I am answering the questions you asked by pointing out the difficulties. Time is typically measured by a clock, the ''speed'' of the mechanics of...
I am referring to a chronological record of change , measured compared to the speed of something else. i.e 24 hours is equal to one period of...
Thank you for sharing that interesting read, quite clearly that is somebody with a messiah complex who ignores scientific principles.
I will answer your question with a question that precedes your questions, how can we measure time without it being directly related and dependent to...
Ask again when you can write the analogy in better English , your post is really 'messy' .
I never mentioned compressing fields in atoms, I mentioned spatial field compression . Space-time overlays space.
Seriously , are you so ignorant of thinking about interpretation ? I suppose you are one of these expanding space types which compare to flat...
Where do I say mainstream physics is wrong ? Some of you misunderstand mainstream physics .
May I suggest you consider the titles to understand and think about the content. What does compression normally mean ? What does overlay normally...
More nonsense, we are discussing physics, where is the ''trolling''?
Indeed, but do we account for in these formations , field compression and overlay content ? In analogy rubbers balls being forced together...
With all due respect , more nonsense. There is no space without space-time is nonsense, space-time did not exist until Einstein thought it up,...
I think you are missing the point, the background space is not outside, it is the underlay of space-time. Background space is ever present...
Thank you , I think some members are missing the point and relevance.
Maybe we could suggest , bounded by gravity or space-time , ''inflating'' by an increase in entropy ? Additionally can we consider the 'edge' is...
Nonsense, you seem to be struggling to comprehend the difference between space and a spatial field that occupies the space. Again contradicting...
I said ''you have the correct understanding''in the other prior post. I agree the rubber sheet represents space-time and shows space-time...
Field curvature would be the correct interpretation as ''simulated'' in the rubber sheet example, you have the correct understanding of what I meant.
Firstly you claimed : After talking nonsense you now decide to contradict yourself, which answer is it?
Nonsense, that is suggestive to saying space itself is a ''solid'' with a ''rubber'' like structure. You are mistaken, space by definition is just...
Separate names with a comma.