Couldn't agree more. The global warming fainters, however, don't like disagreement, so they usually name-call.
Warmist tactic 2: Villify the enemy, apply a weak ad hominem label, and claim victory afterwards. This is just too predictable. What does being...
Here, we see Warmist tactic 1, yet again: Claiming that anyone who disagrees with you is part of an imaginary conspiracy and is working for "Big Oil".
It never gains any precision past 3 or 4 decimal digits. A true random generator would forever improve in precision.
Really? I think you merely typed 123456 over and over. Give a set of true random results. Here's an appropriate example:
Noises for each digit, 0-9? If that is what you mean: Pi is not pseudo-random. It is truly random, as the distribution of digits 0-9 approaches 1/10...
But it is pseudo-random. It will repeat. Therefore, not random. Rejected. Two tosses are never identical. There are also too many factors to...
Random means "without pattern". Dice rolls, assuming a fair die and no bias, produce random outcomes.
Generalizations are fun!
It's nothing to be scared of, anyway.
What irony? The poster was a liar, and it was obvious. What's observed here: Warmist tactic 1: Claim that everyone who disagrees with you is part...
What can be done is improve how "random" the output is/how close it is to even distribution. Though, it can never be "truly" random. They are...
That can earn a ban? Please, show me where this is implicitly/explicitly stated. A piece of advice: Don't feed the trolls.
You know, I despise liars like you.. I really do..
That's all you true believers have.. Ad hominem attacks and nothing more.
A truly random number should obey the following: 1. Decimal expansion/length is not predictable. 2. Digit distribution is not predictable. 3. No...
Hmm.. I doubt it does. Pi and the other irrationals are not truly random, as the amount of times each digit appears is predictable (Converges to 1...
Just ban the idiot.. Why did Dyw manage to feed the troll for 5 pages of the thread? And the trolling was so obvious there as well.
This is an example of the Gambler's fallacy. The odds of an unbiased coin landing heads = 0.5 out of 1, and it is the same for tails. The chances...
Prime search. Searched for larger primes via Proth/NewPGen/PFGW. The searches turned up: 59991 * 291360 + 1 (27507 digits) 10462 * 12968192 + 1...
Separate names with a comma.
