+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 126

Thread: UFO Lights Filmed Descending Into Woods In India

  1. #1
    East coast smooth fish at dawn
    Posts
    2,293

    UFO Lights Filmed Descending Into Woods In India

    A formation of strange objects filmed over India. Dino-vultures imo phosphorescing and doing birdy things like claiming territory etc. What do you think?

  2. #2
    that was frikkin awesome!
    alien spaceships hovering and teleporting around
    they must be dimensional beings from an alternate universe
    simply incredible footage

    thanks

  3. #3
    East coast smooth fish at dawn
    Posts
    2,293
    Quote Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
    that was frikkin awesome!
    alien spaceships hovering and teleporting around
    they must be dimensional beings from an alternate universe
    simply incredible footage

    thanks
    NO! Not E.T's, why would they show themselves and teleport around the foothills of India for? It's flying cryptids you donuts, responsible for the cattle mutilations and very dangerous. The aliens are the good guys and are waiting for us to figure out the conundrum before they can make contact.

  4. #4
    oh
    is there a wiki entry for cryptids? i cannot locate one.
    are they from earth then? like from the core and stuff?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post
    NO! Not E.T's, why would they show themselves and teleport around the foothills of India for? It's flying cryptids you donuts, responsible for the cattle mutilations and very dangerous. The aliens are the good guys and are waiting for us to figure out the conundrum before they can make contact.
    Don't you mean it's flying donuts you cryptid?

    Seriously some shakey video from in the boonies of India really doesn't equate to evidence of anything other than sensationalism. The posed "teleportation" looks no different than the firing of a flare which doesn't light up until it reaches a set distance away from where it's being fired, of course you've heard that rationale before so it's obviously to obvious to be reality right?

  6. #6
    Dr. Probably Not GeoffP's Avatar
    Posts
    20,006
    Well, I'm interested, anyway. I don't know about flares - looked kind of flat - but it could easily have been faked.

  7. #7
    East coast smooth fish at dawn
    Posts
    2,293
    Quote Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
    oh
    is there a wiki entry for cryptids? i cannot locate one.
    are they from earth then? like from the core and stuff?
    The closest is the ropen of Papua New Guinea, although this is reported to be featherless. The feathered variety is typical of the Owlman of Cornwall (near where I live btw). Incidentally, I think they mainly eat fish or cuttlefish etc from the ocean but supplement from livestock, digesting the tongue and other nutritious soft parts. The anal bore holes would be due the desire to locate the urine intact within the bladder imo, which has a high concentration of phosphorous compounds Dartmoor sheep mutilation photos (notice the green slurry of the intestines infront of the rear legs).

    Stryder: a skeptic can call the chinese lantern, flare or fake footage all day long, but if one investigates all the cases, like Nick Pope for example, then a pattern emerges that there is genuinely something strange going on.

  8. #8
    Blurry out of focus footage with too much camera shake, and it's probably just flares.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post
    T but if one investigates all the cases, like Nick Pope for example, then a pattern emerges that there is genuinely something strange going on.
    Nick Pope is a liar.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post
    T but if one investigates all the cases, like Nick Pope for example, then a pattern emerges that there is genuinely something strange going on.
    Nick Pope is a shithead.

  11. #11
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post
    but if one investigates all the cases, like Nick Pope for example, then a pattern emerges that there is genuinely something strange going on.
    Are you trying to imply that Pope investigated ALL the cases?
    Are you trying to imply that Pope INVESTIGATED all the cases?
    Pope is a fantasist.

  12. #12
    Pope was kicked out of MI5MoD for losing track of the objective, namely impartial investigation, when he started going the route of David Icke he became a joke.

    Edit: Whooops...
    Last edited by Stryder; 07-06-10 at 10:42 AM.

  13. #13
    East coast smooth fish at dawn
    Posts
    2,293
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Are you trying to imply that Pope investigated ALL the cases?
    Are you trying to imply that Pope INVESTIGATED all the cases?
    Pope is a fantasist.
    He was the sole officer for cataloguing incoming UFO reports for the MoD you donuts and it was his job to evaluate any possible security threats to UK airspace. The level of direct threat was deemed very low by the powers-that-be and his position was terminated as surplus to requirements. Nick Pope himself knew that a small percentage of the hundreds of reports were a genuine mystery which required further investigation. His superior officers appeared to disagree.

  14. #14
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post
    He was the sole officer for cataloguing incoming UFO reports for the MoD you donuts
    Correct.
    Except that what he often neglects to mention is that that part of his job was throwaway, an add-on to his actual job for the MoD. As in "well somebody has to do it so we'll farm it out to the office boy".
    I should stress that overall, in the scheme of things, UFOs is a tiny part of my branch's business - probably not even taking up a quarter of my time
    The main duties of the post concern non-operational RAF activities overseas and diplomatic clearance policy for military flights abroad. A small percentage of time is spent dealing with reports from the public about alleged 'UFO' sightings and associated public correspondence. The Ministry of Defence has not investigated a case of alien abduction, crop circle formations, or animal mutilation.
    http://www.uk-ufo.org/cosford/modpage.html

    his position was terminated as surplus to requirements.
    He resigned.

    Nick Pope himself knew that a small percentage of the hundreds of reports were a genuine mystery which required further investigation. His superior officers appeared to disagree.
    Again you're conflating "not having an (ordinary) explanation" with "it must be a real UFO".

    And you missed my points completely.

    1) Pope only had the opportunity to investigate the cases that were actually reported to the MoD.
    2) Pope didn't have the time or the manpower to do thorough investigations - this would lead to lack of data and the conclusion I alluded to above. For example this site gives some insight as to the, ah, professionalism of Pope's "investigations".
    the demands of his other allocated functions precluded him from carrying out any kind of field investigations and he had no defined resources to carry out this function on his behalf. This factor meant that he was unable to verify estimates of direction, height, speed, and size, other than via the telephone which is an unsatisfactory substitute for a site visit and personal interview with the witnesses.
    http://www.uk-ufo.org/cosford/modpage.html

  15. #15
    East coast smooth fish at dawn
    Posts
    2,293
    You didn't see the tv documentary then?

    P.S Compare footage with The Rendlesham Forest incident

  16. #16
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    What's a TV?

    Which documentary?
    And why would I want to watch something aimed at the 5-second-attention-span viewer?
    I have never yet come across a TV documentary that gives the full facts, or even, in most cases, the actual facts.
    Even when I did own a TV I looked upon "documentaries" as "possible starting points" (much like Wiki) rather than sources of information.
    Having seen so many in my youth that catered for my field of expertise that were so badly flawed I tend to regard ALL as (potentially) equally flawed and view them with suspicion and healthy pinch of salt.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    For example this site gives some insight as to the, ah, professionalism of Pope's "investigations".
    Odd that Pope only got Radar data from Fylingdales, and not DRA Malvern, RAF Digby, or RAF Menwith Hill.

    Also the disclaimer about local Radar was odd, given the alleged sighting from two different Airforce bases.

    Ah, but then Pope is a shithead.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by common_sense_seeker View Post

    P.S Compare footage with The Rendlesham Forest incident
    The perpetrators of that hoax owned up. Mentioning it does nothing for your credibility.

  19. #19
    Penguinaciously duckalicious. Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Posts
    15,966
    Yup, you'd'a thunk Cottesmore might have had some info too, bearing in mind that place covers the middle of the country.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Yup, you'd'a thunk Cottesmore might have had some info too, bearing in mind that place covers the middle of the country.
    Let's be honest, we are surveillance central. You'd have thought if there was something to see, we'd see it.

Similar Threads

  1. By rahul_sharma in forum Eastern Philosophy
    Last Post: Yesterday, 01:51 AM
    Replies: 63
  2. By S.A.M. in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 02-11-10, 01:01 AM
    Replies: 16
  3. By lepustimidus in forum Ethics, Morality, & Justice
    Last Post: 09-02-08, 12:42 AM
    Replies: 0
  4. By S.A.M. in forum Politics
    Last Post: 02-22-07, 06:40 PM
    Replies: 140
  5. By OliverJ in forum World Events
    Last Post: 04-16-06, 06:21 PM
    Replies: 82

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •