Rather needlessly pedantic, when what I meant was the exact same thing. But allow me to increase the sophisticated show off by saying that Validity...
The classic argument against "I" are in no way able to debunk the fundamental truth revealed in Cogito Ergo Sum; that is simply put; "thought" exist....
And post #11 is especially well put, as it stays true to the language restriction for "nothing".
There are no assumptions in a priori inferences. There are only self-evident axioms.
I especially in agreement with post #3, except for the "Nothing is simply not quantifiable" part. I agree with this definition but only to limited...
Oh, I have. But you just didn't understand it because you still seeing it with reference to the outside world.
Cartesian Dualism put a priori inference as the basis of its absolute logic. A posteriori observations simply has no meaning to Descartes'...
In short; pure space (as in space that contains nothing in it) simply cannot exist.
Your confusing things here as well. Remember, we are arguing from Cartesian Dualism logic. You are somewhat repeatedly and haphazardly contesting a...
In order for the proposition to be scientifically valid, it must be falsifiable. In order for it to be falsifiable, it must be able to be translated...
To make it simpler; God is known apriori-ly via a doubtless intuition, in the same intuitively inferred way - our own existence is acknowledged....
I think you're confusing things. If we cannot use the words "something" and "nothing" to fit the reality that we proposed, then we should just come...
Oh, it is validly inferred and correctly reasoned - a priori. This is simply true since the Epistemological basis for Descartes's argument is...
I can't help but to chuckle. I know it's simply impossible for you to combine them together without undermining completely the definitions for both...
May I know how you are going to combine them together, so that "if they were" would become feasible?
Dolphin aren't fish.
Cogito Ergo Sum is the basis of Cartesian Dualism which you allege as faulty. As for Descartes' Ontological argument, it is a report of intuition....
To use a simpler example; What if Dolphin are fish? How are we going to continue with this proposition - scientifically speaking? In order for it...
I've never heard of anyone able to debunk Cogito Ergo Sum within its own Logic, this is despite the fact that I read SEP regularly. I suppose some...
I'm sorry Sir, but that is not my words. Such error must be attributed to the person whom authority I'm quoting from - Richard Morris. Nevertheless,...
Separate names with a comma.
