No such conclusion was entertained.
I recommend the advice presented in What You Eat Matters - 2018 Documentary H.O.P.E. [MEDIA]
Climate alarmism has been around for many years, long enough to test many unambiguous predictions. And as it has been so comically and astutely...
The God Axiom isn't necessary to persuade knowledgeable quantum physicists of the reasonableness of quantum creationism.
There's certainly nothing about the four postulates of Charles Darwin or their logical conclusions that contradicts the compelling evidence for the...
I'm happy with the "metaphysical speculation" that allows for a highly ordered physical reality to spontaneously materialize out of absolute...
Actually, there are Christians not even in my fellowship that believe that I have received inspired dreams and visions from God because God has...
Then creationism is most accurately classified as metaphysical speculation. I'll interpret that as a win for my Shubertian perspective.
I'm under no obligation to respond to off-topic remarks.
Yes, Yes in this context indicates acknowledgement, agreement.
What I don't expect is a refutation.
This is the very definition of hypocrisy. And I agreed with Yazata's judgment against these hypocrites.
Perhaps you should read the statement that I quoted and was in agreement with.
I had every right to coin the term "quantum creationism," to use that creation and to prove theorems about it.
So you believe that no atheist is a hypocrite or only that a few atheists are hypocrites? You live in a fool's paradise.
Prof. Alexander Vilenkin, Director, Institute of Cosmology at Tufts University, seems to believe his first-cause fantasy about the origin of the...
There is no evidence of that and I vehemently deny it.
See Theorem 2 in the opening post accompanied by the proof caught on video.
Clearly, you have a problem with David Hilbert's theoretical atlas of all logically consistent universes.
So you think the definition of science at dictionary.com is goofy and wrong and that David Hilbert's conceptualization of science is goofy and wrong?
Separate names with a comma.
