-
04-12-11, 06:08 PM #1
Planets Could Orbit Singularities Inside Black Holes
I found this interesting article and I've never heard of an inner Cauchy horizon before. Is this really a possibility or is it a crack pot theory?
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog...26626/?ref=rss
The discovery of stable orbits inside certain kinds of black hole implies that planets and perhaps even life could survive inside these weird objects, says one cosmologist
It's easy to imagine that black holes gobble up everything they encounter, consigning this stuff to eternal oblivion. Right?
Well, not quite. Today, Vyacheslav Dokuchaev at the Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow points out that certain black holes can have a complex internal structure. And that this structure ought to allow photons, particles and perhaps even planets to orbit the central singularity without ever getting sucked all the way in.
A black hole is a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing can escape, not even light. However, cosmologists have known for some time that there are regions inside charged, rotating black holes where objects such as photons can survive in stable periodic orbits.
Dokuchaev's contribution is to study these orbits in detail and to explore their dynamics. One of the problems that would at first seem to scupper any chance of planetary orbits inside a black hole is the way that the dimensions of space and time behave.
It's well known that a traveller passing through a black hole's event horizon arrives in a region in which the radial dimension becomes time-like, rather than space-like. Conventional orbits are clearly impossible here.
But travel further in and there is another horizon where the dimensions switch back again (at least, inside charged and rotating black holes). This is the inner Cauchy horizon and it's beyond here that Dokuchaev says the interesting orbits for massive planets exist.
He calculates that the stable orbits are nonequatorial and have a rich structure (see picture above). They would also be brightly illuminated by the central singularity and by photons trapped in the same orbit.
That raises an interesting question: whether a planet in such an orbit could support a complex chemistry that is rich enough to allow life to evolve.
Dokuchaev clearly thinks so. "Advanced civilizations may live safely inside the supermassive BHs in the galactic nuclei without being visible from the outside," he says, somewhat speculatively.
Of course, such a civilisation would have to cope with extraordinary conditions such as huge tidal forces and the huge energy density that builds up in these stable orbits as photons become trapped. There's also the small problem of causality violations, which some cosmologists predict would plague this kind of tortured space-time.
Dokuchaev has taken an interesting idea and pushed it as far as he can. It's one I suspect readers can have a lot of fun with too.
-
04-12-11, 08:42 PM #2Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 344
Personally I doubt this, but then again, I am no cosmologist.
-
04-12-11, 08:55 PM #3
Damn!
I bet Bob Forward could have made a bloody good story out of that. Right up his street.
-
04-12-11, 09:16 PM #4
This theory only works for black holes with high rotation speeds. I'm not sure what percentage of black holes rotate and what kind of rotation speeds we are talking about. I have heard a theory that says it's possible for a black hole to achieve faster than light rotation speeds. Again I'm not sure how that could happen if it does.
-
04-12-11, 09:39 PM #5
-
04-12-11, 09:44 PM #6Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 461
-
04-12-11, 10:06 PM #7Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 344
-
04-12-11, 10:33 PM #8
-
04-12-11, 10:51 PM #9
-
04-13-11, 03:25 AM #10
I didn't say there wouldn't be title force problems, just that the effects are quite different for the different size BH's. Also I personally find it very hard to believe any life could exist on the other side of an event horizon of any size BH. Anyway if life could exist on the other side of the event horizon, we would never be able to know about it would we?
-
04-13-11, 07:33 AM #11
When you mentioned this, it reminded me of an interesting historical fact. The famous logician Kurt Godel was a personal friend of Einstein's and actually quite well-versed in General Relativity. On top of all the things he's famous for in mathematics and logic, Godel was also the first to discover closed timelike curve solutions to the GR equations inside black hole event horizons (i.e. particles from the future interacting with themselves in the past). Of course this represents an idealized solution, neglecting everything in the universe other than the black hole itself and an infinitesimally light particle inside the event horizon which doesn't contribute anything to the total gravity. It also doesn't take quantum mechanics into account, which might potentially solve the entire conundrum.
-
04-13-11, 08:02 AM #12Banned
- Posts
- 2,425
-
04-13-11, 11:07 AM #13
-
04-13-11, 11:11 AM #14Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 344
-
04-13-11, 11:27 AM #15
You can always choose a way to die, but getting to a black hole might be a problem.
If you could get into a very tight orbit around a BH and release a long wire so that one end of it would cross the event horizon, it should be possible for someone on the other side to now send you a message. My thinking here is that gravity doesn't affect electricity the same way it does light.
-
04-13-11, 11:32 AM #16This isn't possible. The integrity of the wire (regardless of strength, thickness, material, etc) would be compromised and break as it crossed the EH. There are forces holding those molecules in place which are all subject to the same extreme conditions that everything else is in the vicinity.
Originally Posted by KillJoyClown
-
04-13-11, 11:42 AM #17
-
04-13-11, 11:54 AM #18I believe the formula is v=c*sqrt(r_s/(2(r-r_s))). An orbital velocity of c would give you a stable orbit of 3/2 r_s, which would require a black hole with an r_s of 2 miles which I'm certain would have lethal tidal forces. In other words, orbiting 1 mile above the BH is not possible.
Originally Posted by KillJoyClown
-
04-13-11, 12:19 PM #19
-
04-13-11, 12:39 PM #20
Yes, it's the same formula, and yes the tidal forces can be made arbitrarily small by assuming a larger BH. Keep in mind that this is for a stable orbit with no active rocket acceleration. If you're thrusting your rockets away from the BH you could get closer to it. Regardless, you could never "go fishing" across the EH.
Similar Threads
-
By Reiku in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 03-16-08, 01:15 PMReplies: 6
-
By Dr. Spitzer in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & CosmologyLast Post: 01-13-08, 02:39 PMReplies: 0
-
By Reiku in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & CosmologyLast Post: 12-12-07, 07:26 PMReplies: 16
-
By Reiku in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & CosmologyLast Post: 10-30-07, 03:57 AMReplies: 8
-
By genep in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 06-20-07, 06:35 PMReplies: 1

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks