-
08-05-10, 07:37 AM #1
UK: UFO Archives released
http://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Have fun you UFO nuts. The National Archives has release a whole bunch of information withheld for years for concern about the pandemic that could otherwise have amassed by people having their beliefs questioned.
-
08-05-10, 07:44 AM #2
-
08-05-10, 07:46 AM #3
I note from the list of files that the MoD seems to think they have records of observations right up to 2042.
Perhaps they've said too much.
-
08-05-10, 08:11 AM #4
-
08-05-10, 08:21 AM #5Registered Member
- Posts
- 33
this better not give me a virus!
damn downloads
-
08-05-10, 08:42 AM #6
-
08-05-10, 08:52 AM #7
-
08-05-10, 06:52 PM #8
The last lot they released were intensely tedious reading.
I hope these have a better story line and more nudity/ action. And no girly romance scenes.
-
08-05-10, 07:36 PM #9
-
08-05-10, 07:42 PM #10
I had to read that twice.
And you're correct. A girly romance scene (or three, let's not skimp on the interesting stuff) would improve the files considerably but not, please, a girly romance scene.
I remember sitting with my mate and his wife watching Pearl Harbour (on DVD) for the first time and us two guys screaming "Sod the girly romance! Get on with the f*cking war!".
Not that, when they did, the film improved any...
-
08-05-10, 07:43 PM #11
I firmly believe Ben Affleck would have changed the course of the war.
-
08-05-10, 07:49 PM #12
-
08-06-10, 06:35 AM #13
-
08-06-10, 05:24 PM #14
well must be a bunch of bullshit right stryder? i mean fox cnn and all major things covered it god guess presidets are nuts too i just wonder why the US havent released anything.
either way the goverment never ever ever ever covers up or witholdes information from the general public
-
08-06-10, 05:32 PM #15Banned
- Posts
- 1,211
Stryder is a bit out-of-line by declairing UFO-believers to be nuts. I'm sure in his life, there has been oddities he could not explain... if not, he is simply being pedantic on the face that ''something by a UFO-definition is certainly being observed''.
In defence, he hasn't actually stated whether it is of extraterrestrial original or not.
-
08-06-10, 05:56 PM #16
Actually he didn't.
He used the term "UFO nuts" i.e. in British English fans or devotees of UFOs.
Likewise a "football nut" is a devoted fan of football. As in "I'm nuts about...".
-
08-06-10, 06:02 PM #17
-
08-06-10, 06:07 PM #18
Er no.
I'm pretty sure, because of the way it was phrased, and Stryder actually being British and all, that it was meant as I explained.
-
08-10-10, 04:20 AM #19
If I meant it as an abrasive attack, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have even posted the article or referenced the URL for the archive. Perhaps I would of used the term Loonies or Idjiots, or "Waste of space", However I didn't.
While I might not agree to aliens existing or UFO's being anything more than wishful thinking, I wouldn't go so low as to attack people for their beliefs no matter how deluded I might think them.
I'd merely conclude that we agree to have differences in opinion and to be honest that is what makes a discussion.
-
08-10-10, 09:34 AM #20
Similar Threads
-
By 786 in forum World EventsLast Post: 05-02-10, 04:29 PMReplies: 295
-
By Gustav in forum Site FeedbackLast Post: 09-15-08, 03:41 AMReplies: 2
-
By extrasense in forum Intelligence & MachinesLast Post: 07-30-08, 01:35 PMReplies: 0
-
By StMartin in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 05-06-08, 11:45 PMReplies: 12



Bookmarks