politics
    Last Post: 03-29-11, 05:59 AM
    Replies: 6
  3. By Mr. Hamtastic in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 09-04-08, 05:24 AM
    Replies: 32
  4. By Mr. Hamtastic in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 09-02-08, 06:42 PM
    Replies: 102
  5. By coberst in forum General Philosophy
    Last Post: 11-12-06, 10:13 PM
    Replies: 4

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •