Fosterfarianism?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by fosterfarian123, Apr 14, 2010.

  1. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    Fosterfarianism is a fairly recent Neo-Religion created by Forest Smith. Though presently its following is remarkably small, it seems to have an incredible potential to grow. It's based on the idea that religion and science can be fused into one belief system. His theory for this is very simple, but utterly brilliant. Here is the direct quote from the FaceBook group's page:
    "As we all know, religion and science have had a sordid past. All you have to do is mention the name Darwin, these days, and you might as well brace for an argument. Fosterfariansism is neither pro science, nor anti-science. We believe to achieve perfection, you must bind religion with science. Now, when talking about an afterlife or "heaven" it is widely debated as to if this place exists. Obviously, why would you praise me unless I offered you eternal life in a REAL place? Which is why I'm explaining all of this to you. There is theorem that states that outside of the known universe there are an infinite number of other universes. They're all guided by their own scientific laws. When we die our souls go to another universe and are placed into a new body. There exists a universe in which all things live forever. THis place is the Fosterfarian heaven. And, if you prove yourself worthy, you will get to go there."
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    There is no scientific support for the concept of the soul.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    You make an interesting point. This is true. But if we don't have a soul, do we even have a moral compass? Think about it. What separates us from animals is increased mental function. If we don't use this higher intelligence to determine right from wrong or to enlighten ourselves to the fact that the universe is more than a purely random occurrence, what are we using it for?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    We actually share most of the same morals as apes. It comes from evolution and a large brain, not some fuzzy supernatural concept of a soul. The soul is an element in a cosmic fairy tale which promises everlasting torture for immoral behavior. I think we can be mature enough to conclude that moral behavior is it's own reward.
     
  8. 3.14159265358979323 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120
    Hmm. This seems excellent!
     
  9. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Then he's in the wrong.
    There's nothing scientific about religion.

    Yes, unfortunately for him the same (speculative) theory also states that IF there are other universes they are totally inaccessible to us.

    What does the one have to do with the other?
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2010
  10. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    You truly believe that there isn't even the SLIGHTEST possibility that the fact that we exist isn't merely coincidence? Don't you think it seems a bit odd conditions are just so perfect for you to be living here, on this very Earth?
     
  11. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    So what you're saying is you knowingly choose to act immorally? You don't have any kind of philosophy to govern your lifestyle?
     
  12. 3.14159265358979323 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120
    "Then he's in the wrong.
    There's nothing scientific about religion."

    Maybe so, but he advocates a religion that can stand on its merits and is more credible than the other fairytales.
     
  13. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    Ignore that last comment, I misunderstood the latter half of your statement.
     
  14. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    If people act immoral, then yes, it is a choice. There are philosophies that could assist the morally challenged, but I don't believe they are necessary.
     
  15. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    Following in that train of thought, who says that moral behavior will be rewarded? Perhaps being merely reasonable is all the merit you need. Furthermore, what kind of a God has to resort to petty unverifiable threats to command his subjects? You know you're not a good leader when you rely on a reign of terror.
     
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Um, no. He's using (actually abusing) science to foster his "religion". Hardly its "own merit".

    Really?
    More credible?
    Only to the gullible who believe someone telling them "science says this and that" and can't be bothered to check.
    In other words he's using "science" instead of "god" as the figurehead. The main difference, of course is that anyone can actually check on science says (as opposed to god not being in the phone book, makes it rather hard to get the word from the horse's mouth, so to speak).
    I bet the vast majority of believers will take this guy's word for it on what "science says" - abrogation of intellect...
    Oops, much like religion.
     
  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Apart from religion?
    Or society? (Although society does it in the negative way - behave immorally and you get punished, one way or another).

    What kind of religious leader has to resort to specious falsifications of what science says?

    You can tell a bad leader when he lies about the source of his "authority".
     
  18. 3.14159265358979323 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120
    Dywyddyr: "Um, no. He's using (actually abusing) science to foster his 'religion'. Hardly its "own merit'."

    Hmm. I'll accept that I was incorrect.
     
  19. 3.14159265358979323 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    120
    Anyway.. To examine the rest of the argument: ... Hmm. Seems credible
     
  20. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    My, you are really espousing quite a bit of vitriol. Perhaps you are taking this the wrong way? Nobody is using science as some sort of scam device. It's just a theory. Religion is a system of beliefs, nobody has THE answer, that's why there are many religions. Even if you don't agree with his theory, you could examine his philosophy.
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Where did I say, or imply that?
    Actually no, I don't believe that. It could be possible we're not here by coincidence. But there's no evidence that we are.

    Don't you think that if conditions weren't so perfect* for us as we are we'd be a different sort of creature? We fit our environment, it wasn't tailored to us.

    * Of course, that's for a given value of "perfect", bearing in mind the hazards of life on Earth - disease, natural disasters, etc.
     
  22. fosterfarian123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    Once again, I am quoting from his site:
    "Most of religion is governed by philosophy of some kind. As a Fosterfarian we have an entirely different take on philosophy. To illustrate this, I bring you the two theories of the universe. The first states that all events are random. Nothing can be predicted, nor can it be altered by a higher power. The other states that all occurrences have been preordained by a god of some kind. Most of us don't go charging into oncoming traffic assuming we will come out alive due to the influence of a higher power. But many of those who call themselves Christians claim God has a plan for everything. So why not?

    Fosterfarian philosophy is not one governed by a strict moral code or ancient teachings. It's governed by common sense. What kind of a God saves the life of someone who does something stupid and life-threatening? A God who has no respect for common sense. Let the stupid people remove themselves from this world the way Darwin intended.

    Nevertheless, I do not dispute either theory. The universe is both random, and preordained. In my mind, the biggest governing factor of the universe is the choices we make. Think about it, everything we see today is a result of the choices of someone in the past.

    Whatever you may believe is up to you."
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    You mistake rationality (and knowledge) for vitriol. Your error.

    No?
    Let's see:
    Looks like he's misusing what science says (and misrepresenting it) to claim that there is somewhere like "Heaven".

    Again, no. He's mentioned that there is a theory (without mentioning the corollary) and then gone on to state as a fact that one of these universes is "Heaven".

    Why? I know he's wrong.
     

Share This Page