Just so. I have seen a rainbow from a car, due to rain, visible in front of trees a scant 20 yards away. The non-sprinkler variety is not as common...
How does Epstein manage to justify this statement? How convoluted must his definition of 'information processing' be in order to draw this...
OK, this verifies what I said above: MUH is an eternalist view. It does surprise me to see the word 'abstract', which implies something more...
I never mentioned the word 'observer'. But again you reference Wigner interpretation, the only one which posits that consciousness has anything to do...
In QM, measurement has nothing to do with volition, intention, etc. The Wigner interpretation might be an exception to that, but water doesn't...
You are of course under no obligation to accept MUH. I have problems with it myself. Tegmark was stupid enough to suggest tests, all of which are...
You see a distinction between the idea of an apple and an apple, the reference vs. the referent, map vs territory. You seem to accept this for most...
Pretty much all of philosophy is unfalsifiable, at least the valid views. I agree with your list (both versions of solipsism) because indeed, both...
I've bailed on much of this discussion, especially the derailments, but am nevertheless trying to keep up. 'Physicial' in this context seems to be a...
For case R (rotation of a 2D disk), I suppose the answer lies in performing linear motion similar to the linear case, reducing the object to one...
But the MUH is not about concepts, and thus there is no such restriction. This seems to be a straw man objection. You seem to want to require...
Your suggestion of it confusing the map with the territory presumes a different model. Take the hypothesis on its own assumptions without adding your...
Separate names with a comma.
