Netanyahu gives speech to the UN just recently. It's a moving speech for me, and thoroughly addresses Iran from the Israeli perspective. http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=456B861E15F74202
I listened to 5 minutes and had to stop because of the reflexive gag reaction. Is this the best that Israel can come up with? Will comment more after hearing whole speech
Well it can be predicated from Surface to Air Missile's preemptive disapproval that she will wait only to retort with further irrelevant posts.
Couldn't stomach all that rhetoric Here is a transcript of the speech for those who don't want to listen to the Himmler of the day evading discussion of the Goldstone report by waving the Holocaust before everyone: http://www.nowpublic.com/world/benjamin-netanyahu-un-speech-full-text-transcript-sep-24-2009
S.A.M. is lying. (this is my new signature to show that SAM is being inaccurate, it will be most likely a common signature.) Netanyahu addresses specifically that report towards the end of the speech, it actually comprises a significant portion of the speech. A significant part of 'Part 3' and nearly all of 'Part 4'...actually almost 1/3rd of the entire speech discusses that report.
Is the linked transcript and the linked Netanyahu response to the Goldstone report inaccurate in any way?
Which claim in the report did he address? You can look up the claims here: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/specialsession/9/FactFindingMission.htm
So he did not discuss the claims of the report? Suppose, if I were to substitute that document he waved in the first video, with the testimonies of the victims in Gaza from the Goldstone report and repeat his words What would your response be? Would you find it moving?
The Goldstone report also addresses HAMAS war crimes. The guilt of one part does not excuse the guilt of the other. If you are denying the exhaustive and explicit validity of the Goldstone report, you would need to successfully refute the allegations of Israeli war crimes/human rights abuses, and without reference or recourse to the actions/activities of third parties as a contributing factor.