Because of Fst 0.25 again? [img] Why is it that only Templeton uses this measure in biology?
Sadly your idea of "racism" includes the scientific study of humans.
Exactly, you are arguing from emotion rather than applying normal scientific systems and principles of parsimony to data. The people on this forum...
The fallacy you keep repeating is that in biology there is some arbitrary limit on "enough" between group variation to justify distinctiveness. When...
Anyone can look at this and see how it should be divided. Do you see a smooth continuum (which could still be divided)? No, you see orthogonal...
Forums with lying POV-pushing power-abusing Marxist mods?
If you are you just going to keep repeating that this is based on skin color there is no point bothering with you. So your next post will link to...
So maternal lead exposure explains the consistent global IQ pattern? Lol. The assumption that all adopted Black children go to families that drop...
You simply fail to understand basic biological taxonomy.
But a positive impact on East Asians, specifically in non-verbal IQ. This is also the case with malnourished Koreans, which was a third world country...
Your hypocrisy and dishonesty is disgusting. You introduced the "race does not exist" nonsense, supporting your claim with ridiculous copy pasted...
I am supporting my claim, by contradicting your race denial fallacies. How can my claim stand if race is an invalid concept? When I demonstrate the...
So because you're changing the subject I take it you admit your 0.25 Fst claim was wrong?
Specifically was Specifically what is it in my argument that you doubt? That classification is based on ancestry? That ancestry is inferred by...
Your sources refer to the "75% rule" for the level of classification separability of organisms in contact zones based on a handful of continuous...
No, you only referenced Templeton's assertion on this point. You then go into an irrelevant rant replete with ad hominem, ad nauseam assertions,...
Taking one point at a time. Can you find Fst 0.25 for subspecies in Smith 1997? Also, since it is "commonly used", can you find the statistic being...
So can you explain where Templeton got his 0.25 Fst value from? Also explain why <0.25 Fst invalidates race, but not species such as the human/chimp...
But do you agree that the authority you rely on, Templeton, misrepresented Wright's Fst statistic to make his argument, and his argument, therefore,...
No. Your Templeton reference sets up an arbitrary threshold for "enough" difference to make a distinction. Any difference justifies a distinction....
Separate names with a comma.
